no principles at all other than "fairness"

see, I don't agree with the white nationalist view that civilisation is an outcome of group genetics I think circumstance and coincidences can have extremely massive effects on the outcome of a given civilisation and I would take north korea and south korea as examlles. Are they really so different genetically?

they might be more different than most of us would assume

It must also be understood that with the collapse of Equality, all the -isms, -phobes and -ions such as racism,sexism,ableism,homophobe,transphobe,xenophobe,discrimination,segregation lose their negative moral value and become at a minimum neutral.

but we don't know, because there's really no nork dna data available

and that is why multiculturalism is good political business @Chawosaurian

I strongly doubt the division of north and south korea could be traced to genetics

they have nothing else to offer humanity. they'd be rendered into less useful in a heterogeneous society

Multiculturalism follows Democracy, and Democracy follows Equality

this was what, 5000 years ago? nothing has changed

@Chawosaurian I think you could argue that in an unequal society its still improper to be hateful towards others. If you see someone in a wheelchair and you knock them over you're still an asshole even if we agree that being in a wheelchair is not prefarable.

he nailed it 5000 years ago

damn

nothing to improve upon

@Boniface The lack of equality and the collapse of all the -isms and -phobes does not mean aggression becomes neutral or positive as well.

aristotle, being a bedrock thinker of western civ, we;ve known this for 5 millenia

but all of a sudden, something changed in our western thinking ✡️

Aggression has nothing to do with Equality, and its an Equalitarian myth that without all being considered equal, those on the lower end suddenly become justified targets of aggression.

I don't see how the isms would collapse though. If someone yells they hate nibbas and shoots up a black church ppl will ssy thats racist even if they accept ppl are not equal

They collapse in that its not a negative moral thing any longer.

our great grandfathers understood what aristotle was saying. the most uneducated peasant understood too. now we have men in dresses telling us "lol, no!"

And again, conflating no equality with aggression.

Equality is not what deters aggression or makes it have a negative moral value.

yeah but I don't think ppl consider hatred of others to be bad just because we are equal

It would be neutral.

Just as hating certain food is neutral.

why

Because it becomes a preference.

And nothing more

I think most of the time if someone gets called out for racism its for acting on it

its not just a private thought

What action

Under Equality the private thoughts are also morally negative.

lets say you're a landlord and you decide to kick all your black tenants out, because its your preference

But yes what action exactly.

ppl will still say thats racist

And without Equality, doesn't matter

Would people even care at that point

because it has nothing to do with equality

its about tolerance of difference