“Maybe you’re wrong” is an accusation that must be supported by specific evidence. It cannot be uttered without context, grounds, or basis, i.e., arbitrarily.

I know because I perceive it

So there's no difference?

Through my senses and then apply it to non contradictory identification

Onus of proof is on the person making the claim, dude.

If you don't have an argument, then "maybe you're wrong"

Third wave feminism is garbage. However, I do see positivity in the first and second waves before this unnecessary third wave came.

God, you are evasive

You accept the premise yourself

Proof presupposes existence

Maybe the misunderstanding was earlier then. What do you mean by "evidence"? I assumed empirical evidence from that.

Yes

Through your senses

So how do you know the sun exists?

Because I perceive it

Do you know it exists outside of your mind?

Yes, if I have knowledge of it before its out of my focus

You cant know of something you dont perceive or hear/read about

So would you consider the sun in the matrix as existing outside of your mind?

Which still has to be perceived

I dont remember the Matrix

I watched it a long time ago

For a dude who lives in a computer program.

We dont live in a computer program

How do you know that?

“Maybe you’re wrong” is an accusation that must be supported by specific evidence. It cannot be uttered without context, grounds, or basis, i.e., arbitrarily.

Onus of proof is on you.

We have no evidence of it

I cant be asked to prove a negative

Empericism is commie propaganda, bruh.

It is possible, the skeptic argument declares, for man to be in error; therefore, it is possible that every individual is in error on every question. This argument is a non sequitur; it is an equivocation on the term “possible.”

>Because we arent omniscient we cant know anything

There would be no way to know either way.

I don't think there would be any significant difference anyway.

You are making the positive claim that existence exists outside of our mind. The onus of proof is on you.

Because existence has to be focused on

Awareness is not a passive but active state, when you close your eyes does everything vanish metaphysically

Knowledge is what makes possible the discovery of fallibility.

Would something you perceive in a dream exist as much as something you perceive while awake?

No, because it does not consist with reality

How do you know you are awake?