fun fact: they don't

explain why antartica doesn't have 3 hour days year round?

common sense? something you clearly dont have

during winter in the northern hemisphere, it does

flat earther logic: i am going to cherry pick until i can make an argument, but when i start loosing the arguement, i will say that they are just brainwashed

NOPE

thats chem

yup

#salt

well your latitude is curved, which is not correct

rings of latitude do not curve

btw, latitude means latteral which is a straight line

but then you lost a couple braincells (this is just a joke)

if you walk exactly west on the equator, it will never turn

walking along the equator, west is always a straight line

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-moonlight-reduce-temperature

give this a read

it will explain why moonlight appears cooler than shaded areas

a hypothesis is needed for the scientific method, but the hypothesis doesn't need to be correct

you don't need your masters degree to understand the earth is a globe

that is true, then you remodel your hypothesis to account for the error, then test it

flat earth PHD, i want you to check out the youtuber "SciManDan, then debunk each of his videos.

because if the earth is flat, then you should be able to

debunk him then

SO?

debunk his stuff then

if you don't, then you're too scared to

well, he makes extremely good points, researches, and debunks each thing thrown at him

because he's done it all on youtube

you don't need to debate, you can disprove

you don't need to debate to prove gravity

and if you say gravity is actually buoyancy, like many other FE people, then explain why gravity is literally used to calculate buoyancy

simple grade 10 logic can disprove everything to do with the FE model

what they don't realize, is that gravity isn't a force, its an acceleration that causes a force

space, if you want to be technical

and the stars

broccoli, and a radish?

um... kay

i lost too many IQ points...

ok, first of all, FE people cant make up their mind on their model

the earth is too big to see any noticable curve

flat earth doesn't explain seasons, lunar eclipses, accurate day-night cycles, high and low tides

they can't even solve the most fundamental proof possible, gravity

go jump, gravity

gravity is an acceleration, causing you to accelerate towards the earth

oh ya, FE can't explain moon phases either

exept there is

then why cant i see paris?

or large towers?

becuase they are below the horizon

because the earth is too big to see curve when you are that low

if i could post pictures, and actually have a chance to explain, i would be able to actually disprove all of that

🍒 👌

cherry pickers

oml. just because NASA uses a fish eye lens doesn't mean they lie

they never claimed that it proves that the earth is a globe you bonehead

you can't just take a picture and say thats enough proof that the earth is flat

way to just throw insults

ok, what is gravity on a FE model?

im not going to bother answering, because you're not explaining your observers elevation

ok, may i ask one thing, why can i not see other landmasses from a beach by the ocean, because if there wasn't any curve, wouldn't i see more landmasses?

well, say i had a telescope, and zoomed in as much as possible, then wouldn't i be able to see other landmasses? because i can see other planets with a telescope

why is exactly half of the earth illuminated by the sun? because the FE model would only illuminate about 1/3 of the earth at any given time

as well as Antarctica does get 24+ hours of daylight during summer in the southern hemisphere, which is impossible on the FE model

antartica, the south pole

also, how would earths magnetic field work on a FE model?

but the south pole would be impossible

magnets are dipoles, it would litterally be impossible for there to be a southern magnetic pole on the FE model

there are litterally spherical magnets used as toys

it seems as one force, but they still have a dipole

a positive and a negative end

di meaning 2, and pole meaning pole

hence, dipole means two poles

north and south, + and -

https://www.amazingmagnets.com/c-79-spherical-magnets.aspx

spherical magnets are dipoles

there is no magnet that is a singular pole

the earth is a dipole

which supports the globe

why is it wrong?

the magnetic fields follow the sphere

in a circular pattern

says you...

if i could post images i would

a north pole DOES require a south pole

@Ippo care to explain what replaces gravity then?

@Citizen Z thats how magnets work

if there is no gravity, then density is irrelevent

and by what you're saying, gravity is just buoyancy, correct?

@Ippo are you saying gravity is really just buoyancy?

watch out, they may bring in the slinky

alex, very good point, if you strictly account for density as gravity, things would just go up

proof?

gravity is the bend of space-time, causes by 2 or more masses

IQ this morning: at least 70. IQ after this conversation: -70

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDy95_eNPzM
if you can truly disprove all globe earth arguments, then you could certainly debunk every point in this video

or look at all of SciManDans flat earth friday videos

oml, its not pseudoscience if its actually proven

I understand what that picture is trying to explain, but it is incorrect, if you measure the elevation at each point, it is still sea level. Which is zero

That's what gravity is for