If you see Beemann arguing with me, they're wrong.

well its like saying do you want to rape a million babies or a thousand babies, and the anarchist position would be a thousand babies because thats preferable

its stupid

It's a value proposition, would you rather

Hrmm..

I would rather that fewer babies got raped

https://i.imgur.com/x9dUvCu.jpg

I don't think that's a hard sell

Well, which babies

They could be very foul-tempered babies

I don't care about the identity of the babies

I'm not talking identity I'm talking attitude.

Geez.

That's for the alt right and post modernists to agonize over

Baby attitude goes in the same bucket

but i dont even think the questions are usually framed that way "would you rather" or "which option is less evil"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTCQpjUrCe8&vl=en

I mean that's a good tempered baby.

Yes, and that's fine

Spare them the rape if possible.

You want the least evil option. That's not a lie

I'm a minarchist though, and thus your most devious nemesis :^)

The ultimatum is rather stupid but

If the consequence was "Either way, you extinguish evil in the universe"

Then it's suddenly a very serious question

trying to find an example of what i mean

Well the original question was national vs global government, neither of which necessarily has to be viewed as evil

If you think worldwide unity is the most important goal, then maybe a global government is your goal as well, and crushing nations is extinguishing evil. I find it baffling, but people do adhere to that thought process

like for example they could ask something about your cultural values and then assume that you want to enforce your cultural opinion through laws

and pin you as this type of authoritarian

Don't answer based on personal values

Just on legal

It's asking about the political, not philosophical

Man I am so glad I changed the quote for my password. Shit was too long

A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they will never sit in.

like "do you think being homosexual is natural" and then assume you want to ban gay marriage or something

Wait, do you think it's unnatural?

i dont really know, lets say i did, that would not mean that i would want to regulate what people do in their bedrooms

No, it doesn't necessarily

I think encouraging gay marriage sorta decreases gay marriage in the future. o:

I don't think that homosexuality contributes to the human race, no.