Message from @paradigm

Discord ID: 520291676548497430


2018-12-06 17:20:47 UTC  

Again, depends on the jurisdiction.

2018-12-06 17:21:16 UTC  

Beyond medical emancipation, then it is up to either a consensus of the parents or the courts.

2018-12-06 17:21:52 UTC  

Again, this is just pure legality

2018-12-06 17:21:55 UTC  

That is not my understanding of emancipation, and I would oppose it.

2018-12-06 17:23:05 UTC  

Again, the intent is to yield agency to youth to make their own decisions about their sexual destiny. I'm not judging it, just laying that out.

2018-12-06 17:23:57 UTC  

Sure. And I would oppose it, as would very many other people.

2018-12-06 17:25:02 UTC  

Now on to ethics. No gender specialist I am aware of in the US would prescribe meds to a minor who is not legally given agency by the state to make their own decisions or who is not supported by either their legal guardians or a court with jurisdiction.

2018-12-06 17:25:52 UTC  

That sounds like a legal concern, rather than an ethical concern.

2018-12-06 17:26:19 UTC  

We can set aside emancipated minors, because emancipated minors are legally adults, not children.

2018-12-06 17:26:34 UTC  

In this case fear of lawsuit is part of it but also looking to the state to determine when someone is able to exercise medical agency. That later perspective is the ethics.

2018-12-06 17:27:07 UTC  

I'm ethically against adults having sex with minors for example. That said, the age I consider "minor" changes depending on the juristiction I'm considering.

2018-12-06 17:27:38 UTC  

I let the citizenry make that determination and then adapt my ethics appropriately.

2018-12-06 17:28:18 UTC  

That said, even I draw lines below about 15 which is where my morality comes in.

2018-12-06 17:28:50 UTC  

Morality and ethics are very separate concepts. Morality is entirely internal whereas ethics are guided by outside principles.

2018-12-06 17:29:40 UTC  

We deal with this in healthcare a lot, which is why I said in another discussion that I am ethically pro-choice but morally pro-life.

2018-12-06 17:30:04 UTC  

In cases where a legal minor (not emancipated) disagrees with the decisions of the legal guardians regarding medical treatment, the minor may petition the court to overrule the decision of the legal guardians. That is a legal procedure that exists to handle exceptional cases, and should be adequate.

2018-12-06 17:30:18 UTC  

I agree

2018-12-06 17:30:33 UTC  

In the event that there are "automatic medical emancipation" laws without any kind of process, I would oppose them categorically.

2018-12-06 17:31:39 UTC  

This is an honest question so that I understand your perspective accurately. Do you believe a 16yo should be able to obtain oral contraceptives without their parent's permission?

2018-12-06 17:32:22 UTC  

Or should the parent be able to deny that to the minor despite the fact the parent cannot control that minor's sexuality?

2018-12-06 17:33:22 UTC  

I believe the 16 year old has access to emancipation procedures, and can use those if desired.

2018-12-06 17:33:35 UTC  

So they have to go to court to take "the pill"?

2018-12-06 17:33:38 UTC  

Once emancipated, the 16 year old is an adult.

2018-12-06 17:34:16 UTC  

Not at all, @DrYuriMom , the minor would have to go to court to set aside the decision of the legal guardians.

2018-12-06 17:34:35 UTC  

Many parents will consent.

2018-12-06 17:34:37 UTC  

Hmm'kay

2018-12-06 17:34:55 UTC  

I just wanted to be clear where you stood. I'm not judging. I just want to be clear.

2018-12-06 17:35:19 UTC  

It's very simple. Legal guardianship is controlling, unless set aside with due process.

2018-12-06 17:35:59 UTC  

If there is a disagreement between the guardian and the minor on medical issues, there is process to handle that.

2018-12-06 17:36:49 UTC  

Hmm'kay. We can agree to disagree on that but at least I get where you are coming from and can certainly respect it given your consistency in application.

2018-12-06 17:37:38 UTC  

As things stand, it all varies from state to state which warms the cockles of my 10th Amendment heart

2018-12-06 17:38:27 UTC  

Now as far as the sexism of transgender. Honestly, in many cases, yes, @halfthink.

2018-12-06 17:39:04 UTC  

Historically there were many more M-to-F than F-to-M for the very reason that "tomboy" carries very different connotations in the US than does "sissy"

2018-12-06 17:40:26 UTC  

Many under the transgender umbrella are there only because their gender expression is outside the bounds of permissability in their culture.

2018-12-06 17:41:19 UTC  

They flock with transexuals only because society derides men who where feminine clothing.

2018-12-06 17:42:01 UTC  

That said, transsexuality is totally different and really has nothing to do with clothing. I never cross dressed while male bodied.

2018-12-06 17:42:05 UTC  

Not once.

2018-12-06 17:42:43 UTC  

I wore my first skirt fully six months AFTER I transitioned. My first dress two months after that.

2018-12-06 17:43:10 UTC  

Nowadays I wear a skirt or a dress maybe five days a year.

2018-12-06 17:44:14 UTC  

Most of the time I just wear scrubs. They're easier and I don't have to worry about blood spatters. I even wear them on weekends simply because of ease.

2018-12-06 17:45:13 UTC  

Also, I tried cosmetics during my first year but threw my hands up in frustration and now wear the stuff only once every 10 years, for my high school reunions.