Message from @π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
Discord ID: 519807472542941184
Purpose is subjective, debate over. Reee at me all you want.
Not if the standard is life
SHUT UP BARTERCUCK
Also the standard is defined by the metaphysical implications
Does the body not imply its need to survive?
Ethics is aesthetics. Not worth debate.
Lol okay
I can use a knife to cut butter, But I can also satiate my curiosity and do that trick that one commenter on my video suggested, And shove it up my ass. therefore its purpose is subjective
No because it was made to cut things its the generalized purpose
It still cuts in your ass
Stabbing and cutting are different things
Depends what purpose it is used for to determine whether it is a good means to the end.
It's designed purpose is to cut. You can give it a different personal purpose, but that doesn't change the designed purpose
You have to think along the lines that there are different kinds of purpose
If the purpose is cutting paper, scisors are good for that. If the purpose is anal pleasure, not unless you are a masochist.
~~JK rowlings original purpose was to write a good book, Now her purpose is to prove how gay black and trans everyone in her books were~~
Thats not her purpose
Yeah the purpose of scissors can be for anal pleasure if you personally are a weirdo, but the designed purpose is still to cut
Value is determined by the actual use, not intended use.
Hmm, yes. Often the two line up, but value is from personal use
The general use of a knife is to cut or pierce so thats its intentions
Maybe the use is to sell it for profit.
It is sold for its value not for it being a knife
It's value comes from it being a knife, as well as other qualities it has
Value depends on its effectiveness at achieving the goal, the desire to achieve the goal, and its scarcity.
gtg I'm gonna leave with a poem though
My skin is so white
My undies feel tight
I must sleep for the night
Gei
This is straight af boi
βValueβ is that which one acts to gain and/or keep. The concept βvalueβ is not a primary; it presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what? It presupposes an entity capable of acting to achieve a goal in the face of an alternative. Where no alternative exists, no goals and no values are possible.
Did you copy paste that from mises website?
Mises?
Sounds austrian.
My poem
?
Gei
IT WAS STRAIGHT AF BOI
Boi pussy is gay.
Dick girls are gay.
Striped socks are gay.
Actually could someone define a standard of something being subjective?