adolphus the sorrowful
Discord ID: 170941986075967498
378 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/4
| Next
Immigration isn't inherently beneficial to capitalists
Especially when it isn't under a capitalist system
If it's a socialist society it isn't capitalist
That's how
It's not replacement though
The great replacement has been thoroughly debunked
Cut that bs pls
So any data?
That hasn't been thoroughly discredited
So it isn't actually cultural replacement. Its racial. And this doesn't mean that whites literally shrunk as a group. They just have less of a share of the population because after immigration (specifically 1965) reform, the population grew exponentially
None of this points to whites being "replaced", except that last article which I bet
No I'm not. It literally isn't replacement
The population is just growing
Whites are still@there
Not being replaced
More people are just coming in
Not comparable
who gives a fuck bout a motherland doe
what good is that in a completely new country
with new laws and new culture
@CaesarKonrad did you even read ur own article my man lol
The new statistics project that the nation will become โminority whiteโ in 2045. During that year, whites will comprise 49.7 percent of the population in contrast to 24.6 percent for Hispanics, 13.1 percent for blacks, 7.9 percent for Asians, and 3.8 percent for multiracial populations (see Figure 1).
it's saying exactly wtf i was saying. Just because you're no longer the majority doesn't make you a minority.
that isn't how statistics works
^ kind of like race is really arbitrary and stupid as it exists conceptually
wtf r u even saying cat, I'm saying that just because you no longer make up the majority of something doesn't mean ur a minority. 49% is still bigger than each of those numbers, there will just be more ethnic minorities than there were in the past
also extrapolations from current trends isn't really reliable
anything could happen in the next 30 years that could very well flip shit ok it's head, so take them with a grain of salt
therefore ... whites are still more prevalent than everyone else, there are just more people than there were before
Not hard
Keep up pls
duh numbah lowah doe ๐ณ
it is tho
At least how it has been expressed for the last 400 years
Ever since the age of exploration where it became profitable to enslave entire populations of brown ppl really
The fluidity of who is white and what white means for example. Hispanics and Irish people weren't considered white until recently. It's not like their genetic makeup changed into white
They just became more accepted socially into the very exclusive white people only club demographic
they were considered brutish and ape-like (both also comparisons made with blacks), with an entirely different physiognomy than the Anglo-Saxon typical American white, and were often given the same treatment as other marginalized groups. Effectively segregating them from WASPS
But in any case
Yes actually there are Hispanic whites
Theyre made reference to in the statistics that you lot gave me yesterday to shit on immigrants
not you specifically, I think it was sato specifically but you were all yelling at me about the same thing so I grouped you together lol
also cringe @OrthoGoat
stop schizoposting
how am I a tankie
so
de leonism predates even the USSR
it like by definition can't be tankie man
there weren't even any socialist experiments in existence when it was conceived of
hitler duh
don't like Stalin but I don't like hitler harder
cause he's a Nazi
i'm at complete axiomatic odds w him and his beliefs
because my ideas and the ideals the USSR were founded upon are both at least philosophically aligned. and I generally agree, but still. I think I can agree with and understand Stalin more than hitler
collective ownership of the means of production, planned economy, social equality at least (one of the things I disagree with soviet policy, their system of wages and heavy state suppression of workers)
I don't fw state capitalism
good joke ๐
๐๐
capitalism really sux man
how does that make me a larper though
By collective ownership I mean
Democratically organized
Socialist industrial unionism
that's how
It's the most analogous to the modern government imo
yea so basically, there's an industrial congress that, instead of politicians, is operated by unions of workers representing different industries and their interests
kinda yea
and how is this larping
pls explain
I said I vaguely align with Stalin because he was a socialist and I share more interests with him than a Nazi
I didn't think that was very revolutionary
but apparently it blew ur fuckin mind lol
how
how am I not aligned w Stalin
And how is this larp
Except german capitalists backed hitler and hitler protected capital and the capitalists attacked the Soviet Union since its inception lol
I can help you understand ig just hold tight
the first graph shows the share of national income that went to capital in Germany between 29 and 41
not really
but since you want to talk about workers rights, even though I was talking about protecting capital
hitler liquidated many labor unions and labor leaders and replaced them with a government regulated labor union
yeah... so did I. That's why it's called capitalism after all
And the share of national income that went to capital grew under the Nazis
So
Idk what else you'd call that
Except protecting capital
yeah and that's another problem I have with the soviets as a socialist industrial unionist
Labor organization was organized by the state mostly
How does criticizing the soviets make me a tankie again? Lol
Or a larper
Or whatever
Just because I recognize that I share more in common with a socialist than a Nazi
no. you said that the Nazis were pursuing an alternative to capital and because of that I was aligned to both. I was just saying that was bullshit lol
it depends on how profit is being used @Spergerger returns on capital can be used to benefit people or line the wallets of businessmen.
378 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/4
| Next