@Quarantine_Zone I wouldn’t let conciliatory anathemas get you down too much. Early Christendom tended to talk overly tough with their anathemas. Before Nicaea I, Alexander of Alexandria started to take issue with Arius. Arius caught wind that he was prolly gonna get condemned so he fled to Constantinople and got Eusebius of Nicomedia to team up with him. Alexander got Arius condemned at a local council, but Arius and Eusebius got Alexander anathematized. Does Eusebius’ anathema stand just because he was part of the one true church?

Think of it this way

In an individual setting, the office of the keys=contingent upon repentance

Even a super ex opere operato Catjolic would agree that unrepentance=no absolution

When it comes to larger, broader excommunications, I tend to look at it as the anathema being contingent upon whether or not it’s biblically faithful

And good luck finding a mandate to venerate icons as prescribed in Nicaea II in the New Testament

Well sure

And your point?

So why does Nicaea II bother you but Trent not?

I love that Trullo affrms multiple mutually exclusive and contradictory Bible canons with anathemas to boot

Aren’t they literal Nestorians?

That’s incredible

Guys we aren’t Nestorians we just use this thing he wrote in our liturgy

Sure, but when your Christology gets damaged, there comes a point where you are worshipping a different Christ

Your point being?

Right

But were you making a larger point?

Gotcja

Fuk my keyboard turned Polzchizchzs on me

Huh

That’s funny

What’s ur country fam

Ah

I was struggling to think of a secularized country where Christianity is still a familiar enough idea for people to stumble into Christian heresies

Hey do y’all know if there’s a legio christi telegram channel? I like that platform better.