Messages from @Virtue (Discord ID: 252607273942253578)
395 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/2 | Next
have you heard about white sharia?
the stupidiest funniest shit ever.
I want to give you the best link ever
I want to give you the best first impression
I makes me angry and makes me laugh at the same time..
I so fucking hope this is in't a real white nationalist opinion...
they have awfully detailed arguments for it
its like they really though about this alot
I am so fucking sure I seen his face on some fakery before
an approproation of white culture- WHAT THE FUCK
it raise a point with the word "fascism".
The socialists and left only hated and opposed when the second world war started.
There was no ideological rivarly between fascism and communism
other than the rivarly between fascism and between communists.
Stalin was worshipped in the entire world under the cold war
fascism was slander world right after the world war
after the world war socialist accused everyone they didn't like of fascism
because Soviety was an ally
they worshipped Stalin in the west because there was no proof
of Stalins mass murders
the belief after world war was basically that communism won
and that communism was a paradice dictatorship that didn't hurt anyone
and only fascism hurt people.
All dictatorships and all leaders in the entire world from the stone ages
where fascists and nazies.
And all forms of communist leaders are immune to slander.
Yea but my point is that the socialist didn't know what fascism or nazism where.
Everything that wasn't their ideology was fascist or nazi.
The german communists in the 60thies seriously believed
the democratic german republic
was 100% national socialist.
exactly everyone that didn't fit their narrative was fascist or something.
The old communist and socialist despiced weakness
No the victim cult comes from the hippies
and from the usefull idiots.
In the 30thies and even in the 60thies
there where very little interest in mercy or compassion...
Yeah kind of but they did that only because the militant approach failed. if you see what I mean.
If you read about the communist groups and their rethoric
the thing that strikes me is the difference in their values and attitudes to things like human life..
also the socialist movement used to be pretty sexist...
the idea of feminism was seen as capitalist..
also the socialists where not spoiled children then
originally the socialists where psychopathic workerclass brutes
yeah but in the 30thies, workerclass movements hated the idea of women stealing their jobs..
they also hated the idea of rich women telling poor men what to do
-by hirering poor people for labout..
I dont think they understud the difference..
True.. but I dont think they saw it like that..
well back in those days -- women actually stole some factory jobs
actually lots of factories had alot and alot of women..
when the first machines where installed
Anyway. lots of women also used to own their pubs and resturants.
back in the old day where alcohol was free for all.
And they where private teachers and doctors..
Women where kind of equal back then..
feminism and socialism just fucked it up
Women dominated the private school sector and the private hospital sector..
when social welfare started.. they went unemployed..
Well there are laws now who can sell alchohol and stuff
and liquir stores and resturants are regulated by various health agencies
that favored MEN
my point was that women owned all the pubs and resturants
when there was no regulation..
alot of things probably.. should be provided by the state
but the socialist most certainly got it all wrong.
culture preserve subsidiare
I think the wirees and telephone and internet
cables should be public
and the companies can run the actual services..
also I think you should have good
state schools only for the most gifted and smartest
and if they fail they have to go to private school
also the central bank should be state owned..
I dont want schools that are meant to equalize things..
I estimate that more than 30 percent of the population
are so genetically stupid they will auto fail any education..
just give education to the elite.. and only if they get good grades..
and treaten the parents with expulsion so they are dependentent
I want conservative formal authoritarian disciplinarian schools
you know about confusian education system?
success in state school should mean that you get elevated social rank
that you become nobility and eligable for work in the goverment
and in the beurocracy
every who fails state education are
the servants and lower social classes..
the voice less
the elite shall be the thinkers, artists,lawmen and
all loyal to the party
If you dont get this state education
then you still have rights and you are still protected by the law
the thing is that this system is very good at adjusting
the elites questions and address the social problems all the time
consider our own democratic system
which is so obsesses with asking normal people what they think
to get their votes
that that the entire system is drowning in nonsensical opinions
and every fucking idiot is encouraged to believe
they just as insighfull as some professor.
in the Chinese beurocracy there where no theological restrictions.
The chinese beuroctats questioned and debated openly
every aspect of religion and tradition.
the one shared ideology is just a front for the political system..
in our current political system nothing less than a fanatical ideology
can push through the simplest reform..
More specific. The shared ideology is the education system
people will not submit to authoritive teacher-student relationships
in a democracy.
I read about teaching methods and the history of changes in teachers methods
and think the old disciplin oriented education sytem was the correct
one and this education we have now is based
on free upbringing and having discussions with children
to get them to understand things..
...sight I meant authoritarian as authoritian
not the political system..
Human beings have and need authority figures..
I am not saying that we should brainwash children or make everyone
That is a bit of modern propaganda you have been feed.
students and other teachers did question teatchers
in the entire victorian era.
But they did so within their system.
they still had authority figures..
the current school system has abolish the authorative figure
But you dont actually need to get rid of the authority figure
Teachers can be authority figures without resorting to violence
I actually come from a savage private school.
When I got into a modern school
I was so fucking gratefull
and I hated my spoiled fucking peers
because they didn't appriciate it
My first reaction was actually that I wanted the teachers to be more authoritarian
to the other students who misbehaved
the problem with FREE schools.
is that the kids who are assholes
are not punnished.
the problem with asshole school
is that everyone are punnished collectively all the time
I consider myself very libertarian as well.
but I think society needs to be mix of the power we give to authorities
and the freedrom we demand for ourselves.
