Message from @pratel

Discord ID: 485220277622669323


2018-08-31 22:37:37 UTC  

For example: If you accept that Blacks have *on average* darker skin tones than whites, you're a race realist.

2018-08-31 22:38:44 UTC  

Thing is what you do after that. And my reaction woudl be "yes, and?"

2018-08-31 22:39:20 UTC  

Whatever you believe I think academia is at fault for not being honest about this sort of shit for so long relegating all of these sorts of discussions away from the venues where they could be had responsibly

2018-08-31 22:40:02 UTC  

People usually use RR in re: to IQ

2018-08-31 22:41:11 UTC  

True but that shouldn't be a reason to stop reasearching this shit.

2018-08-31 22:41:47 UTC  

and one of those things is to research why there are differences or not...

2018-08-31 22:41:58 UTC  

Sure

2018-08-31 22:42:33 UTC  

Part of it is testing itself. I got to mess with an ethnonat at one point via the Flynn Effect

2018-08-31 22:43:31 UTC  

Agreed.

2018-08-31 22:45:55 UTC  

and why do we even care about that race shit??

2018-08-31 22:46:23 UTC  

especially why protect people for their behaviour?

2018-08-31 22:46:47 UTC  

Some people can not see beyond Race.

2018-08-31 22:47:07 UTC  

Yes and?

2018-08-31 22:47:19 UTC  

And people are stupid

2018-08-31 22:47:45 UTC  

But not me, I'm the only non-stupid person in existence. You can trust me on this because I'm smart.

2018-08-31 22:48:13 UTC  

Its one thing to talk shit about races another is to act on it.

2018-08-31 22:48:27 UTC  

So again, we are at the Thoughtcrime level here.

2018-08-31 22:49:10 UTC  

To quote Dracula (1929) They're crazy, they are all crazy, except me and you. And some times I have me doubts about you..."

2018-08-31 22:49:39 UTC  

@Schedrevka *tips fedora* ah I see you are an enlightened individual like myself

2018-08-31 22:51:58 UTC  

In response to the "Vox Argues..." Timcast video: The "you oppose us and you are on the right" has been an argument used in sociology circles for as long as I've been around. If you read any of those journals you'll see the "right-wing" adjective thrown around everywhere.

2018-08-31 22:52:09 UTC  

It's hardly new.

2018-08-31 22:52:14 UTC  

It just wasn't mainstream.

2018-08-31 23:03:20 UTC  

China should be sanctioned

2018-08-31 23:04:45 UTC  

actually - I don't see how germany has not placed sanctions on China yet

2018-08-31 23:05:18 UTC  

if you think a country is so dangerous that you cannot send chinese citizens to china for fear of government opressing them - then how is it moral to continue trading with them

2018-08-31 23:05:26 UTC  

China must fall

2018-08-31 23:09:31 UTC  

Because we in the west live with an incredibly comfortably priced goods thanks to cheaper & under regulated labor produced in Asia & Africa, & we are willing to let it slide...

2018-08-31 23:09:54 UTC  

da, I'm not sure that view is completely accurate

2018-08-31 23:10:11 UTC  

let me find something

2018-08-31 23:10:25 UTC  

correct, the market would stablize without cheap labor

2018-08-31 23:10:39 UTC  

it would force other improvements to technology and research to counteract those

2018-08-31 23:10:55 UTC  

i.e. the world isn't going to stop because people live in shitty conditions working

2018-08-31 23:12:40 UTC  

> In fact, foreign investment is only good for an economy if it brings needed technological or managerial innovation or if that economy cannot otherwise raise funding for domestic productive investment. If neither holds — and they hold in developing economies only, not advanced countries like the United States — foreign investment always forces the recipient country to choose between a higher debt burden and higher unemployment.

2018-08-31 23:13:12 UTC  

> As long as the United States is the only country willing and able to run the current account deficits that result from foreign accumulation of dollars, the dollar will be the only important global reserve currency. And as long as other economies try to goose domestic growth or reduce domestic unemployment by forcing up exports relative to imports, either U.S. debt will be higher or U.S. growth will be lower and unemployment higher. This is why the United States will eventually limit foreigners from accumulating dollars for their reserves.

2018-08-31 23:13:25 UTC  

> The logic is inexorable. As the global economy grows relative to that of the United States, it is only a matter of time before Washington is forced into defensive action. The only question is how much economic pain and domestic unemployment the United States is willing to accept before it acts. As long as the dollar is easy to acquire in near-unlimited amounts, foreign countries with weak domestic demand can simply buy dollars and force their domestic demand deficiencies onto their trading partners. Until then, it doesn’t matter whether or not the People’s Bank tries to improve the SDR’s visibility. It is entirely against China’s economic interests for the SDR to replace the dollar — let alone for the renminbi to do so.

2018-08-31 23:13:32 UTC  

LotheronPoole, sure the world isn't going to stop because people live in terrible working conditions, if it did, then sociaty would have hit multiple standstills through out history.