NippleKing
Discord ID: 205730767853060096
440 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/5
| Next
Hey I'm gonna do some timcast r34, any ideas?
๐
"Generally accepted internet rule that states that pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject. Additionally it is accepted that the rule itself has limitations and you cannot be too specific on the content of the item in question."
63 is genderswap
They're more like guidelines
Like a little pamphlet with things to do in Japan and what customs are best to be kept in mind
More of a film and cartoon kind of guy
Got a loose sketch so far
I'm fixing the face of stoned tim pool
I can see it looks like down syndrome
I can do superficially politically related things if that's less upsetting
Diversity of opinion and ideas seems fairly positive
But diversity in appearance seems a bit pointless
It's superficial diversity. Easier to accomplish, and doesn't necessarily stimulate critical analysis
It fits in perfectly with the postmodern train of thought
Which borders nihilism, if you ask me
I feel that the progressive/authoritarian left's ideology exists in a quantum superstate
It's "probability" not an idea
The problem is using old terminology, like Nazi and communism
They have so much associations that aren't necessarily factual, but emotional
They're directly shaped by their times
Neo-nazi is also a dumb term, unless it's used before the 80s
What about the name **Probabilitarian** to describe the alt right (before it became synonymous with neo-nazi to the MSM and general public.)
It's an inherently positive sounding word, right?
Yeah, so **Probabilitarian** could make a good moniker
maybe
It's from a survey of the most positive words, in sound and meaning
2016-ish
the memey movement that was before known as alt right
Oh shit
I meant Possibilitarian
ere is the actual philosophy in Mr. Peale's own words: โI challenge you to become a possibilitarian. No matter how dark things seem to be or actually are, raise your sights and see the possibilities โ always see them, for they are always there.โ The root meaning of the word possible is โcapable of making happenโ
The difference in meaning to progressives is that it is grounded moreso in being capable of making happen
Not "trying with insufficient knowledge and assumptions"
Yeah, it does seem more like a rule of thumb. I guess I just liked the word
It's an escalation of liberalism, like communism is to socialism
Makes sense that they're the other end of conservatism
Degenerates?
That'd be the opposite, right?
I'd say liberalism is a generally positive demeanor to altering existing social constructs and laws to allow more people to feel more freedom in the way they live their life
Through democracy?
Let's get some extreme polar opposites, for some ground
Being steadfast in retaining and preserving the social and political structure as it is
Regardless of any possible improvements that may be introduced
OR
Being breaking down any boundaries that are, regardless of their protection or importance and stability they may provide
Everything is relevant and therefore everyone has equal power
Those are the two polar opposites, right?
So where is the common ground in these two
Assuming horse shoe theory
Wanting to exist and retain existence
It's the strong, supportive patriarchal figure and the protective, quixotic matriarchal figure
You need both to be in some sort of balance
If you'd imagine the conservative and progressive as a male and female character trying to sustain their relationship/household but also their own dreams
Same as conservative
It's relevant to the structure of society
Fundamentalists are like what came before that
Going back to the absolute bedrock of the society
That's why I usually avoid the established terms
Because of their connotations, which aren't always descriptive of the original meaning
It also makes for much nicer conversation
Conservatism is a stranding word
Fundamentalist would be the standing word
There's also a different meaning here in Europe
left/right
From what I've heard other American pallerinos
The two party system was a dumb idea to reinforce, mang
Right - more control to private sector
Left - more control to governments
Yeah
That's the horseshoe theory
They end up in the same place
You need a constant flux
You can't stay in the middle
Well, yeah
Their extremes
It's all nepotism
Because of our lame social nature
There's a difference, though
One comes from the production of goods/services
The other comes from the escalation of power of those manufacturers
It's all cyclical, because products and ideas go obsolete
Yeah, good point. It's a superficial issue at best
Just avoid using the established and dusty/stagnant political monikers and explain your fundamental issues like you would to a four year old
Minus the somewhat denigrating tone of voice
People don't seem to appreciate that
Remember Trump's run in the 2000s?
He withdrew from the race
Because of infighting of his party "The Reform Party"
He expressed his concerns by referring to David Duke, Pat Buchanan, and Lenora Fulani as a Klansman, a Neo-Nazi, and a Communist, respectively.
"Drrumff **never** even disavowed David Duke! What a racist."
The human rights commission?
I'm a europoor, please be patient
OH, right
It's alright, though.
Hillary puts hot sauce on **everything**
And always carries some in her handbag.
I've had some really based burgers in Japan
MINIMALISM
440 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/5
| Next