Answering what?

What was that?

No, but I never claimed Italian citizenship. I'm fairly young and can relearn my ancestral culture after breaking free of American materialism.

@Bunyip Forza Nuova seems like a good party

CasaPound has moved a little too far in the direction of socialistic humanism, I'm afraid

Yes

I mean the type of thinking that Muslims and blacks should be sent back where they came from because the capitalists are exploiting them

It's disingenuous and stupid

There are no capitalists in their home countries

It's just barbarism

They haven't gotten to capitalism yet

Of course

Some of the Arab peoples were fairly advanced, specifically the Levantine ones, but the convergence of interest between Israel, the USA, and Saudi Arabia has lowered them to the level of animals

It's rather tragic

The correct fascist response to modern mass-migration, in my opinion, is send them back where they came from, then colonize them

After 5 generations under the benevolent yoke of a superior civilization, they might be made into something

Just because the British did it doesn't mean it's not entirely in the character of other peoples

Italian colonial policy in Ethiopia and Eritrea agrees with it

Because of the British and Bolshevism

@NokiaLord

Leninist anti-imperialist nonsense and dogmatic Anglophobia has corrupted you

Caudillo agrees with me, you realize

(To everyone else, Caudillo is someone you probably have never spoken to)

Yes

Hold on

I've got to leave again

@NokiaLord What about members of those groups which were Christianized?

You realize that I am promoting Christianization as one of several goals in colonization

And the idea is not exclusive to the British that you so despise, as said before. If anything, I would say that it is entirely within the character of Latinate civilizations to do as much

And "constant oppression" is just a pejorative used by libertarians who oppose the idea that the state must exert a total discipline over the human personality.

(As a side note, Veers also agrees with me, but now I see how you got so highly placed in Farkasfalka at least)

@Natio Again, I can tell we're going to be good friends

@MawLr It's also to improve the moral character of man, obviously

You don't even believe that these ethnic groups have souls if I've estimated you properly. @Bunyip

You're a cretin who's read one book by a neo-fascist and figures that he knows everything

@MawLr Let's say the objective is to save the souls of pagan barbarians. How would that contradict me?

I am not advocating doing things how the Anglos did

So what on Earth is your problem?

Where is the point of disagreement?

You mention Spaniards in Mexico

They changed the nature of the Indian through Christianity and diffusion of civilization, yes?

There you go

Then your disagreement is with Nokia

I know nothing of Mexican indigenes

I'm arguing from the operational premises of Nokia's argument

Firstly to understand why he's accusing me of being a misbegotten Anglophile when I am anything but

@NokiaLord Also, Veers got put on a hate watchlist by a Soros creature, so he is obviously more than just a "cultural snob"

And I thought you two were pals

He's an anti-Semite

In the religious sense

So what about Jews who convert to Catholicism? Are they Jews or Christians in your view?

Or are they just good at baccarat?

So then you too are a religious anti-Semite

I fail to understand

There is a difference between anti-Judaism and religious anti-Semitism. You fall in the latter category

Any liberal cosmopolitan philosemite can criticize the Jewish religion

You know this

But you don't hate them when they become Christian

There is a discrepancy at work

If you hate their race, then why does their religion matter? Are they not just as foul after as before?

Would they not be automatically fakers or defiling your faith by presuming to join it?

I'm trying to get at Nokia's reasoning out of personal curiosity

Yes, but that's not relevant. The Jew is still a Jew by the phenotypic traits commonly associated with his ethnicity

Regardless of whether he's a Catholic, a Jew by religion, an atheist, or a member of the Church of Monday Night Football

But it objectively does not define their race

Because a Jew is still a member of the Jewish race if he's Catholic

Yes

I know you don't just hate Jews for their religion

I'm saying that you hate Jews on religious grounds instead of grounds of biological determinism

Then you're a religious anti-Semite

Case closed

Of course

But unless if the reason you hate the Jews is rooted intrinsically in their biology, then you're exactly how I'm describing you

So what's the argument

Someone tell me the argument

I don't understand what I'm being disagreed with on here

I'm being accused of narcissism

Great

I know

Back to the previous topic, since this was all a waste of time...

No

I'm an anti-Semite

My pfp was a biological anti-Semite

Roberto Farinacci

Il Ras

I know

Nokia was arguing that his reasons for being an anti-Semite were not religious in nature

But then he explained them

And they were

Making this all a big miscommunication

A lot of people here miscommunicate, I feel

Back to the previous topic, I don't understand why Nokia objects to my love for imperialism and colonialism. To me, it's because he's a semi-Leninist.

Sure, to exert control over subject peoples, you have to use the most brutal organized violence possible

Get rid of a few dozen ethnic tribes though, preferably the more vicious and resistant, and the rest will never challenge you

Then improvement to the state of civilization can be made. Natality policies in the homeland are also good with that.

And yet you seem to think they can embrace Christianity autonomously

Even though they're just savages left to themselves

Stop using this term "Angloness"

So you think they'll civilize themselves by inspiration?

Blacks?