ok facts

😔

Small chunguses are for feeding big chunguses

In this world its chungus or be chungussed

Does it matter?

It seems like you are one to get chungussed...

Nobody out chungusses the chungus

You cant

Fact

If you have no evidence of god, you assume non existence.

Absence of evidence is evidence of absence

No it isnt

The burden of proof is on the party claiming god does exist to prove it

No? It's a basic logical concept

Yes it is

Oh you are fucking kidding me

My message gets deleted

Ok imma retype it

The burden of proof can only be on the active or passive side. The active side is the one that has a belief, or is performing an action. The passive side is the one that does not have a belief, or is not performing an action.

There are an infinite number of things you are not doing, and an infinite number of things you don't believe in. It is logically impossible to prove/justify them all, therefore the burden of proof CANNOT be on the passive side. Since this is a true dichotomy, the burden of proof must be on the active side.

Claiming that something *doesn't* exist is a negative claim, which means that its the passive stance. Claiming that something *does* exist is a positive claim, which means that is the active stance.

i added something

"Claiming that something doesn't exist is a negative claim, which means that its the passive stance. Claiming that something does exist is a positive claim, which means that is the active stance."

But anyways, lets assume that i do have to prove that god doesn't exist for some reason, i will

Is your god omnipotent

Do you believe in a god?

Well if you do believe in a god that is indeed omnipotent

That god cannot exist since omnipotence itself is logically impossible

I didn't say you have to

i said *if*

No I'm not

Then my argument doesn't apply to your god

I should have specified that it disproves the idea of a christian god

Since the christian god is omnipotent, and omnipotence is logically impossible

If god does exist above logic, then there would be no way to prove his existence logically, so any argument for his existence would require empirical evidence

If you make a positive claim you have to back it up with some sort of proof or justification

How can you say something exists without any proof or justification for it?

-roll 69

Damn

I will roll a 1 watch

-roll 1

I was right

57

57

If I was white I would be 13

-roll 100

Damn

If I get a 69 I get admin

-roll 100

SHIT

Stupid ass dice

13

-roll 100

Damn

41

-roll 100

Damm

13

-roll 50

HAH

17

-roll 50

Shit

1 to 540 for me getting admin

169

-roll 540

69

-roll 100

-8ball am I gay

-8ball am I epic

Yep I win

I guessed 13

Ok

-roll 50

You lose

See you

-8ball is @mofth a female

Yep what I thought

Anarchist gamer girl? Too good to be true

Why tf do I get a notification when someone pings mods

chungus

my chungus is overweight

i fed it too many baby chungusses

what do you mean "hmm"

do you think im an alt or something pal

butt cheeks

baby chungus

khaine alt

khaine alt

bro

im ninja nipple ???

yo give me moderator role

i will b a great moderator i have modded 5 servers

and i would love to mod one with over 150 members

please bro i grind this server every day for the past 3 years a

and i just love this server so much bro

@personbelowmetriplegay they dont get the funny

sad

ok

how much secks

3 secks? 4 secks?

7 secks? deal

Government? cringe