Messages from @Basileus Sarkly (Discord ID: 264242521444581377)
192 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
We've got to physically remove Communists, so to speak.
Some moron posted the link on /pol/ my dudes.
Speech went downhill after he stopped talking about Byzantium
But I don't want to be a small, rootless, international clique
4 billion is a ludicrously large number, though.
The strain they put on our economy and societies will be impossible to sustain.
In the end, they will attack us for what little there is left.
Can you not forsee an unprecedented human tide sweeping out of Africa when that happens?
Or until even the money you give isn't enough because there just isn't any food left.
What they usually do since 2012 is hop on a boat to Europe
100 years of solid policy will have to hold them back.
The worst of them join Antifa, which is actually good for us.
literally the best thing (for us) they could possibly do is exactly what they're doing
They'll hate college as soon as they get the debt bill
For this generation, pure and unadulterated Capitalism is (perhaps sadly) no longer a possibility.
It's the polar opposite of Marxism and just as appealing to the disenfranchised lowclassman
All that it takes is for international headlines to go to shit.
Civil war in SA and France will tip us over the edge.
A nation is nothing without a genetic profile.
Reform will come too late. War will already have set in by the time reform would be theoretically possible.
Frankly, war is the only thing that would make reform palatable to the masses.
Even the hispanics who are citizens today will REPLACE whites in the US by higher birthrates alone.
We have to repatriate current citizens to their ethnic homelands. That is politically impossible.
Don't you understand?
None of it will matter when whites are a minority.
>"""minorities""" + liberals => death of Constitution
>we've been ignoring it for centuries
>look where that's gotten us
How do you propose we re-instate respect for the Constitution?
Do you think you can convince people to care about it?
It's a slaveholding white landholder's document.
So you've already come around to our way of thinking.
Do you have any conception of what is politically possible?
Deporting citizens who dislike the Constitution is not possible.
Paris is in a state of anarchy every few months
Three billion migrants are on the way by the end of the century
Why do you think public opinion matters when at most 5% of the population will be doing the actual fighting?
You're still implying that public opinion matters.
Keep in mind:
-this isn't happening tomorrow
-30 years from now is the soonest conceivable date
-South Africa, France, and perhaps more European countries will already have fallen to civil disorder
-the country will be minority white
-many nonwhites will try to blame whites for their struggles (see every minority-white nonasian country)
-the government and military will be full of radical leftists and nonwhites
-military will split and become ineffective
-civil disorder will grip the nation
-the country fragments along ethnic lines
The percentage doesn't matter. It's not important.
The fact is that civil disorder is going to occur
And the government will be unable and unwilling to stop it.
Trump is not forever.
Even with the wall, he will not be able to reverse the demographic shift.
Every election cycle, things will be harder for us.
Reform will not happen.
Do you think >50% wants the civil war to continue in those places?
People are driven to fight *despite wanting peace*
@Grim - CA It will happen sooner if the debt bubble is as big as some doomsayers think.
No. Disillusionment and social incohesion is what leads to it.
Along with political polarization and radicalization.
These are the ingredients for a civil war. Opinion only matters in a war prosecuted by a nation.
@mememaestro WAITING ON THAT SCREENSHOT YOU THOT
Want to see how I can make you love armed conflict?
*police laugh because you're being attacked by a person of their ethnicity*
If you aren't aware that this is possible, please study history more.
kek he ignored my argument after saying "not an argument"
Anarcho-capitalism in an ethnically homogeneous society is right wing
>throw out fallacies
>says this after arguing semantics
next thing you know he'll be talking about ordering sixty thousand hotdogs
>implying left libertarianism is even a thing
"H-hey don't stop me from being a degenerate! But gibs me dat!"
The really powerful ones are, sadly, capitalists.
Best system is national capitalism.
>strong leadership keeps enemies out of the state
>strong economy means that you won't be easily beaten in wartime
Over the long term, it creates an undeserving aristocracy
Whereas capitalism creates a deserving aristocracy.
hence "National Capitalism" as opposed to "National Socialism"
We don't live in a national capitalist society
Jews are allowed to manipulate through in-group preference.
Such would not be possible, since everybody would be part of the volk.
Probably not compatible with capitalism.
It's the most we can do without cutting in to total production.
More controls, like in NatSoc, would inevitably lead to inefficiencies.
Maybe they're good in the short term, but probably not in the long term.
They adopted free market principles in Chile.
But when your livelihood is threatened by your rivals, you'll try even harder.
And your opponents will provide better goods to consumers.
192 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.