Message from @zutt

Discord ID: 484250535751581697


2018-08-29 06:24:33 UTC  

Over the years they look at the same process from multiple disciplines and all of them came to same conclusion

2018-08-29 06:24:47 UTC  

At least in general direction

2018-08-29 06:27:18 UTC  

I guess agree to disagree. The only graphs and data that are realiable are measured from pre-industrial 1900 to now, when we could actually gauge through ice samples what the atmo was wayyy longer ago. When talking about ice ages, the earth couldn't go through that and not have some significant changes that would effect the PH of oceans, ice drift/melt and land mass.

2018-08-29 06:27:58 UTC  

We're using insufficient data that is only a tiny blip of time in comparison.

2018-08-29 06:29:14 UTC  

Its bad sample sizing, bad science

2018-08-29 06:29:28 UTC  

You keep looking at it just from one angle

2018-08-29 06:29:40 UTC  

Thats only part of the whole reaearch

2018-08-29 06:30:16 UTC  

yes, mostly cfc levels throughout time which are the supposed offender of all this

2018-08-29 06:31:06 UTC  

Well tbh to untangle this we would have to dive realy deep into this

2018-08-29 06:31:42 UTC  

too late in the night for that

2018-08-29 06:32:08 UTC  

It does not help that its not just one percess but multiple of them lel

2018-08-29 06:32:21 UTC  

Thays what makes it beautifully complicated

2018-08-29 06:33:23 UTC  

I think its hilarious how that was the same image i saw in my textbook, and the little red arrow says---->??? Ohy my, where am i going to go? Its laughable. There are distinct patterns.

2018-08-29 06:33:58 UTC  

Well the graphs are dangerous tbh

2018-08-29 06:34:18 UTC  

Lots of sites manipulates them one way or other

2018-08-29 06:34:28 UTC  

True

2018-08-29 06:36:56 UTC  

All I'm saying is, humans as we live today can't live in anything short of 300 cfcs or we'll start bitching about how many feet more/less of beach we have in miami. But it does change. It will never stay the same. And that top section where we're currently at is thousands of years represented. So way beyond any scientific annotations. We're talking biblical territory.

2018-08-29 06:37:48 UTC  

You mixed multiple issues in this time lel

2018-08-29 06:38:18 UTC  

I remember aljazeera report with female anouncer standing on beach and pointing on the sea

2018-08-29 06:38:44 UTC  

Saying how the say is eating the land on some island im caribean area

2018-08-29 06:39:10 UTC  

And claiming muh climate change

2018-08-29 06:39:23 UTC  

right, because of ice melt. gotcha

2018-08-29 06:39:31 UTC  

While the truth was that the island was on tectonic plate lol

2018-08-29 06:39:46 UTC  

And it was going under in that area

2018-08-29 06:39:50 UTC  

thats just shit luck

2018-08-29 06:39:54 UTC  

Yeah

2018-08-29 06:39:58 UTC  

Pretty much

2018-08-29 06:41:21 UTC  

thats another thing that is working against us, is the earth's surface. again, i just think its funny how humans no matter how smart they are think they can sustain things here and there won't be any change

2018-08-29 06:42:21 UTC  

Well now we are getting to another area

2018-08-29 06:42:39 UTC  

How politicians make policies

2018-08-29 06:42:51 UTC  

And thats fucked up in the extreme

2018-08-29 06:42:59 UTC  

And corupted

2018-08-29 06:43:32 UTC  

True

2018-08-29 06:43:32 UTC  

Like its absolutely true there is huge "eco" industry making money on stupid ideas

2018-08-29 06:43:35 UTC  

So you're saying we need to colonize mars?

2018-08-29 06:43:42 UTC  

moin moin

2018-08-29 06:43:49 UTC  

Eventualy yes

2018-08-29 06:44:08 UTC  

--How exactly is it easier to terraform Mars than to repair Earth?

2018-08-29 06:44:11 UTC  

I'm not too educated on global warming but I'll parrot whatever side gets me some sweet space travel, because with space travel comes mecha

2018-08-29 06:44:27 UTC  

Eventually humans need to leave our planet