@Shiba Inu How does that make him a Nazi LARPer? A Nazi LARPer is someone who uses neo nazi cancer phrases like 88 and uses fascist symbols of a party that had fundamental differences with the core politics of National Socialism, all in the while never reading what being a National Socialists means (and that goes for every single ideology, not just NatSoc’ism)

As long as you understand National Socialism in its core, then you can identify as one.

@Shiba Inu Spoken like somebody who can’t formulate a point. Speaks low levels of your intelligence 🅱️ro

Who said that they’re a Neo Nazi?

Neo nazis are Aryan Brotherhood trash. Prison birds who flip drugs in their neighbourhoods, fucking cowards. Should stamp out their swastika tatted heads with steel capped hobnail boots

@Ewolfa “worst ideologies” means shit I am against lmao

Im not religious. Easy.

says the one who supports a jewish messiah

in all honesty, I see Christians as allies but I do not see them as useful in the systems I'd put into place. Culturally, Christianity represents Western civilisations history and for that, it must be preserved. Objectively, we don't need them for anything else politically. Economically, sure, perhaps? Maybe through taxation but that's it lol

did you not read what I just said

lol

It's a big part of it, don't kid yourself

@Deleted User an extremely narrowminded way of viewing it lol. Medieval values =/ = our modern values. Their concepts of "racial unification" was very different. What separated people back then was largely religion (and other key cultural aspects), but not necessarily race. If anything, "Muh Northern Pagan Brothers "were to blame for their own demise and were equally as much of a threat to Western Civilisation as was Islam.

But

That doesn't matter, because there's several crusades (aside from the trash 4th crusade) that proves Christians were ready to fight Islamic aggression, which, is why the crusades happened in the first place. So even when you tried to call Christianity out for not reacting to Islamic aggression, you're wrong because you didn't google the First Crusade

The 4th Crusade, by the way, was unpopular back then as it is unpopular today.

Yeah, Romans were pagans, but that civilization crumbled in 476AD. How did the Western Roman empire collapse? Pagans, Lol. Christianity kept Western Civilisation alive if anything.

The irony that this dude thinks sending a few priests to pagan lands is equal to "yeah nah lets sack Lindisfarne and then later Paris because thor wills it"

WeStErN bRoThErS

Christianity is the reason you can fucking read English for fuck sakes

English wouldn't exist WITHOUT Alfred the Great who was a ***devout Christian***

There's so much convoluted shit in Christian history underneath that iron cladded- Modern- historical- revisionist icing people seem to shit out of their asses these days

@Deleted User
Yikes, a straw man.

You’re not understanding the point that I am making.

No Christianity wasn’t perfect, and, you’re quite figuratively speaking of a fart in Christianity’s 2000 year history.

The crux of the argument is here (seeing as you missed it): Christianity’s role in Western Civilianisation, for better or for worse, is one of the key reasons we have it.

You’re doing a lot of arguing as to why Christianity is bad in government (hence your education strawman); but this was never a conversation of Christianity’s importance in government, it was always to do with its importance in Western history. History that needs to be preserved in order to keep WC alive. It’s attribution to our way of life today should be highlighted, but Religion should never have political power. That was my argument.

***Yes I do attribute English to Christianity because Anglonised Latin was made possible by Alfred the Great who wanted to unite the Christian Kingdoms. Literature, art and culture that evolved from his time through policies made by him and his son, Edward the Wise, eventually paved way to the language that you are speaking now***

The point to be taken from that is not that I suggest institutionalised Christianity created English, rather, how devout Christians of the time made English (and its cousins) possible because of their devout nature to advancement in technology and ***Culture***

I’m not even talking shit against Paganism as if I think Pagans haven’t attributed to Western Civilisation (Romans blah blah gay greeks blah blah)
It’s more so that Christianity is the reason we can even remember that past, because Christian’s were the only ones through history who wanted to keep it alive. Nordic Pagans didn’t even know this shit happened, what’s Latin compared to a few Runes on a rock?

So Ill reiterated: Christianity deserves to be remembered and preserved as a cultural importance in WC history, but it should not be political.

(Also you speak as if Pagans were just a happy bunch amongst themselves lol, is that why Rome conquered Pagans rather than just monotheists like the Jews?)

Honestly pan Europeans can be so fucking cringey sometimes as if they think Europe was a massive Iron Fist, start to finish

“Christians never fought for Europe.”
Lol! The very reason you get to call it fucking Europe is because Christianity expanded and set stone in your idea of a Europe 😂

Again, you are mixing modern ideals and thinking with Medieval Europe. Europe today is just the result of Christian nations being congregated in a single spot on the map.

Do you even understand that what you call Europe is only Europe because people, sometime ago, looked on a map and thought “these are all the Christian countries, these are the heathens to the east- we have our Europe west of the heathens lol”

Europe was whatever was Christian on the continent.

