are you that old?

we need some of that BACK

The physical punnishment is wrong.

But you dont actually need to get rid of the authority figure

Teachers can be authority figures without resorting to violence

I actually come from a savage private school.

When I got into a modern school
I was so fucking gratefull

and I hated my spoiled fucking peers
because they didn't appriciate it

My first reaction was actually that I wanted the teachers to be more authoritarian
to the other students who misbehaved

the problem with FREE schools.
is that the kids who are assholes
are not punnished.

the problem with asshole school
is that everyone are punnished collectively all the time

LOL

I consider myself very libertarian as well.

but I think society needs to be mix of the power we give to authorities
and the freedrom we demand for ourselves.

I dont think so.

I think collective punishment just damage the group morale

its not like soldiers get many luxeries to begin with..

also collective punishment
assumes that you dont know who is guilty..

you could speculate that just being in the army
and volunteering for a fucking war
is a sacrifice equivalent to collective punnishment already

if you survive and when you get back home...

hello

I am not athoritarianist!

its a stupid system..

leader= authority = IS NOT THE SAME AS DICTATORSHIP

have you heard about unity in diversity..

Basically I a mutualist and a liberal conservative.

Society can be one efficient unit
and people can still be free within it.

look individual freedrom
happens on a smaller scale
than the collective scale

from a larger perspective individuals
are the building block that society is based on

Mutualism is a philosophy that among other things decree
that people work as a collective only when neccessary
and spend most of their time as free individuals.

for example if you go to work
then at work you give up your individuality
but after work you regain your individuality.

Also if there is a war , everyone give up their individualism for survival
by being conscripted
and then at peace they regain their individuality.

I honestly think that goverment officials
are capable of running parks to everyones betterment
without being tyrants

I think public space should be controlled by the goverment
because otherwise gangs will just show up
and people will throw trash everywhere
and vandalize

if we have a good task for the goverment to handle
and we know what the purpose is
we shouldn't be so paranoid

I dont think so

I think there are good and bad security services..

guards tend to become more soft and mild
when crime goes down..

you can see that in countries that have low crime rates
than police and security staff become more gentle

I think only home owners and members of sport clubs
should be allowed to have guns

I think you have the right to shoot anyone to break into
your house or try to steal your cattle or your car
IF THAT CAR IS PARKED ON YOUR YARD.

well I am all for militan patroits loving guns
but I dont think guns should be sold outside
of regulated guns or sport clubs

well with my knowledge of politics I am pretty sure I could exterminate american criminality

long story short ... nothing like this can happen in my system..

vandalism..

I dont know anything about this case...

basically the first thing I would do

would be demolish or close down every single public space
where vandals gathers

its actually very cost effective and easy

so Kaarma basically say he had the right to kill those people
because they where breaking into his home?

what was his relationship with the student?

What the fuck did the student do there ?

Kill the student..

then Kaarna is RIGHT

I fucking hate if anyone tried to steal my motherfucking beer.

No seriously..

shoot the vandals

seriously...

Property right is more important than the offenders life.

Then you should arrest all the other kids

I would gather all the kids in the gang and their parents
and shame their parents to death.
Do you see DEAD PERSON??
THAT COULD BE YOUR KID!
YOU SHOULD BE THANKFULL

then I put all the kids on 2 years disciplinary school

Kaarma COULD HAVE BEEN IN DANGER.. how the fuck would he know?

Hey Dingo!

pleased to meet you, new person!

generally speaking, I think the rule is as follows

if you dont break the rules you are free
and if you break the rules you have forfit
the contract to the state that grants you that freedrom.

because otherwise people will just use their freedrom
to shit and urinate in public
or even in their nighbours postbox..I seen that happen.

You are right on track!

Yes, the rules should not be unjust..

The but problem is not the mere existence of rules..
like some liberals think.

bad you..

We built public toilets for people like you
and the vandals still prefere mailboxes

If I urinate in public I will at least use the forest or a harbour..

Anyone should avoid this no matter the cost..

dock!

A small fee or a stern look would be more than today..

I think I got a point with the public toilets.

If we build public toilets EVERYWHERE
and people dont use them..
then there is only one thing left that can be the cause..
lack of discipline...

Also even if you fucking pay for free public school to everyone..
most kids WILL NOT STUDY

and if you give free money to unemployed services
THEY WILL NOT SHOW UP

the evidence is everywhere

a large percent of poverty
is caused by lazy motherfuckers who
dont want to job

then rest are hard working poor
who serve to give the parasites a good face.

I think you need to give people in the bottom of society some guidelines
or some restrictions.
untill they prove they can take care of themselves.

okej you asked before why I suggested so many things should be goverment owned or regulated
but none of them would be social welfare... this is why.

also I want the old food banks we used to have BACK

I live in Sweden so I only know how it is here.

No what we used to do in Sweden was

that the food that was not sold or consumed was sold or given
to a food bank.
and the poor could get food copongs.

but then the poor wanted cash instead..
which proves that poor can be assholes
and it defeats the entire purpose

because giving poor people cash
means the food only goes to waste
and .. yeah

Now they just get more goverment aids..

aid I mean..

if you just set a limit right there.. that would have been a reasonable discplay of authority..

you cannot let people in the bottom of society who has no stakes in it
vote and control the conditions
on how the state is helping them..

I dont think felongs should have rights..

@Pretorius
But the poor and the slaves cannot know for themselves
how to get out their situation, because they dont understand how the food and money was wasted.
Only a person who is NOT a slave can help them.

No at least 30 percent of the poor are just lazy

I agree.