But they still happen.

You're still implying that public opinion matters.

Keep in mind:
-this isn't happening tomorrow
-30 years from now is the soonest conceivable date
-South Africa, France, and perhaps more European countries will already have fallen to civil disorder
-the country will be minority white
-many nonwhites will try to blame whites for their struggles (see every minority-white nonasian country)
-the government and military will be full of radical leftists and nonwhites
-military will split and become ineffective
-civil disorder will grip the nation
-the country fragments along ethnic lines
-war ensues

The percentage doesn't matter. It's not important.

The fact is that civil disorder is going to occur

And the government will be unable and unwilling to stop it.

Trump is not forever.
Even with the wall, he will not be able to reverse the demographic shift.
Every election cycle, things will be harder for us.
Reform will not happen.

>public opinion

Literally why do you keep mentioning this?

Take an opinion poll in Syria or Sudan.

Or Somalia

Do you think >50% wants the civil war to continue in those places?

NOBODY LIKES CIVIL WARS

OPINION DOESN'T MATTER

People are driven to fight *despite wanting peace*

@Grim - CA It will happen sooner if the debt bubble is as big as some doomsayers think.

No. Disillusionment and social incohesion is what leads to it.

Both are growing in the US.

Along with political polarization and radicalization.

These are the ingredients for a civil war. Opinion only matters in a war prosecuted by a nation.

Who said it was already underway?

NOT AN ARGUMENT

wtf

no

>30 years

>already underway

Yes.

Good way of putting it.

@mememaestro WAITING ON THAT SCREENSHOT YOU THOT

Kek I win

Your screenshot proves me right

>underway != on the way

Want to see how I can make you love armed conflict?

*starts shooting at you*

*police laugh because you're being attacked by a person of their ethnicity*

>literally South Africa right now

If you aren't aware that this is possible, please study history more.

I gave you a modern example you retard

It literally was an argument.

kek he ignored my argument after saying "not an argument"

Nice argument

Give proofs @Anony6498

You made the claim, Anony

Anarcho-capitalism in an ethnically homogeneous society is right wing

National capitalism is also right wing

Monarchism + minarchism
THE FUCKING GOAT

Argument from semantics is pretty weak

Can be dismissed

1/10 try again

>throw out fallacies
>says this after arguing semantics

what did he mean by this?

probably cheese pizza too

next thing you know he'll be talking about ordering sixty thousand hotdogs

>implying left libertarianism is even a thing

"H-hey don't stop me from being a degenerate! But gibs me dat!"

BAN CAFFEINE

Dude

STOP TAKING COKE

It'd wipe most of them out desu

The really powerful ones are, sadly, capitalists.

feelsbadman

They're the ultimate pragmatists

Best system is national capitalism.
Objectively.
>strong leadership keeps enemies out of the state
>strong economy means that you won't be easily beaten in wartime

And the volk get to prosper.

It's not socially darwinistic enough

Over the long term, it creates an undeserving aristocracy

Whereas capitalism creates a deserving aristocracy.

Capitalism, my dude.

hence "National Capitalism" as opposed to "National Socialism"

We don't live in a national capitalist society

Jews are allowed to manipulate through in-group preference.

Such would not be possible, since everybody would be part of the volk.

>heavy bureaucracy
Probably not compatible with capitalism.

Which means that it is controllable.

Simple competition does the trick.

whereas with Jews, you always lose.

It's the most we can do without cutting in to total production.

More controls, like in NatSoc, would inevitably lead to inefficiencies.

Maybe they're good in the short term, but probably not in the long term.

They adopted free market principles in Chile.

Stability isn't always desirable.

It diminishes innovation to some degree.

There's always a profit motive.

But when your livelihood is threatened by your rivals, you'll try even harder.

And you'll lose when you deserve to.

And your opponents will provide better goods to consumers.

kek

*Eradicates degeneracy internally*

nani

great plan

you first

<:GWragTbhfam:390321741525942272>

unlike ayatollah varg

lies

jewish lies

farrah i don't feel like this is innocent anymore

guys i think my dog has down syndrom lol