@Grenade123 it's big corporate coming down on smaller, more independent news tho

remember Chernobyl? Anything that is bad for humans appears to be good for nature, so what we actually need is less protection of the environment (where humans live!), less gun control and somehow pass a bill in the government to legalize cannibalism...

I endorse nuclear energy. A lot.

coming down? you mean buying up smaller companies? they do that.

local stations are not really "independent" news imo. they are often owned by one of the larger media companies

anybody who has taken time to research the topic with a open mind knows that nuclear is absolutely the way to go for power plants.

I have to say, I am not opposed to Nuclear, but they have pros and cons... Frankly we need to get congress to pull the ban on recycled pelet reactors and get more use out of them

what is the alternative

you're right though, it's just a matter of making the best tradeoffs

the way I see it, it's amazing that we have an option with so many winning tradeoffs like we see in nuclear.

I will admit that the cons of Nuclear are often way over sold and over hyped.

not like any of us are experts in this matter at the end

but that thorium nuclear looks very promising, looking to the future

I had to write a few papers for my ecology courses so I know a little

Pracitcally an expert now 😏

😂

Lmao na, just joshin'

I read reddit, so I know more than you

Oof, he got me.

The average discharge of radiation from a US reactor is less that opening a bottle of beer

geothermal energy is pretty cool

Now granted if things go wrong then it is a massive mess

Well then, why dont we just use these reactors for beer bottles then. It seems like beer bottles are going to be the next chernobyl.

I sometimes don't understand why we don't just stick crap into the earth and let our warm interiors and mantles and shit heat the water up

Issues to do with pressure and the like.

It would be a good thing to develop though

is that the issue though..? 🤔

if I were someone who built an oil monopoly and a bunch of other shit on top of that, why would I ever want people to have easy energy? no incentive, at all, for anyone in the energy industry

just like no incentive to cure cancer instead of just prolonging the treatment bills

That and engery returns to expenditures for that idea Unwound

The problem I have with solar is that solar is THE MOST toxic form of energy on the planet. The stuff they use to make solar cells are toxic. Wind keeps killing birds left and right, espeically endangered species of birds...

solar and wind are memes

^^^

Nuclear is a really good option, as well as space solar.

Have any of you seen an off the grid house with solar and wind power?

Rockefellers seriously planned this all out, they started the "green" revolution. they owned both the oil and "green" industries, don't you see how brilliant that is?

you can own everyone forever if you control both pieces on the balance board, cheap dirty "dinosaur" fuel, and the clean, globe-saving sun fuel

it's fucked up but brilliant lmao

To run a small house with lights, 1 computer, 1 Refigerator, 1 Stove and 1 water heater, it takes a 1 car garage filled with batteries to keep it runing

battery doesn't produce energy tho, right

And we are talking the big ones for trucks