try reading what I said carefully

I was talking about law once and dropped a link after my statement and then he asked me for a survey

why would you need a survey

for a law

omg

I was talking about RTC laws in an area, if an area had them. And he asked me for a study

what I'm getting at is that his statement is irrelevant and just trolling

because I asked someone for studies once

what do conservatives think should be done on the topic of housing

for things like prop 13

or just expensive rent costs ect

Well that is why I am asking you what should be done about it

google prop 13 it is a cali law only I believe

@Railingo he is dumb, if he has enough money to do that just leverage the dept and invest it wtf

homeless and low income I guess would be my question

rightnow, where ever homeless people are, wherever rent is insane

Legal is always triggered when I talk in chat

why the fuck would I ask conservatives what we should do about homeless people in different countries

that was fast af

nice edit

no I was talking about the housing topic

have I ever talked to anyone on here about Canadian politics?

I don't know fuck all about Canadian politics

ok here is my proposition then this is off topic

yea cause it matters on a much greater scale

bulldoze a fuck ton of single family homes and build appartments

the poor ones specifically

the cheep old ugly homes

bulldoze them

you have to pay compensations also they are probably renting

do they own more than 50%

oh

zoning is usually shit

and people wont vote to fix it because their property value will fall

mental illness is only like 25% I believe

yea, cancel rent control. What is wrong with foreign investment

speculation in housing doesn't happen as much as people say it does. and we can just tax empty property

it is also really hard to find a number on it

yea do it

oh wait

you think people shouldn't lose their house if they cannot pay their taxes

because it is an asset I believe

it gains or losses value like a stock

a stock?

capital gains is bullshit

yes

except the foreing investment yea I agree with him

@Beemann how is it doing that?

what would be the difference if a rich Canadian owned it instead

the only reason they bought that investment is because they had CAD they needed to use in Canada

I already said tax or make speculation illigal

do you care if the houses are being rented out

ok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MNZoPDmvqA

what is the opinion here on the arms trade act being dropped?

what is the opinion here on the arms trade act being dropped?

yea that one

would you make the same argument for those who fail background checks?

ah stopping them here will just make them get one illegally

would you not argue the states barred by the act are the ones that have proven irresponsible?

treaty

do you really think selling guns to northkorea will end with its population getting guns?

I don't see the difference in not selling to a bad person vs a bad state

no because if you send guns into north korea who gets the guns?

the question isn't about your thoughts on international law

if the USA follows the bill would you care

and what would your argument be for selling guns to places where the government would use them for war crimes

how is this different like I said before than a bad guy buying a gun

then make it just a US law

@A. Spader why do you think there needs to be a boarder between the USA and Canada?

ok Uncephalized

🙂

true im going off its basics 'dont sell guns to shitty states'

I'm just wondering cause you said you thought globalism is a ploy to destroy national sovereignty

yea and I want to know why you guys think there must be a boarder between Canada and America

?????????????????????

ok

why can't people just walk over the boarders like states? Different laws would be the only thing to worry about

well if you make a legal line I wouldn't protect it

just like states

yea

sure, I would agree. My goal would be if you agree with me here then if Mexico stabilizes the same way the USA and CA are then there would be no reason to enforce that one either

I would also want all 3 countries to adopt the US dollar federally

I don't care about Culture

it would be the north american economy

and they could split the bill on costs for printing it

until inevitably the 3 states merge into a country governed under 3 provinces or states where there are the same small differences with one tax policy

oh here is a good meme I heard from a friend

we keep the illegals as keep labour to lower the cost of goods because they work for so little

cheap*

no it would be a gain for everyone because cheaper products

this is why you don't want to raise minimum wage

this looks so dumb

yea

put the taxes towards those areas

would you rather the burden of people making enough to live be on the economy or the governmnet

yea but there will always be people stuck at wallmart and macdonalds

and at the moment those peoples livelyhoods are being covered by the government

so would you rather force the company to raise wages increasing the cost of their products