this

So since nothing is happening. I have a question. How does solar and lunar eclipse work on flat Earth?

Anyone else actually willing to entertain the idea of answering. I mean if the model is based on reality. Then it shouldn't be hard.
Edit: If so. Just @ me.

I suspect there wont be an answer.

A) Satan
B) Money
C) Money and Satan... Motan? Saney?

The greek started it

What did he say???

What the bot reacted just now? Ahh whatever.

Now we burried my question.

I thought thats lounge

Still wanna know what causes solar and lunar eclipses on flat earth.

The moon obsures our view of sun. Creating a solar eclipse. Usualy viable from few places. Would post a picture, but cant because role.

To touch on lunar. That happends when earth is between sun and moon. Preventing light of the sun from reaching the moon.

If you are trying to say that moon causes solar eclipse. Shouldn't we see top of the moon from distance? And what causes lunar eclipse then.

Well we know its the moon. Cuz we can see its sides as it approaches earth. If it were something else. We would see it coming.
The reason you can see moon during the new moon phase is because he's on other side of the planet. He's on the day side. Lunar eclipse happens in place of full moon btw.
As for why moon move in opposite direction. Its because earth spins faster than it orbits.

The reason moon is so hard to see its because sun is too bring. And if you want to stare into it during eclipse to confirm its the moon. I dont sugest you do that. But its the same reason we dont see stars in middle of the day.

sure

You do not see the moon because its shadow. When it moves on to the side. The reflection you should be seeing isnt to bring and the sun overshines it, which is the same reason you dont see stars during full day and the reason you dont see moon shadow while it aproaches the sun for eclipse.

Well what it is? A non descript shadow object that only apears for eclipse and at the same time causes moon to disapear? While the moon should be between Earth and sun.

Moon doesnt cast shadow smaller than itself tho.

Moon is just 3500 kilometers in diameter.

Yes however the sun is also much bigger than the moon. And dont big light sources cause objects to cast smaller shadows?

If lightsource is larger than the object casting it. It will cast smaller shadow.

You will also get this half shadow.

The half shadows actualy come out bigger. But the deep shadow does not.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/427578074758905856/662333204816199692/unknown.png

This full shadow can be casted if the object is close enough. As distance increases deep shadow will be smaller and smaller. Until only half shadow will be left.

What we care about here is the umbra part of the shadow. Thats what allows us to observe full eclipse from earth. https://discordapp.com/channels/@me/427578074758905856/662334504643592222

While those in penumbra part of the shadow on earth. Will observe only partial eclipse.
And if you were to observe this eclipse from even larger distance. You would only see a dark spot pass over the sun without it casting any noticeable shadow.

meaby if i were allowed to actualy post them

no lemme look them up again

nonono i have to back up my claims

How else would you belive me

I mean its not like i didnt study optics and therefore have knowledge of how it works.

https://td-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/td-u-shadow-effects-shadow-objects-2-1024x646.png

This should load

https://i.stack.imgur.com/deX76.jpg

and the second

So you arent even willing to take a look.

And that gives you extra knowledge?

Why dont you prove it wrong them. Cuz saying "thats not how it works" isnt proving it. Thats making a claim. And you need to back up your claims.

So surely if you are doing this for so long it shouldnt be a problem for you.

Are you sure you are looking at the right picture.

The issue is that it isnt

Moon doesnt have to belive that.

It doesnt change reality.

Youve heard of perspective right? Big objects can apear small if they are far away and small can apear large if they are close.

You can do this with coins ffs

As for the flashlight and the coin. The light source isnt big enough for that. AS you said. sun is larger by more than 400 times compared to moon

I am yet to change the model. Its not my fault you cannot compremend the sizes in question.

Can you?

Opps

Do as you want. Ban me. IT doesnt change anything.

What moon thinks is irrelevant.

I can think im bigger than an elephant but that doesnt make me bigger.

The elephant is still larger.

Yet i can apear to be same size or even bigger if i stand close enough to the observer and the elephant stands far away.

What im saying is that you cannot deny they can be different sizes.

See my elephant analogy.

So what do you want. A photo of the sun and moon right next to it?

Nono tell me what kind of photo you want.

Why cant you provide a photo that would prove me wrong.

I mean if its the reality and the sun isnt that far away and that big why is it so difficult.

Now can we plase stop moving the goalposts.

If they were the same size you wouldnt see the korona.

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1205/aseJan2010_svalgaard800c.jpg
This is the photo of may 2012 eclipse.

As you can see one of the circles is smaller than the other.

Exept you cannot see light that doesnt reflect into your eyes. thats why you cant see laser beams of pointers.

Unless they are going though a medium that would reflect them, like smoke.

Because during the eclipse moon is nowhere around the earth to be found.

Moon infact is a solid object.

What. Can moon be on two places at once?

So you want a photo of the moon now?

So you want the photo of solar eclipse where im illuminating the moon so that you can see it.

Well how do you want me to prove that moon cant be at two places at once.

What proof do you want then.

Elaborate

Empirical. Yes. Thats logical. But i need more information.

Cuz im sure as hell pictures of moon will be written off as nasa hoax.

How about. I dont know the circle that covers the sun during eclipse having the same diameter as the moon.

Well i dont have a reason to think that those are faked in the first place. If we work under premise that what nasa posts is fake. Then we need to set out on our own and take the pictures myself.
In that case both aproaches are incorrect until one of them is proven by evidence we on our own provide.

If you can just claim some source is false you can prove whatever you want. Just say that provided evidence is fake because you disagree with it and there is some conspiracy around it.

What is the issue.

the picure is clearly taken from different points of view.

Because ion the upper one we dont see australia.

Years have nothing to do with it. The point of view is different.

Yeah thats it i cant prove you wrong if you dont listen!

yes i did and now im googling the picure

As i wish to know the source

I found one of them. And aperantly that is not a photo. Is an artist made picure. And a wallpaper.

So you admit they are real then.

By the way. I dont apreciate your threats @Flat Earth PhD

If thats how you run your server i am sorry.

You asume im troling

@Flat earth BEAST then you arent even willing to have a debate

Im suprised you didnt point out different color of the ocean

How can they prove themselves if everything they say is aperantly a lie.

There is a ton of raw pictures but then again there goes the fish eye lens argument

@Flat earth BEAST and all you have to do is get high enough

like idk a baloon