It is antithetical to moral principles on its own

Okay why

Man this is just like "communism will work this time, it only failed because the west interfered"

The seizure of private property and business first of all. And don't tell me every businessman was a criminal or a Jew.

"The Republic will work this time" is your argument. That or "no point in fixing it, screw culture, it has no value"

No, I don't support republics

We literally crafted the shortest-lives system to fail on its own merits

Culture belongs to people and the only way to keep it is to pass it on to your kids and teach them the value of it.

A million individuals is more important than a society

So let's move on to a system that is prove to last. A caste society, or a monarchy

Agreed

This is where I tell you that I unironically support a caste system in this country

The responsibility of the Indo-Aryan upper caste was to ensure that the holy fire is passed down to the plebians

It worked damn well

And is fully compatible with the republic

In my case I never give myself an illusion that I am going to stop all crime or even make a dent in the crime rate. I just concern myself with one person at a time because the individual has value and all life is precious. It's not "people" I worry about, it's "this person, that person, and the other person" etc.

Republic is flawed. Of course all systems are, but a republic more so.

And that's fine. You do you. I naturally focus on the bigger picture

A presidential election in the US is basically giving a nuclear arsenal to the most popular kid in school

It is an arms deal basically

In any case, a caste system requires that the upper caste dictate what is morally acceptable for a society

If you will give me gibmedats. Free health insurance, free welfare and food stamps etc, I'll give you 3000 nuclear missiles

So my question becomes

Why is it okay for the upper caste to do it, but not the guvmint

Why is it okay for a monarch

You put faith in monarchy

I could make the exact same arguments against a monarchy that you make against natsoc, except I would have historical precedent to back me up other than "other nations defeated the monarchy"

Outside influences just like with natsoc

The fallibility of man

But we had a system that lasted a thousand years

For the record I am not full natsoc. In my studies I've long since decided that the caste system will preserve as much intent of the founders as possible

But they share qualities

Lower taxes than we have today. More days off from work. Less overseas wars.

Especially regulation where it is needed without slavish dedication to preserving the subversive desires of the plebians

Imagine if you could only be drafted for 40 days a year and could not be sent overseas. 2/3 of US WW2 troops were conscripts. 1/3 in Vietnam.

Imagine a 33% tax.

Compare to now. 6.2% social security, 1.45% Medicare, 12% federal income tax, 7% sales tax if you're lucky

Trickle down taxes on other things like gas

Ammo

Property tax

Car registration tax