Milorad
Discord ID: 721511664364552222
570 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/6
| Next
It's gonna blow up
Buy when it dips to 330 if it dips to that point ever again
Which I doubt once we get on the train to 600
fascism = nazism but unironically
<:soyjak:797260561909153802>
He looks like the average German, alien with a weird elongated head
Damn Hitler and Heydrich were Dinaric Serbs.....
Not true
Lil Pump > Wiz Khalifa
Cioran sucks balls, it's just a Romanian describing how shitty life in Romania is and how there's no meaning in stealing copper wire anymore
@Erlik แฏ I'm in school rn
No
Goths are Serbs
^^^
We're illiterate because we're unconstrained by language, we're not slaves to signs and the corporeal pleasures
Read on Nietzsches critique of the Germans
"The Germans are like women, you can scarcely ever fathom their depths - they haven't any" t. Nietzsche
"My ancestors were Polish [Serb] nobility: I inherited from them my instincts, including perhaps also the liberum vero"
t. Nietzsche
"The Germans have no conception of greatness" t. Nietzsche
"I thank heaven that in all my instincts I am a Pole [Serb] and nobody else" t. Nietzsche
Curious how the only good German philosophers were either Sorbs, Silesians or Poles
German inferiority rectified
Derrida is great
None
They're all terrible
Dugin is good tho
Yes
Marxism is terrible
Dead end ideology
China
Carl Schmitt lecture #3862296
It's Hegelian language retard
Not to simp for Germany but I'm pretty sure Britain was relegated to their Island for almost the entirety of the war
It didn't
The Soviet planned economy was stagnant, if Gorby didn't pull out the reforms a US invasion of the USSR would be inevitable
Gorbachev should've gone the Deng route and embraced a market economy without embracing political liberalism
Then why are you a Marxist retard
Marxism is a dead end ideology, its shitty liberal universalism and pseudo scientific misinterpretation of Hegel
He didn't
The Chinese system today is entirely inspired by native Chinese philosophy and culture, ie Taoism and Legalism that's why they worship Schmitt so much
Really Marxism just serves as moral linguistic resacralization of their authority
He didn't
Marxism is just a stand in religion for China, its only a matter of time before they abandon it for some cultural rejuvenation movement
They kinda are already doing that with their civilizational identity they're creating
Trust me I've read all the Nick Land literature on China, I'm an expert <:troll:795676641450917888>
<:crying:795686294696230943>
Dugin is great philosophically
If you can't understand him I'd suggest reading Evola first or something
He didn't shit on Hegel he borrowed Hegels language and misinterpreted it
No most of the young Hegelians were smart unlike Marx <:troll:795676641450917888>
Bauer and Stirner were based, I doubt anything Marx wrote can stand up to either
>Marx
>dunking on anyone
It's irrelevant in of itself, not because of another irrelevant writer like Marx
Why are you trying to project anger on me
ok?
๐
Whore of Bablyon
What would the topic be tho
Debate why Marxism is ontologically liberal <:troll:795676641450917888>
I don't have a mic I use the same earbuds on both, I'm just getting on my PC so I can Google shit
Dialectical materialism being liberal because its a linear view of history
And universalist
This
Western Christianity at least
No
They're absolutist
Completely different
Trust me bro
I've read Evola
t. Likes Dugin
They're derived from his philosophy
I bet Gumiliyev was a perennialist too
>funny Russian name
I doubt
Ik based Dugin
You people are too bluepilled
Giuli Schmitt cult
Evola > Guenon
Muslims are cringe aristotelians (liberals), Sufis are the only good Muslims
And the Khawarij
Neoplatonism gang
Khawarij Sufis
I wouldn't really call salafis khawarij
At least not theologically
Ik
Ibadis are the last khawarij today
At least in theory they are โน๏ธ
woah
racist
4/4=0 @Pacem
@Deleted User so these are my points
a) marxism has a linear view of history ie dialectical materialism where in class is the driving force of history and from there b) its a metaphysical universal that is presupposed to be true from which further conclusions are drawn and finally c) since by that I cant even conclude that marxism is liberal since thats how most ideologies functions, my third point is that they draw the same conclusion where the individual is emancipated from society as opposed to him proceeding from society as it is in traditional ideologies or systems before the enlightenment
@Erlik แฏ unmute me
570 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/6
| Next