That term is technically correct, without a strong family unit whitey would never acquire the amount of power necessary surpassing that of other peoples to be able to establish his supremacy. But that, is why Noseberg and his allies fears us.
Its the only way that the Equalitarian Cult's doctrine of Equality can in any way be justified, otherwise Equality collapses into itself. Because than it turns out that no, we are not Equal and its not some mysterious force that's preventing the Equality from manifesting itself, but Nature itself.
It must also be understood that with the collapse of Equality, all the -isms, -phobes and -ions such as racism,sexism,ableism,homophobe,transphobe,xenophobe,discrimination,segregation lose their negative moral value and become at a minimum neutral.
Aggression has nothing to do with Equality, and its an Equalitarian myth that without all being considered equal, those on the lower end suddenly become justified targets of aggression.
I dont like pinapple pizza, or a pizza parlor selling pineapple pizza, or a pizza parlor refusing to serve pineapple pizza, so these are all morally negative because I dont like what they are doing
Here's the thing, if Equality is the natural order of things, if Equality is the natural order. Than to treat people differently it in essence increases the deviation from that natural order of equality, but if the natural order does not have equality in it, it makes no difference.
Why do we have a problem with degenerates but that they are or cause deviations from the natural order? And we have our particular values that we ascribe to the Natural order, and if you deviate from that than you deviate from the Natural Order.
You can't challenge the fact that I have a right to my property, we are not Equal so there isn't any "but your property makes you more unequal vis a vis the Equalitarian natural order so we gotta cut it back to make you end closer to it"
And with that you get another part of the final key: If the store owner kicks vegans or blacks or whoever, he has a RIGHT to it because entailed within Property Rights is the right to decide who is given permission to enter your property, and who is not.
An application of this is that if you want your ethnostate, just buy up huge stretches of territory and make them white only, or black only, or whatever ethno is supposed to occupy the land, and nobody will be able to put a moral challenge to you. There is no need for aggression, you can just buy out the others in the way and kick them out. In essence once you get ownership of the land automatically get the right to kick out whoever you wish. As long as you own the property
The pineapple pizza eater can easily crush any moral challenge, just as the property owner who decides who can enter his property will be able to beat them in a non-Equalitarian world
8/10 is like: But muh ethnic food, but I need house cleaners, but I like their music, but I wanna see different cultures, it makes it easier to learn other languages, they make jerbs and GDP n shiet etc
And no, its experience with women... the reason why women value it is because it is difficult for a man to sleep around, the gays have like 1k partners each so I don't think the same counts for them regardless.
