https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvnCwWOuzk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvnCwWOuzk

@xXPuppyLoverXx You think every "meteor" that made those craters on the moon, hit the moon dead on? Why, according to you, did none of the meteors hit the moon at an angle to create a rift like crater instead?

@xXPuppyLoverXx You don't know, you are speculating and just regurgitating the excuse that others have made. Computer modeling can show anything you want it to. Look at what NIST did with the 9/11 event.

Do you believe the NIST computer models of 9/11 and the world trade center buildings that fell, along with building 7? @xXPuppyLoverXx

It is relevant because you trust in computer models made by other people. It is a perception test.

I think it is weird that computer models suggest that building 7 and the twin towers fell due to 2 planes crashing into 2 buildings.

Why are you dodging the question Puppy?

Reminds me of white rabbit with the black rabbit.

Its relevant, because you trust in computer models made by other people.

You can make a computer model say anything.

Why do the NIST models match the mainstream narrative so well?

You think 2 planes can knockdown 3 steel framed buildings?

You are bringing up computer models, it is the only reason why I ask.

I think that makes the NIST computer models regarding 9/11 relevant.

I disagree, they both used physics and mechanics to justify their results, but I understand if you don't want to talk about it.