but because theyll learn they get hurt going into your yard

i'd do it in secret and my mom would later be like "why aren't there shit tons of rabbits in our yard anymore?"

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

lol

say migration

problem solved

lmao

it's not even that they bother me or anything

i dont even know what rabbits *do*

eat gardens, poop and breed mostly

well we do have a stack of hay in the yard with a target on it because we got my little cousins toy bows for their birthday and we had some fun with em

so i already have a range lol

Rabbits don't poop!!

They make milk balls.

Prepping for easter.

fuck easter

i'll be sittin in my chair outside, waitin for that easter bunny bastard to come onto my property. he's gon' git what's comin to 'im

🤠

i tell you hwat

anyways i was also looking a uh... *softcore* forms of self protection, i.e. bb guns or whatever, not because i feel in danger out in rural california, but just because it's better to be safe than sorry

wait i just remembered theres a firearms chat

my b

I mean if you want a non lethal form of protection being fit is probably the best option

My solution is the same as always

Sick backflips.

You cant just backflip your way out of everything

😏

...I just study comatatus and other weapon base martial arts. I can already hit pretty hard, but give me a pipe or large stick and I can win while not killing the man.

maybe i'll try the backflip method 🤔

san fran.. why does that not surprise me https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/1029231140060557312?s=20

So it has nothing to do with any actual skill

Subjective skill. Don't really see why anyone would care that some people somewhere decided to do something silly.

Social media has become an issue.
They are already receiving or have received funding from the government.
The courts already deemed Donald Trumps twitter feed a public forum... would that not mean Twitter and by extension all social media’s would be a public forum? Or public square?

Wouldn’t that make them obliged to follow and be ruled by the doctrines of the first amendment?

Am I reaching or is this a common train of thought

Ancient aliens... https://twitter.com/newscientist/status/1029322872081264640?s=20

@GodOfMercy (Jack) that makes sense to me, what's the point of rights if big companies walk all over them

@tmg copper that’s what I was thinking... I’m about to write a piece for my uni course about this but I feel like the people I would talk to in Australia don’t quite grasp the meaning, importance or weight of the social media tyranny that is taking place

Are we talking about regulating companies?

There's an argument to be made to regulate companies that infringe on your civil rights

@Grenade123 I’m talking about holding them to the same standards as the government as they’re the modern public square.
I’m talking about evolving laws to evolve with modern technology and if Mark Cuckerberg is able to undermine the rights of Americans and everyone in the world via excluding them from the public square with their own personal set of rules.

I’d say that’s an argument to hold them to the same standards. They are monopolistic and tyranny by private company is still tyranny