!agree

I'm not well versed on Thatcherite Politics but what I do know is that she was radical when it came anti-socialist policies and general political alignment. I also know that she was much more conservative and heavy handed in her use of government but was overall effective in her economic reforms and anti-socialist ethos. So my question is, Should UKIP/ the Liberalists try to brand themselves along the lines of Neo-Thatcherism?

How come?

Hmm... is she disliked by the youth?

they could try deifying her in the realm of Churchill, Reagan, and the like. It could garner support if framed as an anti-socialist crusade

very true, I don't think I would be either but a strong counter weight to an authoritarian economy is always useful

It could force a meeting in the middle

besides her as a figure were her policies generally liked (besides the poll tax)

In general though, is she seen as a good figure or bad? I'm American so I have no clue about this stuff

From what I can tell she was a more effective version of Reagan but ended up less liked than him

But I also think the circumstance of the UK was much worse so a stronger hand was needed which is why I like her but don't like Reagan

Sadly, that's not very surprising when it comes to American Presidents

Interestingly I think that's a big reason for why we haven't made Puerto Rico a state, with debt being a major issue we don't want to deal with a nation that had massive debt already and also needs major upgrading and updating. Too big a cost for not much in return

Helicopter economy is best economy

oof