Schlimmy Fongrel
Discord ID: 240289942872260610
43 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
Biden is a baby, he has everyone around him do work so he can sit in his office playing with chew toys
I don't understand how you guys think Trump is still in the right here! Like he literally led people to the Capitol and said he'd be right there with them, then he went to the W.H. to watch everything unfold. What would have happened if the mob actually got into the offices where the congresspeople were!? There would have been murders, then the verification of electors could not continue, and Trump would try to maintain his power without getting ANY vote certified (because that would require every state that already certified, to un-certify their votes, which would never happen). How can you still, even after this, be on that man's side? Don't get me wrong, I hate all the slimy politicians that you do, but this isn't on the level of "rumor has it that X politician planned Y terrible thing", it's all on video and I watched both the rally and aftermath, this is real, dark, authoritarian strong man shit going on. He even threw every one of his supporters that stormed the Capitol under the bus in that last speech he gave, a day after he released a speech calling them all "very special" people that he "loves". I genuinely think Trump did something unforgivable. I expected to find people going crazy about it here, but dissapointingly all the posts are just the same old shit... "Pelosi is terrible and look at this rumor about her possible conspiracy". No shit Pelosi is shitty, regardless of the validity of the rumors... Are NONE of you seriously considering that Trump's rally caused all of this and that potentially losing congresspeople's lives on the night of the vote certification could maybe be a bad thing!? It does not get more clear than this folks.
See, so how can I be the misinformed one, yet yโall say โI betโ and โprobablyโ. I do not use CNN or anything to get informed about the truth, but rather to get i formed on the leftโs news. Same with fox and OANN for the right.
Whereโd you get the info about the planted actors?
I understand the power and importance of free thought, donโt patronize me because you assume I watched certain news. I do however weigh educated guess over more... abstract guesses. For example you may think this was set up by ANTIFA because it is going to strengthen their base. I may say this was set up by Trump and his associates because there is video evidence of Trump saying to march to the Capitol and be strong and never concede, while Giulliani was right next to him saying more fighting words. Plus, IF security did NOT stop the mob, Trump would have benefited a lot, it just failed, so he doesnโt see that benefit. I am aware that rhetoric affects behavior of supporters and I based my guess on what I saw, so my โguessโ seems more reasonable.
Opening the gates is a form of crowd control when a mob is pushing. Now as to how I think Trump should have done the rally to get the โbest outcomeโ. He shouldnโt have held it. He had two months to โstop the stealโ, that was his time to โensure the best outcomeโ, a rally at this time and with the rhetoric he used was not going to accomplish anything beyond more hate and violence.
GIVE ME THE FACIAL RECOGNITION DATA... oh right Washington Times corrected their article
He called for a peaceful protest, but foolishly used strong, fighting rhetoric. Ofc he didnโt say go and break shit, i know, i watched it
Not you
Alexander torri
Oh youโre right, thats my b
I learned it just from scholarly research and reading, but I found an article that talks about it: https://www.blockader.com/crowd-control-barricade-gates-and-arches/
I genuinely, fully understand storming the capitol... if I was absolutely certain that the government has rigged a democratic election, however since 60+ court cases failed, I do not believe it. You have the same info and only believe it because everyone is telling you itโs true and obvious, but the courts and all major world leaders and congress and even Pence now are saying the election was NOT rigged. I believe that against the word of a single Administration and itโs followers.
But even Trumpโs OWN judges dismissed the cases, does that not mean anything?
True tho
THEY ARE REAL JUDGES
You have no reason to believe otherwise BESIDES the fact that they didnโt rule the way you wanted or expected
Why do you know what a real judge does?
Okay
The cases were not dismissed before looking at the evidence, but I have seem many of the dismissals, by Trump appointed judges, they WERE dismissed because of a LACK of evidence. Look up hearsay
Hearsay is not evidence
Hearsay was the main arguments in most of the cases
NOT IN A COURT OF LAW, that would make the legal process unjust
They came forward because their dear Pres wanted them to come forward and kept saying that there was widespread fraud
If the signed affidavit says that the witness saw something suspicious, then no. If the witness brings forward evidence, then yes.
I am here because I have no intention of surrounding myself with people that agree with me. I know yโall disagree with me, and debate is important. Anyway I had a good time and now I have irl shit to get back to, thank yโall and Iโll hopefully be back ๐
I think our government sucks for other reasons... ๐
Small thing, but Alex Jones is not a reliable source for breaking things down. I have watched episodes where he uses a normal human voice, but he still has bouts of insanity and I donโt trust him. As for the other sources, the NYT article is based on a source that recognized them, but just *believes* they are right: โThe infiltrators were recognized due to their participation in New York City demonstrations, and were believed to have joined in the rioting so that Trump would get blamed, the source said.โ And then then end of the article calls out how the Washington Times article was false and misleading. The NewsMax article has a quote from the Rep. that the article is based on saying this: โโNow, whether these people who did the actual violence were antifa, or antifa plus Trump supporters, or only Trump supporters, or anarchists, or somebody else, we really need to wait until an investigation has been conducted, and not jump to conclusions when the evidence is incomplete.โโ Then the videos of people saying โno Antifaโ, how does that prove anything? Because some people saw others breaking windows and started chanting? That doesnโt mean the people were actually a part of antifa, itโs just that the chanters were more sensible than the ppl breaking windows and started booing the window breakers. And finally the last one doesnโt even prove the dude was a dem, he just didnโt vote. And thatโs assuming the tweet was true fact even tho it just shows an excel sheet that is severely clipped. Iโm not saying itโs false, just that it doesnโt prove he was antifa or anything, if it is true. Now before you respond, hear me out: I will believe anything, if there is enough evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Currently, the evidence makes me believe it was almost all Trump supporters causing mayhem at the capitol. I mean ultimately we have to wait, I just donโt think this evidence is substantial enough.
Oh shit, that was in response to Meiglos from yesterday
Yeah, i believe so, it would take tremendous evidence to prove otherwise
I think it was most likely a mix of extremists at the front lines (Q, PBs, maybe actors idk), then the VAST majority of ppl just kinda followed the crowd until they were standing in the capitol, and none of them understood wtf they were doing there.
What about a distraction? I havenโt heard about this.
I heard someone took Pelosiโs laptop, but idk anything beyond.
Yeah I agree Meiglos, whatever happened ended up putting a lot of peaceful Americanโs in a really bad situation just because the crowd was aided in gaining access. Itโs super fucked up for those people
Why is DC heavily guarded? Wym, itโs the center of the federal government
Yes, by the people who sent supporters to rough up congress
There were weapons found at the riot, could have gone very differently: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/alabama-man-charged-possession-eleven-molotov-cocktails-found-near-protest-us-capitol
But you donโt actually have proof that they are spies right? So ur just posting pictures of chinese people and are saying they give you CCP vibes?
Also, saying anyone is โtoo afraid to be racistโ is some dumb shit, fr
Yeah, but thatโs just it, โjustโ because they are chinese IS NOT enough reason to be suspicious of someone. If they are chinese and are caught SPYING then you could presume they are a chinese spy, but otherwise itโs just jumping to conclusions
Okay i will watch
Thatโs definitely true
yeah the thing at 10 min shows a guys face running past, no idea if he's secret service tho, even if he had a laptop. Plus it's just one guy and the video shows just his face for maybe a second, I wouldn't be so confident about what that proves. don't mean to be a shitter, just what I saw
43 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1