ok but changes in the nervous system or cardiovascular system would have to be tiny in order to not fail. It would take so long. Longer than millions of years.

with the odds presented and the fact that the changes would have to be so small it would take longer than millions of years

it would take longer than that. Tiny minuscule changes that would not occur every generation. Maybe not in several generations. Then you have the case where the change would fail or be problematic and the creature would die. Then you'd be back to waiting for another generation with a change. The odds are against it.

ok but the problem with not taking the Bible literally is that it undermines the entire religion. The catholics may believe in evolution, but by doing so they are undermining their religion. The Bible gives us an eye witness account of creation whereas evolution has no eye witness accounts. There are so many holes in the evolution argument. The transitional bones you mentioned earlier, aren't actually transitional bones. They are simply bone variations. How do you explain DNA? how does human DNA just appear from monkeys? The theory of evolution keeps changing too. They keep saying the earth is older and older they don't have a set age. They can't figure it out.

except for the fact that I believe in creation so the religion isn't crumbling we find the problem in evolution and the answer that keeps on changing... how old is the earth? evolutionists can't give you an answer

ok but the radiometric dating has proven to be flawed and not accurate

but they have though research the flaws with radiometric dating they are obvious.

But when they already know how old something is and radiometric date it and it says its about a million years older I would say that's flawed

Ok but lets say they all are proven to be flawed... then what?

the question is has anyone witnessed the beginning of earth? So technically speaking (if we are not counting creation) then this is all just speculation. Both opinions are wrong. We don't have any evidence for either.

Like God

I think they have a lot of faith

supposedly

can they?

but every time I research evolution I see holes

no but it does mean evolution isn't right either

never said they equal God I said they just make me doubt evolution

millions of pieces of data that all either contradict one another or are not what they seem.

ok so a scientist can recreate it in a lab. there wasnt a scientist years ago fiddling with the DNA of ants or whatever. They "did it on their own"

alright so if they did it on their own like i said it would take longer than scientists say how old the earth is

I still see the words "may suggest" which sounds like speculation

evolution is a theory exactly. It's not proven.

alright still a theory is not the end result. Scientists still can't provide us with an end result.

no but they can't confirm it

maybe not but it does mean that it isn't fact

ok well you still won't admit to it being a fact. You are saying basically

i guess that's your opinion. I personally rely on the Bible as an eye witness testimony to creation and a young earth. We just have different opinions

so does mine i've provided it for you.

God is my eye witness but yet again, you won't take that as an arguement because you don't believe in God

I love that book

You should read the case for Christ and the Case for a Creator it's good

just so you understand why we believe what we believe

it's proven that we are all related lol I mean

I don't know what to tell you

ya it has

look it up

there are articles that even accidentally prove that

find one based off of Christianity also

there are genealogies in the Bible too that helps lol

lol

shes pretending XD

yes kitchen duty

ahah the cow

it was a vibe guys

lmao

of this...

XD

dang

too bad

we are still listening to thsi

dang

lol ik ik

you just appreciate them is that what you mean?

I don't really know if that's immoral... huh

can anyone here help me with some math? I just have a few quick questions

its algebra 2

the question is what will f(g(x)) and g(f(x)) equal if the functions are inverse? and the answers are 0, -1, x, and 1

ahah all good thanks for trying \:)

ok thank you I thought it was x but I think i'm always wrong so I like to check thank you so much!

i go there all the time \:)

dude your so good

uh anyone have a calculator i could get on my computer that does logarithms... my calculator died and I lost the charger...

thank you guys! I'd probably fail math if it wasn't for this channel

oo pog good job!

what math do you usually learn logarithms in

cuz I feel like I shouldn't be learning them

huh im in algebra 2

huh ok because I feel really out of my league lol

me too nice