So does this Anti Christ know who he is?

Because I don't wanna think that it's just a random person lol

Since I don't want to be walking on a road while satan just says *yo im your dad now go make the world suffer*

Yes

Possibility.
Still frightening

Without proof, it's a claim.

With proof, it's a theory

With proof and confirmation, it's a fact.

And verify the witness.

I can claim that I saw demonic things in front of our street to gain attention ngl

Yes.

Btw what sect of Christianity are you following @CanadaBrah?

Having your own views in Christianity is basically inevitable

What you need is the belief and love.

Wdym by independent?

No sect, but full on living as a Christian?

That's nice, I can see you're a cool guy ngl @CanadaBrah

After all, it depends on perspective.

We will never be sure of who the right sect nor religion is, we're all taking our chances.

Yes, I would like that.

Bruh politicization of a religion again

Keep politics away from religion

It ain't helping

Yes we are aware of what the Ten Commandments are.

In fact, that's why the younger generation never meddles in Religion anymore.
It's being politicized, and they hate politics.

Ngl we should make people believe in God by love, not by scaring them that Hell is their place to go if they don't listen.

It's not effective

We hate the sin, not the person.

Hello

I am actually used to heat

Well here in the Western Pacific, temperatures get as high as 43 (C)

43 is still lucky, we reach 45-48 sometimes

And yes, 20-29 is cold to ours

I knew this Brit that said 23 is melting heat there like wut
that's our ac temperature always

I'm used to it anyway

We have an electric fan at least

You too, cheers.

Depends on the flu vaccine.

Some still have thimerosal, some have not.

It's actually hard to generalize since there's many companies that create flu vaccines.

Depends on your country also.

Here we can't even agree on whose vaccines to use

For Covid, we're using Pfizer, Sinovac, that Russian one, and Astrazeneca.

Basically a mix of four countries.

Sure it won't kill us, but it will kill the next generations after us.

How did we get from my statement of saying Global Warming won't surely affect us but will affect the next far generations to a vaccine?

It takes time.

Perhaps two or so centuries that's where we can experience the full effect, as of now, there's none.

I mean, no one can really predict the future.

I am very sure Democrats ain't controlling other countries, mostly our country, and we still report on Global Warming AND Climate Change.

After all, Science is now politicized.

Globalists...arent they the people that like corporations to succeed to gain profit?

If so, aren't corporations (particularly mining and forestry) the ones that are being affected by the environmentalists calls to stop their activities 'to save the earth from global warming and climate change'?

If, all those above are true,
then why would they push for something that would destroy their own companies and profits for nothing?

Yes, it's hypocrital to force everyone to have a vaccination while the government promotes freedom of choice.

I can agree with the farmers, what I'm currently targetting are the huge corporations. Farmers supply food to the rest of the world. If they're contributing to Climate Change then they should be dealt with last.

Please specify

Iirc they're teaching different subjects as a way to improve skills of students on different aspects, such as problem-solving, logical solving, etc.

Just like how History teaches us to be skeptical, research, and verify sources (which is sadly not being followed anymore in many schools I have seen).

Depends on the person.

Some are more interested in Maths, some are more interested in Social Sciences and Humanities.

After all, what attacks our beliefs are called lies. Have seen a lot of it, ranging from the Left to the Center and to the Right.

If anyone here hears the word "History"
What comes into your mind?

Is it memorization to you?

I mean, how do you learn history, by memorization?

I'll debunk the memorization thing, I'll just finish my classes real quick.

Here it is.

History is not in anyway a memorization subject. Although memorization is part, History mainly focuses on critical thinking, research, etc.

Not all Historians are good at memorization, that's what I want to say. They are meant to create and form an argument based on documents and witnesses (which are most likely biased). If these arguments are accepted, they then get in what is taught to schools.

That's where they are doing wrong imo.

In fact I also started on History by memorization.

I got more interested when I learned how it works. That's where I knew I should take it as a course.

I know, how it works is also interesting ngl.

The fun (and difficult) part is where you separate and know what the bias is and what is truth.

Yes.

History is fun for other people.

Some like Maths, some like Social Sciences.

It applies to everyone. Even the evilest of the evil did at least one good thing.

He made Germany strong economically and Militarily after they were humiliated.

But he used that as an advantage to destroy other people's lives. That was the cost.

Austria gave Serbia harsh terms that caused the war. No one in both sides did their best (obviously) to de-escalate the tension.

Also war was inevitable then.

Increasing power and conflict, alliances forming. Everything was set for a war, it was only one spark that was needed to make the barrel explode.

Yes. It was not Serbia *alone* that started it.
It was the inevitable spark.

Europe was a powder keg, and it was the Balkans that were the fuse.

That fuse was lit during the Assassination, then War began.

Sarcasm?

iirc it was more expensive to fake a moon landing than to land a real man on the moon.

If it was indeed fake, the Soviets (who had obviously a lot of budget for the KGB and their Space Industry) would have not stopped talking about it, we would be hearing also from these Soviets that Apollo 11 was not real.

The Soviets would have taken advantage of it, which they did not.

Also there is a straight line above the flag to make it look like it's upward.

That's a very different image to what I am referring to.

It is very obvious that the image is fake, simply check the suit.

If it was official then it would have been widely used too.

Then may I see the articles, books, or anything where this is used?

I have never seen that image (you sent) until now.

Yes, 1969.
BUT, the Suit is very different than the most widely used, it is very clear that the astronaut is in a training only.

There's many things not included there. Apollo 11 Suits had much more things attached to them.

I am aware of this.

I'll listen to this lol