one case, the mother kept facebook messaging the father at work, as she was killing his son..texting "I think he's dead" at the end, and them some crazy shit.

Three is not very many in the grand scheme of things

There's also a huge difference between hearing about something and being, to some degree, involved in the incident

aye

fuck this is depressing, even to someone with dysthymia

skid it back to fake news! "Nintedo; It's _CAPTURED_ American children" https://youtu.be/yt4KG9ib8S4

Tbh the main thing is that we don't currently tackle mental illness/disorders in an especially productive manner for the most part. This is the case in both Canada and the US. Here a lot of people with debilitating mental illness end up on the streets

maybe you guys should consider that _that_ ends up costing more than therapy?

Oh it absolutely does

Doubly so when you consider non monetary costs

*the party that got us into this mess provincially is the one trying to make a platform out of fixing it*

it's monetary as well, if only as insurance bills for the citizens

crime rises -> insurance prices rises

Sure, that's why I said it's doubly the case when also considering non monetary costs

i read "doubly" as "doubtly" 😃

_skims_

Doesn't Canada have public mental health care though?

Not really, or at least not across all provinces

Your countries are too big, mega unions _NEVER_ work .. Not the Roman empire, not the EU, not the USSR...No one gives a shit, until it's provenly felt in their wallet or life.

1. Prescription medication is paid for by the individual
2. Pretty sure therapy is too
3. We had an institution but it was closed instead of being reformed

The thing is that Canada wouldn't function as a collection of countries. None of the regions are sufficiently developed for that to work. It'd be like trying to segment Russia

Worse actually, since Russia vastly outnumbers us

Also the US system worked pretty well when it operated as designed tbh

and now there's Calexit and Texit

Neither of which will actually happen

😄

no, no without a lot of quarrel and bitching, just like the fall of USSR

"Russia vastly outnumbers us" ... You say that like russians were holding a knife to your throat 😄

Not even due to that
It's because ultimately the states do benefit from being part of a union, the issue is that the power was supposed to be mostly held by the states and it was slowly consolidated

No I say it like underpopulated areas in the USSR are not country material as it stands, and they have nearly 5* Canada's population

_"ultimately the states do benefit from being part of a union"_ ... Well hey, i'm norwegian, and we've learned to stay out of unions..

_"[calexit/texit] Neither of which will actually happen"_ ... the sooner the better my friend... 🍺
https://youtu.be/ieQH6X_XBJo

https://youtu.be/5WBJsYJwHdQ

Is the claim that this is a false claim or that Canada is about to start producing state-funded propaganda?

The notion of the government funding news isn't new. But it is always bothersome. And the idea Trudeau would be in charge of selecting the people in control goes along with that.

It's a genuine claim

Canada is about to have 0 trusted news sources

I think the real turning point will be when they silence Rebel Media. They'll be totalitarian if they silence the National Post.

For the Americans, that's like banning Breitbart and killing Fox.

Still bothersome to have the government handing out money like that and getting control over how the money is spent (effectively bribing the press for good coverage).

Serious question, what matters most when determining trustworthiness...the messenger, or the messenge?