Message from @π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
Discord ID: 519813262141816832
No, you said it, not me
Nice try Pancuck
Wtf it really is
Also just as the number of its adherents is not a proof of an ideaβs truth or falsehood, of an art workβs merit or demerit, of a productβs efficacy or inefficacyβso the free-market value of goods or services does not necessarily represent their philosophically objective value, but only their socially objective value, i.e., the sum of the individual judgments of all the men involved in trade at a given time, the sum of what they valued, each in the context of his own life.
At least call me pansexy
Subsexy
reeeee
As in less than, not submissive.
Both really.
*Fucking cringe bro*
I don't restrict myself when I say cringy things
I get way cringier
Id say value is socially objective
Fuck off it is. Trade could not exist if it was socially objective.
If two people make a trade, they must both prefer what they are receiving more than what they give up, or they wouldn't trade.
A free market never loses sight of the question: Of value to whom? And, within the broad field of objectivity, the market value of a product does not reflect its philosophically objective value, but only its socially objective value.
Hey halfkink I'm not a pancuck
Gottem
That is price not value. @Existence is identity
<:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105> <:GWempDab:404075913605677105>
The price is the metaphysical evidence of a value
My phone is dying again
Or equilibrium price more specifically.
Value is in the people not the item.
Objective *societal* value
There is no such thing as society.
It is the sum of the individual interests
Grapes can't be a fruit because grapefruit exists so grapes being fruit would contradict naming conventions
Estimated from the standpoint of the best possible to man, i.e., by the criterion of the most rational mind possessing the greatest knowledge, in a given category, in a given period, and in a defined context
Ideal observer fallacy.
@π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ you need the abilty to delete taken away so you can learn some impulse control ffs.
I am not familiar
but the reason I like discord is because it isn't a twitch chat
Im banned of twitch
*off
Sweet
I'm banned from geoffs chat
Best thing to ever happened