your telling me edge boi teenage vampires that sparkle isn't what you considered as the agents of darkness?

Twilight fan: *you just don't get it guhhh, its not made for you*

Ew

get outta here borg

assimilate the garbage somewhere else

no

hence why I call it garbage

I wonder how that would turn out if you said that to a Migrant NPC

how long would it take the average political ideologue to screech how bad that is ?

technically you do

you have a monarch

Like an Ant colony cant be run by a queen?

ye ok there borg

I mean there is a reason the average foot soldier are called "drones"

coincidence? I think NOT

sometimes I take the batteries out of my calculator to get back at the borg

the small victories are what counts

ok I hide it in the dark so it cant get solar energy

I also turn it on..... but I dont use it....

Bwhhahahah

we do what we must to survive

can you hear that? Thats the sound of a thousand lamps being unplugged.....

Computer: "Why do we exist if just to suffer?"

*proceeds to download the dummest things on the internet*

“The boomers”

They even fixed a bomber

So check mate nerds

Are SJWs secretly just irradiated ghouls who hate people with smooth skin?

https://youtu.be/m75OSHbzb8s

I think in dead rising 2 they had a activist group that wanted the fair treatment of zombies

So your always gonna get people like that oddly enough

They want them to be treated like humans

Hence they oppose them being used in a killing TV show

Their acronym name of CURE stands for citizens for undead rights and equality

Looks like that Robert E Lee statue in Charlottesville got saved from being torn down by a circuit court judge

People with power often get into power.... kinda the way it works....

To be fair punishment should be levied if they continue to try and usurp the will of the people

Indeed it they continue to pursue this path then I say the public has all rights to go after them

Both civil and non civil

Which naturally is coming from the weighted element that is the question being asked and was already answered

People would argue the domestic populace represent the governmental will. Which is not true universally but has merit to it.

I mean perhaps in the UK but in the US there is reason we keep our guns to our chests

There is an obviously balance of power in terms of checks and balance within the system. Should it fail to uphold the balance then the populace are the ones who are levied to correct said imbalance

Yep

Was debating civil war stuff

I think it’s a key element but not innately the reason for war to Happen.

Like the revolution wasn’t over taxes

Well I’m glad I could help. It’s a interesting topic overall. I just think people tend to levy a negative stigma because we in the modern context innately correlate slavery as bad. And since it’s a factor the ones who in turn are aligned to it are viewed as unjust.

When again it’s not the whole story

Ye idk what’s up with them. I think they lost their momentum since they couldn’t innately find people to argue over the topics they wanted.

In that they are polarized enough to make it entertaining.

I’ve offered various topics for them to try both historical or not but I’m not sure what’s going on behind the scenes.

Which one were you asking about?

Ye they wanted to have a “joke” session to break out the seriousness of it since they weren’t getting people for their other stuff

I think it’s a fair idea but idk if having after only the 2nd debate makes much sense lol

Ye I think they were expecting more immediate responses

They should invite some big names in like they did with arch

That brought in the views for sure

True personally think it’s kinda hard not to justify the crusades

In that it happened if you look it at as adefensive action

It’s defiantly a knee jerk response in the modern context

It’s pretty much a way to justify Islamic extremists and frame themselves as defensive in their actions on the west

When it’s just not true in the slightest lol

The west has pressured the Middle East but not in a frame of religious dominance. Which is what the jhihadis and fundamentalists are after.

No it doesn’t hence terrorism is not targeting the state who are responsible for the actions in the Middle East

All terrorists do is make people more annoyed at middle eastern people and now are less aggrieved if said government continues to bomb them

Think in a way you are considering you said the action is proper

Since they are sovereign you think said terrorist are therefore just in their actions to target them to in turn effect the state

Logically speaking

No because billy bob isn’t telling the government to bomb Muhammad cause he is getting water

Republics claim they vote people in to represent them on matters of state. Leadership in turn acts on their behalf. Which you can argue sure. But overall doesn’t give ya right to terrorism. Since anyone outside a 5 year old knows that’s not cut and dry as the idea of a republic is.

Their sovereign enough to elect people after that point it’s out of their hands.

Sure but again doesn’t give ya the legitimacy to be a terrorist

I don’t think it is a lie. Because republics innately operate as any government would for utility and self preservation on a macro scale. But the constitution protects our rights and aligns us as sovereign.

No there not lol. Because then we can still just keep bombing them if they want to make it a zero sum game.

Retaliate against government forces not the average citizenry.

Not really

Your operating in alignment to a reality you know is not true which makes the terrorists unjust no matter how much they want to pigeon hole their activities are in the right

More like them misinterpreting the thinking and taking it at its zenith conclusion that them blowing themselves up is just

Just like I don’t think 1 to 1 they operate in an olicharchy when they don’t enforce every religious law known to man.

Maybe that’s why there bombing us

They want to join the gay orgies

But there not invited

Ramadan- good

Infidels- bad

Considering they didn’t want to be subject to a new monarch

That is a big question the revolution had. They wanted French support without ending up French subjects.

Well ya but still the newly founded Americans weren’t exactly keen to adopt le baguette if push came to shove

The allies saw Vichy as more legitimate then de Gaulle

Well that and they didn’t like petan much

I’m talking about free French

Ya know the ones run by de Gaulle

Who saw them as traitors

Well collaborators

Which in of itself can be seen negatively and less legitimate

Cause your a government set up by an enemy.

“By the books” ye I’m sure that’s innately how the grumbling French saw it lol with the K98s at the ready.

Ya and petan disbanded it after wards

Making him a de facto dictator

And if your a democratic leaning power you ain’t gonna look at that with legitimacy