but @H8mz88 was questioning how the "globe" earth was formed if gravity existed

yeah

"how is the globe earth formed"

so?

i just explained it to you

the reason I use gravity as a way to challenge the flat earth theory is because it's a sound theory, and hasn't been disproven yet

you're welcome, i guess

propaganda?

and forced downwards where?

so what about the sun then?

and that's a similar theory to gravity, but without the universal application that gravity has

how does it move?

if you say it does

and what about the other planets?

and the moon?

ah

i'll be honest, it's impossible to completely debunk the idea of a flat earth

of course not

but i've seen both

and the "round" earth theory gives a perfectly legitimate explanation for how they move

yeah

it's just that to me, the round earth theory seems more supported

but you can't completely prove either beyond doubt

short of us all going to space and seeing the earth from there

it's the same with religion

which is why it's far harder for an athiest to believe in the flat earth theory

i was just wondering how you supported your beliefs

*right*

*my bad*

*should have checked the description*

yeah

the round earth theory is supported by science as well

same here

it's interesting

it is

it's interesting to know why people think what they do as well

ie. why the earth is flat

we were just discussing if the earth was flat

and why/why not

sorry?

yeah

yeah

all true

it's just what a lot of flat earthers say to justify their "hypothesis"

huh?

huh

nice

but everything is based on possibility

what you believe is almost always based on what makes most sense

obviously

i'm not a flat earther

to them it does

obviously, to most people, a globe earth makes far more sense

because of gravity and all that

but they're all theories technically

which is why we can't *prove* it without actually going to space

exactly

well

*many* things

but yeah

you could even say that

technically, i guess

true

but it's all a matter of perspective

the different is that priest didn't back up their words with some form of evidence

or at least logical explanations

yeah

exactly

science has accounted for so many developments in the world that claiming that it's all "a lie" makes no sense

what is?

that science is false?

or a lie?

i have used them before

gravity is a pretty good one for a start

i've already had a debate about this

if you really want, i can explain it all again

ok

and besides, the main point was that many flat earthers use "scientists lying" as an argument to deflect any valid argument relating to science

*good question*

*so*

*should trump be impeached?* (supposedly the question of the day)

yeah

as do i

that's true

sorry?

that's funny, considering that most flat earthers i've come across use religion as a defence when science and logic fails them

alright then

gravity

so?

it's not though

but they were named long ago

the wars?

hang on

what is this debate about?

the war or the earth?

ah

ah

right

but just because theories may have been created by religious figures, it doesn't mean that they haven't been expanded on and made more feasible

huh?