Message from @🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞
Discord ID: 548041529973932032
Some books should be burned.
ahh
Communist Manifesto, one of the very few books that should be burned.
Hitler did nothing wrong, ex ante.
The commie manifesto is one of the best arguments against communism tho.
Nah, that would be Marxist value formation theory.
Oh, you said "one of". That is certainly true.
Another person who might be an illegal alien trys to kill a female police officer
@halfthink lmao that's true about the communist manifesto, i never understood the "it sounds good on paper", no it fucking doesn't
and nobody cares it seems
are people still arguing about global warming?
its quite weird that I can understand anti-vax people, etc if they were to write an article about why you should be anti-vax the headline would be "THE GOVERNMENT IS FORCING YOU TO LET THEM INJECT POLIO INTO YOUR CHILD" which, while technically correct, is like saying that hydric acid has been found in new york plumbing
They are radicals who have so much faith in this headline that they will dismiss the reasons why it is important for your child to be able to be immune to these diseases
I would say that they are libertarian radicals, although not as radical as the flat earthers
its easier to dismiss data when you distrust the entire government, which to some extend we do
People are actually advocating for the banning of anti-vaxxers
banning of them?
umm what does that mean? sending them to gulags?
deporting them?
I think that that is a bad idea
but the parents DO need to be more educated somehow
its just a difficult problem
I was thinking make vaccinations a In-School thing and if parents want to opt out they have to come for a briefing class on vaccinations
I think that works fine?
yeah, as long as the number of anti-vaxxers is low enough
it won't be too much of a problem
if only you knew..
😔
It's funny ... because the proponents of climate change also say that science doesn't function as a democracy. That what is published in peer-reviewed papers need to be taken seriously. Lol.
Why wouldn't we tackle global dimming instead of global warming? Making Earth Shiny Again would help with global warming as well, because light radiation of Sun is reflected back to space before it turns to infrared wavelengths (which are prevented from exiting Earth by CO2). Cover your house in tinfoil.
It will also reduce air conditioning costs and CO2 from it's use.
Tinfoil wouldn't withstand heavy rain, even if weren't gonna tear it apart just to stop the noise it would make (during rains)
Why do people who want to reduce CO2 ever suggest anything other than planting trees?
Trees have been keeping CO2 levels down for many thousands of years, why would we trust the government to come up with something new
I wasn't entirely serious.
You could manage the climate and increase the amount of cloud cover (especially over the oceans and where shade is preferred).
I know that's still experimental, but it's just that people don't want to talk about it.
There is a country that actually has negative carbin emissions. They think it might have to do with their constitution saying 60% of the country needs to be forest or something like that.