✿ Mittens ✿
Discord ID: 111576918779772928
839 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/9
| Next
Hmmmm.
I wonder why you guys are even in this server.
I mean, that's not the sort of opinions sargon has.
Mmmm yeah, gimme that hate for the mentally handicapped.
Mmmm yeah, gimme that war
I'm all for eliminating the concept of gender.
Gender is just a false dichotomy. If you google the definition of gender or look up the world health organization definition, it will tell you that it's a social construct. That means that the way people behave is given an arbitrary societally defined definition of gender, and it's totally subjective. Anyone can behave as one gender or another regardless of their genitals. Men can behave like women, women can behave like men. I personally think we should just get rid of the concept of gender and let people behave however they want, because then no one would be oppressed for simply expressing themselves in a certain way, and we wouldn't have to worry about all these unnecessary concepts. It's different from sexuality too, because whereas in sexuality you need to have these labels so you can identify who you can be partners with and not guess who's straight and who's gay, you don't really need to know what another person's gender is.
I wrote a paper on this subject in my multicultural literature class in college.
Hey man, if you like being ignorant I understand.
How ironic.
I never said anything about assuming gender. I said gender is a social construct, which should be eliminated.
I don't think we should have gender at all, not two, not 70, just let people be people.
That's pretty rude.
I think you should go and study the original james bond.
He was an actual gentleman who exemplified what a man should be.
Sean Connory as james bond.
This GumbyShrimp guy is just a peach, isn't he?
Not really.
If it assumed that boys couldn't express their feelings without violence then why would it be saying that they could be taught not to?
No it's not.
I just want to remind you guys that I'm against sjws too, we're not so different than you think :v
I'm running out of non binary memes
😱
Oh no, I'm sorry @meratrix
If I've upset anyone I apologize, I'm all about kindness.
Oh gosh, you're welcome :3
I don't remember sargon of akkad calling for a specific version of masculinity <:think_cartoon:378717098618388491>
You wanna fuck my ass?
Lewd
I don't remember sargon of akkad saying anything about hating furries either 🤔
It's almost as though you guys are just sort of randomly in here for no reason and have no moral alignment with sargon of akkad at all
Oh yeah, mock the disabled some more mmmm, it's so juicy.
I care about my own feelings, but morality is subjective.
I am. I don't take anything as absolutely true.
At least not subjective concepts like morality.
I don't like rape, I wish rape wouldn't happen.
I just don't think morality is objective, so you can't say anything is absolutely wrong.
It won't matter, because whoever disagrees with you, you wouldn't be able to argue with them from a logical standpoint.
Morality is entirely societally constructed, so even if I were to dislike rape, which I do, I wouldn't be able to say it's morally wrong because it's impossible to make that into a logical argument.
Yeah, but you can't argue logically with someone who thinks rape is okay.
they didn't arrive at that position logically, because morality isn't a logical thing. It's literally just group think.
If you really hate collectivism so much, you would reject morality, because that's basically the essence of collectivism.
I'm not a sociopath, I feel a lot of empathy and concern for issues.
My point is a philosophical one about the natural of morality.
You can't argue someone out of a point they didn't arrive to with reason, with reason.
I don't support rape.
You misunderstand my point.
If I were to say rape is wrong, then that won't stop people from being rapists.
I think I do understand my point.
Yes, reality is objective.
But individual perception is subjective.
Every human being perceives reality subjectively.
That is why so many people have different ideas of how the world works.
Reality exists outside of our heads unchanging, but every person perceives it differently and their perception of reality is subjective.
If you have a moral, that's basically you imposing your subjective reality onto an objective world. Other human beings, in spite of having subjective perception, are objectively existing beings. Every human being's thoughts objectively exist, and a moral is a command of someone else to change the nature of their reality (which is to say the nature of their being). Since each person can have a different view of what reality is, each person can have a different view of what morality is. Since everyone can have a different view of what morality is, there's no way to say that there's an objectively true morality. Furthermore, the objective reality that exists outside of our heads obviously doesn't care about whether or not we're moral, because it created a world which is profoundly uncaring about our survival. It created a world where animals are basically in a food chain to survive; there is obviously no morality built into the world.
I like me.
Mmmm yeah gimme that sissyphobia
I don't have any pretense that me pushing my views on anyone will change anything, dan.
I realize that morality is subjective, an endless struggle just like animals competing in the food chain.
I'm sorry knopfler, but you can see that basically everyone is talking to me at once.
If I missed your question I would be happy to answer it.
Do I have any mental defects?
No
lmao "aside from non binary"
thank you
I take pride in that
How is that nsfw?
He had pants on.
oh, sorry.
You know Sargon of Akkad is an atheist, right?
d a m n
I don't really like text chats when it comes to having real interactions with people. Any time I interact with someone it's always better when it's in person. Every time I go to a chat room it's pretty much the same nonsense. I get along much better with people in person or in voice, because there's always a bunch of nuance which can be picked up on which makes everything more sincere. Online it's just a bunch of people who say stuff to you they wouldn't say to you because they're behind the mask of anonymity, and they don't actually see you face to face so they can't make real communication. In text chat, I don't really let along with leftists or the right wing, I'm always sort of in this undefinable purgatory in which I seem to piss off whatever group I'm a part of. I don't really have that problem in person, because people can see the expression on your face and know when you're being honest or fucking with them. When people can see that you're being honest then actual dialog can take place.
one sec, it won't connect
hold on, I get this dumb ICE checking no route error
I'll tell you when I connect
In case anyone wants to see it, this is that science article by harvard about transgender biology.
^
Look up The Last Days of Socrates by Plato
Oh, look up bertrand russell's history of western philosophy.
That is a good intro.
But you should read the actual philosophers too.
But Bertrand Russell does a great rundown to help you get into it.
839 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/9
| Next