Shaun
Discord ID: 579874251256102922
623 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/7
| Next
Or close to it
To prevent a crash
Market is generally unstable, there's no meaningful difference between a correction or a recession except whether the trust is regained afterwards.
Trust will not be regained, this will cause a crisis of confidence in the concept of global capitalism, not endgame stuff, but it'll suck.
People don't "wake up"
They get annoyed then a small clique amongst them rises up and takes over then the people say "yes that is what I wanted and supported the whole time" when said clique tells them what to think
The people as a whole are docile creatures who only care about bread and circuses, only when you take this away do you get problems.
And their uprising is barely coherent, aimless demands with no understanding of how things work or what they're actually asking for
Wouldn't because slavery prevented the necessary economic pressures that lead to industrialisation
Large plantations lead to significant stakeholders in cheap human labour not expensive high investment labour saving devices.
Same as the American south
Also they didn't have good enough metallurgy to do a proper industrialisation
The urban patricians had plantations
They could have
But didn't
Not really
It requires a significant investment from the medium to large stakeholders to do industrialisation, you could still have artisanal high quality metallurgy, they did in the high medeival ages
Sure, but the initial investment would never be fielded
Needs to be profitable every step of the way or for someone with enough power to force it through to a seen profitable end
Rome didn't have a seen profitable end and slavery prevented it being profitable short term
Theoretically yes
But you could get a steam engine
Or you could get 10 more slaves
And guarantee a profit
And once you have the steam engine you've developed its limited in use
Slaves rarely revolted either
A large enough slave revolt would do it
Not really, you lose out on 10 slaves and get a single use steam engine
It'd take much much much variation to produce the industrial possibilities we know of
Needs way more investment
They'd develop trains
That could save the empire
Same with long distance rapid communication
And centralised industrial weapon production
Yes
With who's money?
Every wealthy person in Rome had money in plantations or political ambitions
Grand urban improvement projects were populist projects to gain political power
Cheapening labour is the opposite of populism
Steam engine takes away jobs short term
That's the point
It's a labour saving device
Means less labour
It'd require basically a long reigning Ceasar to have a weird fascination with steam engines and metallurgy
No it wouldn't
And before it did that it'd unemploy thousands
Yes
That'd be put down
The patricians would never tolerate it
And would tell the plebs that the slaves will take the pleb jobs
Also job shortages weren't a massive problem in Rome till near the end
There's no plausible way for Rome to do it unless a time traveller came from the future and became Ceasar
And just pushed industrialisation for 20 years
Steam engine was never in wide use during Roman Empire
Yes, common fetish for girls these days.
To play the role of a child being predated upon.
Yes.
Seems to be a reflection of abuse or neglect, want a man to take upon the role of their abuser or absent father.
A big dude with a big army burnt the city to the ground
That's the main one
Rome fell due to degeneration of the people physically and spiritually, and then a series of restorative movements rose up attempting to stop this each failing to truly redeem the Roman people.
@Avgvstvs
I'M STRESSED FEEL SORRY FOR ME OH GOD PLEASE
If you're not homosexual maybe you should try it sometime, you'll probably like it
Troglodyte. Did Reddit give you that insult?
I don't care if it's prime minister's question time, dude's a cocksucker
Ohhh no I'm not going to get the great wisdom of a guy who's throwing out meaningless self defamatory insults.
I'm so scared I might miss his immense cosmic understanding he got from browsing Reddit.
Reddit isn't a place, it's a state of mind, and you're in it
He wasn't presenting positions, he was just preening
Christ you're full of yourself
Frustration isn't a position of debate, it's just an expression of state.
His usage of frustration was insulting others under a pretense of civility, I dropped the civility nothing more.
I didn't deny him anything, if his emotional state is determined by someone calling him a retard on the internet then he shouldn't be on the internet.
He should also consider not being retarded
No I would
I hate preening faggots
If he was presenting my position I'd probably talk to him in private
^
This is true
I didn't tell at him
I called him a faggot and Reddit
There's two possibilities here see.
There's possibility A where I am a massive gub gub retard.
Then there's possibility B where I am in fact too smart for you!
Now........ Which is true is a great question
But one which I think is beyond you ;))) if U catch my drift
https://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/026/152/gigachad.jpg
Yes how can you tell
The democrats had basically no win scenario this election cycle, too divided to pick a true unifier candidate, and Dems always have a bigger concern with turnout.
Man this zanabasos guy is so retarded, he upsets me with his ugly unlovable face and how nobody likes him, it's just so terrible when he opens his massive retard mouth and spews shit
I don't care
You're just a preening faggot
Shut up
Voluntary incel 4 lyfe
No
Voluntary incel
Is that your word of the day
Yes
That's why the doctor said
Jews also had disproportionate influence over the British merchant trade
Also a big part of Raj administration
It was Jewish Brits
Yes
But not the exclusively
6 million are you sure? That number doesn't seem right
R U ok dude
Maybe you should chill out
Have a Snickers
Voluntary incel
623 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/7
| Next