Charles V
Discord ID: 452222323714555904
424 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/5
| Next
@Sean/Pippin (INACTIVE) I read the entire document. I find the system lacking to what already exists as the Catholic Confessional State
The importance placed on academics I would judge as misguided. Institutions are products of a people, it's culture and it's religion and they form as a result of their changes, not as a result of the Institution.
It's an attempt to fix the problems inherent in monarchy it looks like. But the assumption that the lack of education is what creates poor ministers is a misconception here
Yes they do
Honestly, the best way to fix the flaws in the philosophy is to recognize the limitations of ideology.
Our Faith is a Universal fractal, a microcosm of all things. We should strive to build our political institutions along the lines by which we were created, God's image.
God is not a Philosophy-King. There needs to be nothing attached to his title to indicate who He is. So too with the name of King.
God is not King because of some virtue God has, but by the fact that He is the creator of the Universe. All else is secondary.
So too, a King is called so because he is the Father or inheritor of a Kingdom. The Pope called so because he's the heir to Saint Peter.
People think monarchy is a tricky thing to reestablish or correct when it has gone awry. This is the worry of many who look at monarchy.
Fascism is a temporary state, but it's often idolized at a final endpoint.
But we have historical precedent for this. For which I will present two examples.
1. Pepin, Son of Charles Martel. Who held all of the power of the Frankish Kingdom and the Legacy of his Father but yet was not King. The Merovingian Kings by that time had become puppets, weak, soft and ineffectual, to the Mayors of the Palace. The Pope himself gave Pepin the blessing to establish the Karlings as the Kings of the Franks saying that he who holds the power of King should also take the name of King. There are extreme times where the Church working together with he who holds the power of King to reestablish the power of Kingdoms.
2. Napoleon. Although beginning as a Left wing Republican, Napoleon saw that only a monarchy can preserve the legacy of mankind and, while dealing with a much weaker Pontiff and Church by then, he sought to establish a monarchy from a Military dictatorship. After gaining all of the Republican powers he could, he still found that a monarchy was superior and the only way to guarantee the survival of the work.
In this we can see how a Fascist dictator might legitimize himself in that of a monarchy, restoring the fabric of a revolution into the tapestry of the Counter-Revolution.
Not so perfect of course, but it's certainly better than waiting for the criminal masters in the Oligarchy called Republic to fail.
Not calling Napoleon a Fascist obviously, but Fascism means so many things to so many people that it isnt you might as well call him a Napolofascist XD
Fascism works, just depends on what you mean by "works" - It's variants are so different that only Italian Fascism can really be called Fascism. Everything else is something else.
It's great that you are trying to follow the Faith under these circumstances ๐
Even if you did it wouldn't be a bad thing
It's natural sometimes. But whats important is that we understand the base emotions behind it.
We're denied the understanding of the divinity of suffering nowadays
Lol
>Shadowbanned
>Banned like fifteen times
>Goodbye /rel ๐ข
>rebrand
>300, trickle of traffic
> Couple months later, 1000+ members posts everyday
Nice try Zucc! Can't sell the /rel/!
Or something "sell the rel doesn't sound that impressive" I'll think of something better later XD
Doing well!
Good morning I hate Americanized minorities
"I dont see Black or Brown. All I see is the clown makeup"
My problem is that most of these americanized minorities think they're expressing their culture when really they're expressing mass produced garbage urban culture mainly created by (((rich white people)))
They might as well be dancing around in clown make up instead of their own skin color. It would be more honest
Someone should make a meme of a Mushroom cloud but it
it's the "Sheeiiit" face instead of the cloud
I wish I knew how to make memes ๐ข
Don't let small things bother you like this unless it's specifically attached to a problem behavior of hers, like if she does this all the time. Chances are she didn't mean to be that way, couldn't see she was being that way and therefore only read your behavior rather than their own as well
Tis common with females
Female who are not Women of Understanding
@Based Chav What be the news?
Gents
I am proud today
@Romanus Drevo Then I don't know what you'd call this
Sense of accomplishment?
