OMG! LOL its crazy how all these nasa scientists hide the truth from us!!!

LOL the moon is not fake but when they said we went to it and showed that footage of neil armstrong, that was fake

well not if it was a ball like nasa say, the rocket would slip off the edge into the void

DONT BE FOOLED!! that is a ploy to make them money

they prey off the ignorance of the general public

YES!!

they think they r so smart for discovering all these new things but they still cant hide the truth from folk like us!

exactly. they spend all that money on trying to leave earth rather than trying to fix it

SIX

wow what a load of trife!!!

it is obviously fake because the earth is encompassed by what they call a gravity dome so even light couldnt get out there

source??

GOOGLE!! They are also trying to hide the trut, i dont believe just any old trife i read on the internet

source??

yeah like this

ah darn i cant send the link

well what flat earth model do you belive then?

where we are moving up at 9.8m/s?

just curious, i need to go to my local library to research that model more but it doesnt sound plausible to me

yeah but you dont know that for real

well, im yet to see a source of this 'truth'

exactly

nothimg wrong with dome star projection

concave dont make sense cause then we would all fall to the middle no?

the stars could be painted on a dome like the truman show

Dont vaccinate

He earth be a concave dish

Nasa are praying off our globular ignorance

hello

@Czepa nah just cba with his life story

have you seen GOT? there is obviously a huge wall of ice that encompasses the earth which we cant climb

got isn't on netflix and nah i dont believe any of this, this is just what they think

im curious to see how they think though

social anthropology assignment aha

was talking to them earlier and they think that ashkenazi jews are behind it all

and basically all zionists

but hitler was bad despite killing them? they are pretty swung on the subject

just dont mention jews

lol

btw the other 'planets' are just lights in the sky, you cant visit them and they dont exist as objects. source? flat earthers

shut up sket

i need to infiltrate some feminist discords next

yeah voice calls there would be class. this discord has some chill people but their logic is wack

i felt like louis theroux when i was asking them questions

he is

yes! he should interview some flat earthers

and evangelical christians

its crazy to see how sceptical these people are of *everything* i mean, fair enough but if i ever reached a point where i questioned the very basis of astronomy which has been around for thousands of years id go insane aha

aha true that meme has enlightened me to the truth

yeah me too im quite liberal i just like seeing others perspectives

top quality proof i am swayed

true people in science should always agree with one another

/s

thats kinda why i came here but its all memes and anti semitism lol

and globophobia

ahah

fair enough, if you cant physically see something then it cant be observed??

ok

fear of reality

but if i do find one then NASA have conspired against you and nothing is true

i know buddy

silence the people that argue with you? wow, more immature than i thought

mute me too now

sure if you guys cant have a civil discussion then go for it

it is impossible to be completely impartial, for instance you have a bias toward the flat earth

now that is closed minded, completely shutting down the counter argument can lead you down a rabbit hole of misinformation

if you just silence those that dispute you, you are the same as the way you view NASA keeping the public out of the loop

well i agree with you on that, i am here to try and see your guys view on this and you aren't really showing you are mature by muting people and dismissing me

fair enough, but from our point of view it is *you* that is deluded, and i dont mean to be insulting condescending but we wanted to discuss

see thats the thing, im not here to dispute what you claim, just to see the sort of psychology behind it if you will. part of a social anthropology assignment

its incredibly interesting to me that you guys completely distrust established organisations like nasa and governments, just want an insight

sorry, you cherry pick information which suits your claim but discredit other things (the blue marble springs to mind) therefor you can't really claim to be unbiassed can you?

not an argument from incredulity, just wondering why certain information is distrusted while ^^ info is.

well in my physics class, equations are often simplified to exclude air resistance and things of the sort as they are negligible at such scales, much like how i imagine that that equation you posted is, to simplify it as factoring in the earths rotundity and rotation is not neccessary

yeah i agree in as much as gravity doesn't exist but current physics models including those presented by einstein suggest its effects are observed due to space-time curvature

no, but its effects can be observed. much the same as you don't witness a murder but can still use evidence to find the killer

which is why it is presented as a theory. i know you folks hate theories, but the whole point of them is to create a predictive model of our existence to benefit humanity. All the science greats were not tripped by the dunning krueger effect, they realised how little they knew despite their theories working

your argument is flawed, i cant see the earth form therefor it never happened. i cant see jesus, therefor he didnt exist.

theories have predictive capability, thats why we can create a model which will accurately predict the weather a day from now. its based on theory, yet the calculations work

although if you erased all religious texts then they would never be recreated the exact same way. destroy science textbooks however and people will figure it out again

you are right, the meme has beat me. why continue

nice bait

explain the weather phenomenon i described above then, how can we accurately predict weather if it is based on particle physics which is theoretical

not changing the subject at all scroll up friend and you will see you dodged my point entirely and posted a meme

suppose you can just mute me when you are tired of hearing a counter argument

yes recognition of particle collision, which is based on theory

dont worry they told me you can photoshop images that have a curved earth to look flat because the camera doesnt capture it correctly

fact

show me an image of the flat earth taken from space which isnt photoshopped...

ok

gg