The all or nothing way of thinking is tied to being fanatical

I dont think theres any dishonesty in that part.

Rather, blind faith in a tenent of life

If someone wants to blame things on Jews, do they ignore all the contributions made to society be Jews?

Perhaps it shows an inability to accept the imperfections of humanity

Hence the thinking that the utopia could be built if only humanity would do things a certain, different way

In my expirence exceptional they usually claim the jews stole things and presented them as their own work

That everyone has to be one side or the other?

picking sides = tribalism

sometimes killing the real inventors in the process, other times just buying/burrying them

I mean thats what the BLM say about white inventions as well.

Take another's contrubutions and pass it off as your own

Or in this case, rewrite history

Good call, probably not dishonest in most cases, intellectually autistic, neurotically focused on the "ultimate root problem" which perpetuates the tunnel vision

That didnt work so well, so they repainted themselves as the oppressed

Damnit Einstein, stealing someones notes

Like youve seen how much the internet likes tesla

And how his work was stolen

Youve seen those posters of him with his tongue out, hes clearly laughing at the black man he stole his work from

I meant as a Jew even

The internet loves rooting for the underdog

Especially if they have no stake in it

Exchange black for aryan and youve corssed the political divide

But I hate when the underdog becomes the new KING OF GARBAGE.

I've seen it happen and it makes me sad.

underdog assumes that there is a competition

Usually what happens with the internet is that they get a single meme of a thing

A person, place or invention and then they go crazy over it

Well, in the 2016 election we have 2 underdogs in their own right

Very little risk in rooting for a historical underdog, so brave

A man with no political power, whose never been in politics. And a women

Maybe they read wikipedia about the article, but i dobut anyone actually looks into it beyond that

I meant political experience

Well it makes you look virtuous

Fighting for the "little man"

I'd say that is diminutive because navigating corporate seas is awfully political, however inept he my seem, there is no way he's flying completely blind

Makes it all the more silly doing it after the conflict has been resolved

I say that cause people were saying he wasnt qualified

And the main reason for that being that he has never held political office.

I don't think demographics can have underdogs

Unlike hillary who is pleanty "expereinced"