I stood up to my local village government today.
And got told, pretty much without abridhement or irony that the powers of the Police are independent of the towns they patrol and that the Justice system is a collection agency for the government.
@Romanus Drevo Local police have been giving out citations like water and the court system has been jammed and people are losing money more money to defend themselves than it would be to pay the tickets. It's affecting the way people live, my family included.
Chicago
I like the way you put that XD
@Romanus Drevo It honestly might as well be.
The people's Democratic Commune of Chicago
DCC
@CPEGaebler Village as in yuppieville suburban. I could only dream that I live in a rural village
@Romanus Drevo Other than my decision to remain in this city unfortunately not.
But I did find out that I live in a police state with a corrupt (((greedy))) [all the local judges are Jews] judiciary
@CPEGaebler Whole thing is recorded by the village
Through their website
I can ask for the video and I would completely love to do that!
I will post it when I find it
Gents
What do you make of this:
Apparently some comments I made about trans people and some other things are getting screenshotted and posted
Should I even care?
Of course
Wouldn't matter very much if it was under an assumed.
Part of me really doesn't care
Because I didn't say anything bad. I deliberately speak in a way that would be understandable and agreeable to normies
It definitely won't threaten any friendships of mine XD I haven't been censored for a while now
And the friends I do have I have personal experience with that no amount of political bullshit could break down, most of those friends agree with me anyways
This actually made him want to join /rel/
Or Trad style in general
@Romanus Drevo I would relish the chance. Besides, he compared the Holocaust to Trans bathroom issues
Its dehumanizing
Just like the Stars
Not being allowed in the military is dehumanizing. Just like Stars of David
Fine I'm a Transphobe and he's an antisemite
I told him he wasn't being dehumanizing
*dehumanized
And that judgement based on political beliefs is wrong,
Also at the same time I'm about to mount a Crusade against my horribly corrupt local village
I saw only one half of my apartment covered in light rain and sunshine with a rabbit hopping through it - Probably thats just superstitious but it's nice set piece regardless
I wouldn't mind having the opportunity to rally some real life action - Legal, nonviolent action
Follow up on that Transgender issue
My Trans friend asked for an apology, I only said I was sorry that he felt negative for what I told him but stood my ground. Eventually he apologized and we're decent now.
And he's not Trans, he's just assexual and a trans trender
So...progress I guess.
I appreciate all of the people who made suggestions and helpful advise, thanks guys ๐
We're both Polish
I found this
with some of my parents old stuff ๐
On some level, our enemy just uses this sort of thing to attack us
On the other hand, the problem is objectively homosexuality and pedophilia, which our enemy is totally fine with
I'd say make them own their own priests, they're their guys not ours. They're sodomites, not Catholics.
Make it clear they are the enemy among us that we know what to do with our enemies who offendth the little ones https://www.ucatholic.com/blog/how-the-ancient-catholic-church-dealt-with-priest-sex-offenders/
If computers go to war with each other is that Hack on Hack crime?
Didn't anyone on the #NeverForget crowd ever think that maybe one day the narrative would turn against them and people would become instead interested in the people who committed the Shoah rather than it's (((victems)))
Wasn't there an inherent and powerful danger in the entire Holocaust Remembrance ideal? Didn't anyone see that? O.o
I just feel like that was a massive slip in oversight there.
@Deleted User It works less and less with every year
@Ironclad "What is real? Define real" - Get Matrix on people who say it was XD
Or wasnt even.
I think it was real, but it was guaranteed to happen by Jewish Elites
The Jewish elites driving the boycotts, the war and the conduct of the war basically guaranteed that the mass starvation, disease, lack of supplies and material and ideological extremes of policy due to the war's conduct that would become the Holocaust
^To keep what they gained in WWI
The rise of Fascism threatened that order
And to expand it.
My problem is that by enshrining the Holocaust they guaranteed that it will remain in the memory of Western people. Problem is that memory goes both ways
The more interest and less baggage and repression about the event, the more people are interested in the people who committed it, and by extension anti-semitism of the past
I agree
424 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/5
| Next