We're funded by the ADL

@Deleted User we have some debates

There's a lot of them

@anthr0pos let's do it

Trump is the big gay

More like MABA

@tela make it pink

@tela make it a role which is shown separately too

@Deleted User about what

@Deleted User A nation shouldn't care about non-citizens.

That's my statement.

I define a nation as a group of people who share kinship, customs and language and a citizen as anyone who has the corresponding 3

@Deleted User true, but for the purposes of this debate no

@Deleted User yes

@Deleted User what do you mean?

@Deleted User so what if other countries don't like us (the hypothetical nation)? As long as we're strong enough to defend ourselves, a bit of dislike is fine.

@Deleted User true, but invasion is one thing and discriminating against foreigners within one's borders is another. Obviously we should only invade if we're ready, but who would go to war over a couple foreigners?

@Deleted User if it's done for the betterment of citizens then yes. In the Ukrainian war are we talking from a Russian or Ukrainian perspective?

I suppose. Not specifically in foreign affairs or always in foreign affairs, just whenever it's necessary. It should be done as little as possible.

@Deleted User 1. Then I suppose the oath needs to be modifed from all people to all citizens. 2. Obviously law enforcement should care about criminals, the statement wasn't meant to contradict that.

Usually

@Deleted User 1. So they "aren't a doctor" I don't really care about the specifics as long as they ensure the health of thr citizenry. If other countries don't like it, then perhaps they can pay to have their citizens cared for. 2. Caring= giving a shit about their health and well-being.

not necessarily. The purpose of a fair trial would just be to determine who needs to be punished.

the motivation is to punish the right person, not whether an innocent foreginer is punished.

they would be tried normally but probably punished harder if guilty

yes

@Deleted User so are you russian?

ye

@Deleted User what are you?

@Deleted User are you uralic or germanic?

@Deleted User Finland possesses two distinct ethnicities: the uralic finns and the germanic finns or finnish swedes. Which are you?

well the two groups are probably mixed together.

@Deleted User tell me more of these tribes

@Deleted User what do you mean about mixing?

@Sternberg#1022

True

Manstein was gay as well, that's what the man is for

I was just banging your mum actually @Crusader

@Deleted User just find dacian pagans who can teach you or something

You are kinda roman tho @Deleted User

If dacian paganism has no info on it, then better to mix it with roman than something else.

@Deleted User if you're not willing to mix roman stuff in then what are you gonna do?

Arminius was German.

Why is he a hero to you?

The Byzantine empire had other differences. Like the fact it didn't control the same territory

His definition of Fascism was bad.

@Veritas are you a half-breed or a quadrune?

1/4 of one thing 3/4 another

Ah ok

Were you born in Britain?

Ok

Do you speak german?

@Notso aren't you a monarchist

The actual masterrace are cats. They've secretly been using humans for their own benefit.

@Traveler a jew actually told me that once.

If were truly the masterrace they'd be able to achieve things themselves, instead of through trickery and proxies.

Once revealed they're nothing.

@Vlaaaad are there any newer news on that?

cause that was in 2015

I wouldn't nuke anyone, I'd force people to make me their leader or set of the nukes

Thanks

Folk=nation dufus

A Nation is a group of people who share customs, kinship and language and traditionally live on certain land.

@Notso he was criticizing nationalism.

Football is the most serious thing out there.

Fun fact: different groups of chimpanzees have been known to wage wars of destruction against other groups. One group might take all the territory from another and kill all the other chimps.

^

@Juan Filly yes that would be chinese nationalist

How would it not be?

Nationalism implies loving one's nation, which can lead to imperialism.

@Juan Filly you can not invade people, but in my opinion caring about the well being of foreigners isn't nationalist.

I think you could colonize properly but then again I don't know all the facts. But I think that if a modern military landed in africa and shot niggers on sight they'd probably win.

In my opinion fighting in africa for the length of time required is fine. You'd probably have to make extensive use of indirect killing through bombing and gas plus playing African groups off against each other.

@anthr0pos obviously I wouldn't invade Africa until internal problems have been solved

@Juan Filly the main advantage is lebensraum and power for the nation, which any fascist would want surely...

If you kill all the native there'd be little race mixing and no mutli culturalism

Plus the British colonial era had very little race mixing or mutli culturalism and they were more moderate.

The African continent wouldn't unite until it was too late. Because I wouldn't be genociding africans only a specific ethnic group of africans.

A nation's entire army wouldn't be needed to conquer one African country.

Just invade the weakest African country. Then one next to that and so on for many years until you hold all the land you can get

The Rhodesians were British

@Taddesse that wouldn't overextend your military

Not if done right

@Taddesse well I don't know for 100% but I don't think that'll happen with the right strategy.

@Taddesse the one used in the Boer war+ not caring about civilian casualties.

Didn't the Italians use a similar strategy in libya

A european military would certainly have the latter

^

@Taddesse I'm not talking about invading africa rn tho. I'd invade after having a military built up.

@Juan Filly building up a military doesn't take that long

@Juan Filly then get that back too. The soviet union indistrialized and militarized at the same time, very quickly over at most a decade

There's still plenty of steel in Britain. It really doesn't matter how long it take because no one would invade before it's done

Britain managed to conquer some shit with what it has before

Somalia is in a civil war and is significantly lacking in modern arms

They have very few tanks or aircraft

Countries should always be at least lead by one nation. But Ukraine is pretty homogenous right @Maksim

It's more or less a true nation-state right?

Bigger than I thought actually. Do they want to be part of Ukraine?

@Maksim if they identify as Russian, you guys should kick them out.

@Maksim how is Orban fighting for high birthrates?