Im not explaining why you are wrong again lol

The biggest and what you would call “Civilisation in Europe” was the Romans

The Romans became Christians long before 476, and the ERE kept it going until the 1400 hundreds. So, those record your speak of, ended in 476 with Christianity, and were preserved by Christians thereafter. (Including translations- after 476, Latin became dormant and forgotten but Christian monasteries kept it alive- another + 1 for Christianity)

Whatever, I got to get up for work in a few hours. Good luck with erasing one of the biggest influences in Western Civilisation while memorising the meanings of a handful of runes

Thought I’d wait around to see if you’d apply modern thought processes to medieval history again

Did not disappoint lol

Imagine being Nazbol, unironically

@Deleted User I try

Imagine being Jewish

Addie is a tranny, it was in a discord channel before

@Riley gross weirdo

It*

I’m sorry but, when it comes to abortion, your sister should had gotten the coat hanger

Sometimes I wish that I got the coat hanger, because here we are, being miserable as fuck doomers

Watching the world burn

Ahahaha

No

The world needs to burn if anything is going to turn around. A reset, which will see the weak die and the strong survive

Like good fucking luck ever seeing your ideologies even partly represented in mainstream politics in this day and age.

Popular media has ensured that people will be drones, don’t kid yourselves, fools.

Don’t ask me though, ask the 🅱️onkler

lmao, good results

Getting drunk isn't bad, just be aware of what you are doing. Seriously, it isn't that fucking hard to think when knocked off your socks. You think Germans quit drinking beer during the NS days? Fuck no

What isn't okay, is fucking alcoholism on the level of Einstein. Cheating, beating, and drinking yourself to death is the problem, having a few cold ones with the boys is fine.

It's not even moderation, it's **being responsible** that is key

Post

Results

Autocracy is synonymous with dictatorship. Mines less specific for whatever reason

you got me there trooper

@Riley you’re tranny filth so it doesn’t matter what you think

@el pebble show us what your closest ideology was

Go on

**coward**

😂

Under tradition

It should state your closest ideology

@Riley Just so I’m not only making an ad hominem attack, I will briefly say tradition is important to maintain culture (for whatever that culture is). Not hard to understand.

Ah that’s because I was looking at the bottom because I have a PC

@Deleted User Nah, you definitely tailored your results. I naturally selected what I believed

@Riley the shit you were spewing in the other discord you got kicked from is immature, you weirdo. Gross.

@Wiktor VI pro Gay pride shit

@Wiktor VI we thought it was a troll but it ended up getting defensive

I don’t even know what the fuck it is doing in groups like these

Addie is a filthy egalitarian

@Riley I think it’s hypocritical how you want people to give you legitimate reasons as to why the big gay is bad but your only comments thus far is “Natsocs Are basement dwellers”

😂

Nah unmute the weirdo now, I want to see what legitimate claims it has against National Socialism

@Riley Oh poor child, I’m at work so you’re just gonna have to wait until I’m on break kiddo

Actually, I never outright said that I’m NatSoc. I’m sympathetic but I wouldn’t call myself NatSoc.

By all means, I want to see your critical analysis on National Socialism.

Then I’ll actually give my real opinion on the big gay, and why you should be yeeted

Do they know the motive?

Rockwell used the word to remove its negative connotation, so yeah Nazi is applicable but I prefer to say NatSoc because it’s hip and I always think of some soyboy on Buzzfeed emphasising the word like “Naht-see”

And yes I used hip ironically

It’s someone’s drawing of it

But I colourises it

Colourised*

@Riley I’m just telling you to post your critical analysis on National Socialism, I don’t know why you keep referring to paganism and asking “what kind of National Socialism” - just post a damn argument against it.

Otherwise you have no right to ask anybody else for “legitimate arguments” against gays. I’ll give you an easy one, National Socialist Germany. The leadership is irrelevant. I want an legitimate argument against its place in government and policy’s put in place at the time (also in context of the era).

@Riley That’s not what I asked for, National Socialism in Germany became an autocracy out of happpen chance, the ideology however isn’t bound to autocracy (which is why I told you that the leadership is irrelevant).
Yes NS Germany would had suffered similar fates as the Roman Empire, but before WW2 there is a lot that the NS doctrine opened up in Germany.
That is what I’m asking you to critique, saying that NS Germany would had collapsed because of the leadership isn’t a critique on National Socialism, but a critique on leadership.
No I do not think National Socialism is perfect, which is why I am only sympathetic, but there was a lot of good done.

Give me a critique on National Socialism (ideology, policies, fundamentals or the form of all 3)

@Riley What am I not being clear on?

@Shiba Inu ah yes, Juche, where the state that invented the ideology also abuses its’ own people

@Riley I’m literally asking you to critique a National Socialism, the ideology.

So far you’ve only made a hypothetical statement about the leadership of NS Germany

@Shiba Inu I can’t believe I’m doing this but I agree with the tranny

Though it has worked in the past, Authoritarianism in the 21st century is way too easy to destabilise. For it the hold an iron fist, we’d first need “global civilisation” to collapse, and thus the “natural order” will eventually bring about strong authoritarian factions to strive.

@Shiba Inu how does that make me a libtard? Just because I’m smart enough to realise that in the 21st century, any form of authoritarianism is quickly squashed or isolated, doesn’t mean that I’m against authoritarianism.

@Redneck Rosteen Jew

Wake the fuck up Samurai, we’ve got globalism to burn

@Deleted User Ah, you wouldn’t like the solo artist Crywank

Well actually you could blame the feud on several things including but not limited to, Holodomor...

@Deleted User definitely hit the mark with capitalism