I think collective punishment just damage the group morale
its not like soldiers get many luxeries to begin with..
also collective punishment
assumes that you dont know who is guilty..
you could speculate that just being in the army
and volunteering for a fucking war
is a sacrifice equivalent to collective punnishment already
if you survive and when you get back home...
leader= authority = IS NOT THE SAME AS DICTATORSHIP
Basically I a mutualist and a liberal conservative.
Society can be one efficient unit
and people can still be free within it.
look individual freedrom
happens on a smaller scale
than the collective scale
from a larger perspective individuals
are the building block that society is based on
Mutualism is a philosophy that among other things decree
that people work as a collective only when neccessary
and spend most of their time as free individuals.
for example if you go to work
then at work you give up your individuality
but after work you regain your individuality.
Also if there is a war , everyone give up their individualism for survival
by being conscripted
and then at peace they regain their individuality.
I honestly think that goverment officials
are capable of running parks to everyones betterment
without being tyrants
I think public space should be controlled by the goverment
because otherwise gangs will just show up
and people will throw trash everywhere
if we have a good task for the goverment to handle
and we know what the purpose is
we shouldn't be so paranoid
I think there are good and bad security services..
guards tend to become more soft and mild
when crime goes down..
you can see that in countries that have low crime rates
than police and security staff become more gentle
I think only home owners and members of sport clubs
should be allowed to have guns
I think you have the right to shoot anyone to break into
your house or try to steal your cattle or your car
IF THAT CAR IS PARKED ON YOUR YARD.
well I am all for militan patroits loving guns
but I dont think guns should be sold outside
of regulated guns or sport clubs
well with my knowledge of politics I am pretty sure I could exterminate american criminality
long story short ... nothing like this can happen in my system..
would be demolish or close down every single public space
where vandals gathers
so Kaarma basically say he had the right to kill those people
because they where breaking into his home?
what was his relationship with the student?
I fucking hate if anyone tried to steal my motherfucking beer.
Property right is more important than the offenders life.
I would gather all the kids in the gang and their parents
and shame their parents to death.
Do you see DEAD PERSON??
THAT COULD BE YOUR KID!
YOU SHOULD BE THANKFULL
then I put all the kids on 2 years disciplinary school
Kaarma COULD HAVE BEEN IN DANGER.. how the fuck would he know?
generally speaking, I think the rule is as follows
if you dont break the rules you are free
and if you break the rules you have forfit
the contract to the state that grants you that freedrom.
because otherwise people will just use their freedrom
to shit and urinate in public
or even in their nighbours postbox..I seen that happen.
The but problem is not the mere existence of rules..
like some liberals think.
We built public toilets for people like you
and the vandals still prefere mailboxes
If I urinate in public I will at least use the forest or a harbour..
Anyone should avoid this no matter the cost..
A small fee or a stern look would be more than today..
I think I got a point with the public toilets.
If we build public toilets EVERYWHERE
and people dont use them..
then there is only one thing left that can be the cause..
lack of discipline...
Also even if you fucking pay for free public school to everyone..
most kids WILL NOT STUDY
and if you give free money to unemployed services
THEY WILL NOT SHOW UP
a large percent of poverty
is caused by lazy motherfuckers who
dont want to job
then rest are hard working poor
who serve to give the parasites a good face.
I think you need to give people in the bottom of society some guidelines
or some restrictions.
untill they prove they can take care of themselves.
okej you asked before why I suggested so many things should be goverment owned or regulated
but none of them would be social welfare... this is why.
also I want the old food banks we used to have BACK
I live in Sweden so I only know how it is here.
that the food that was not sold or consumed was sold or given
to a food bank.
and the poor could get food copongs.
but then the poor wanted cash instead..
which proves that poor can be assholes
and it defeats the entire purpose
because giving poor people cash
means the food only goes to waste
and .. yeah
if you just set a limit right there.. that would have been a reasonable discplay of authority..
you cannot let people in the bottom of society who has no stakes in it
vote and control the conditions
on how the state is helping them..
But the poor and the slaves cannot know for themselves
how to get out their situation, because they dont understand how the food and money was wasted.
Only a person who is NOT a slave can help them.
No at least 30 percent of the poor are just lazy
giving them food and shelter was already on the list I gave you
Yes that is basically what I already was going to do.
when I said lazy, I meant all psychological factors
I agree that if you give the poor a purpose or direction
they will walk to a better future !
but left on their own they will not.
cut his nails
and keep him in his collar always!
you dont want him to go anywhere
HE is much bigger than you?
OMG take no chances, CAGE RIGHT NOW!
the demon satyr fucking was HOT
more of that and less of the other stuff
seriously nationalism is not really tied to religion..
hundred years ago nationalists had nothing to do with christianity
and I think people just got confused after the world war
nationalism is more tied to paganism
at least in a historical context.
to be honest I dont see how how people
combine the cult of ethnicity
with the religious cult of some international religion
something made me laugh
I never been this happy before..
...but all Spannish girls are whores right?
At least that was my impression when I was in
Jesus. "The study found that people in households with working toilets continue to defecate in the open, and that toilets provided by the state are especially unlikely to be used."
are blacks genetically more likely to shit on the streets?
It wouldn't suprice me if they where!
if the blacks are somalians I am sure its genetic..
Generally speaking I think its white culture
and yes we need to preserve white culture
but some of these countries are so used to
shitting in public that they where well
could have breed it into their genes..
395 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/2 | Next