HOW WILL THEY FUCKING EAT>

they only earn on average 6 times what I made the entire year.

Comey is a self righteous virtues signaler

Cant believe he used to head the FBI

Good point @ryuplaneswalker . It’s not like FBI agents are living paycheck to paycheck.

Comey is a political player.

Yup. Sadly a lot of people in intelligence seem to be too. That’s where the money is.

Like the ones in Sanfran and DC probably are

but..

DONT LIVE IN GOD DAMN SANFRAN

Lol

I love how comey knows not of the nature of how a shutdown works

Also, aren't their paychecks on the 1st and 15th? Or on the 10th and 25th? How are they surviving until christmas if its not all put on credit anyway? Fucking idiot jurnos.

It isn't an Idiot Jurno

it is an idiot guy who worked in the Federal Government through a few dozen of these shut downs.

Yes, I saw that Tim covered this.
Here is that article if you want to read and share.

“ Secret experiment in Alabama Senate race imitated Russian tactics”
By Scott Shane and Alan Blinder on The New York Times

The Chief Executive of New Knowledge, and the architect of Hamilton 68 was involved in a false flag operation where they had fake Russian Bot accounts follow Roy Moore, then used fake Alabamian Republican accounts to sow discord in that election. This article attempts to downplay the effect, but the truth is that the media ate this up. Producing dozens of articles attempting to connect Moore and Putin. The media has also used Hamilton 68 as a reliable source in numerous articles. Hamilton is claimed to track “ Russian linked accounts” but refuses to reveal which ones. A dubious source based purely on that, but now that we know it’s creator is involved in Russian bot false flags, it’s clear it was completely a ruse , and the articles based on it are fake news.
http://archive.today/Amc3y

only people who fuck their sisters would believe this

"Alabama"

Ohhhh

Another article covered by Tim today. Read and share if you wish.

“Here are the most egregious fake news stories of 2018”
On The Daily Caller

Fantastic list of 32 of the worst fake news stories of the year.

http://archive.today/SnmYz

https://www.newsweek.com/how-trump-nazis-stole-christmas-promote-white-nationalism-755991 Ever read something that just made your eyes roll into another galaxy

Definitely have.

That’s a classic.
http://archive.today/wYtfq

People are saying calling it a white christmas is now rscist and there was an article but i cant find it

Must be a whole lot of people, then....

nah, it's the idiots in media as usual.

Its time for some SoC

Snow of Color

umm, like what?
how did it turn brown?
is this a political statement?
Like, did something brown touch it and then it turned brown?
Like smearing something brown against the white snow, in turn staining the snow with something brown?
and why then are we not talking about the implications of smearing something brown with white snow in racial terms?
is it that somehow we value value white snow above brown when we make a case for snow to default to a white hue?
and why would that be? - is it, that inherently, we default to white, regardless of circumstance?
because we _*prefer*_ white things over brown things?
dont tell me you are...
**colorist!**

Oh wait, I think regressives used that term before

damnit!

News, but I call it fake, i can easily rattle off many countries more dangerous than the USA.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna949676?fbclid=IwAR1EVmA60WREu0Q57kJ2eGWjQV8yi2337tXXGSeTVMu4LyBcIrLMlCITOhg&__twitter_impression=true

Yeah I saw something similar how the USA is one of the top "most dangerous countries for women"

yeah, total horse shit from radical lefties who didn't go out of town

oh, they are also in there:
https://canarymission.org/organization/Jewish%20Voice%20For%20Peace

Do y'all practice a standard to spell out in more descriptive, substantive detail regarding arguements and rebuttals ?

"More normie horse shit weak sauce"

Well. Versing yourself in formal logic is a good start.

Rattle off those those countries @4AM_critter 🐉, and more interestingly rattle off the quantity and quality of chatavteritics that your considering, along with criteria you see first to determine that

Make smart arguments that are not so attitudinal along with baron if substance

?