lol vaccines work

deal with it

proof

1: some random article from 'naturalnews.com' isn't proof

2: the study they liked doesn't even show what the articles claims it does

have you even read it

How does it say that vaccines 'cause' measles

It says that 'recipients of measles virus-containing vaccine experience rash and fever which maybe indistinguishable from measles'

And it even says that it is in 5% of cases

How is that 'most'

nice photoshop lol

From the insert: Because these events are re ported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.

That is a list of what people claim it causes not of the real effects

Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.

'reported' adverse rections

I'm readint through the papers now

The 1st one is just a link to the abstract so I can't comment on the probably broken methodology

All of the papers end with 'more research is needed'

all your evidence is getting increasingly worse

at the start you posted an actual study

then you post a picture of an isert

then you post a random clip from the 60s

how is this even considered evidence

??

this whole server is a joke

everyone is retarted

prove me wrong

i have 900000 iq kid shut up

give me admin or I will hack this server

right now