offender doesnt speak english very well

give him a break on complex philosophical things and turns of phrase

if anything its more like the tower of babel then platos cave

@Deleted User i wasnt slandering, just explaining cause the other guy didnt seem to see youd missed the point so just assumed you were dumb

im not making a point

im just stating that you dont understand english as well as the guy who made the point much earlier said

which isnt wrong cause you didnt understand the point he made

it was a very long time ago and i cant be bothered going back up

he started going off at you on the point you misunderstood and it all looked very messy

complete breakdown of communication

yeah i mean seperately of you not understanding english you are wrong about most of the things you post on here

slander is different to dissagreement

slander would be me saying that your mother is an african aids whore

and then if she wasnt then it would be slander

me saying that most of the things you post arent backed up by anything other than a group of retarded discredited scientests and other neo nazi/ nazis is just the truth

no it isnt

this is what i mean about english

slander is a very specific word

slander implies falsehood

thats what seperates it

yes

english is my first language and i am a lawyer

what seperates slader from defamation is that slander implies falsehood

no they arent

otherwise there wouldnt be a seperate word

slander IMPLIES falsehood

again

slander implies falsehood

its origins are in the legal system in the common law

and slander is false

implied

even defamatory statements imply falsehood

you are just wrong

english is my first language and i went to law school

i studied this shit

you dont have to be right on this

its an autistic hill to die on anyway

especially when we were talking about your sources being retarded

ARCHAIC

do you know what that means

it means that we dont use it like that anymore

just like the word doth

its ok to be wrong sometimes

its not a personal attack

your wrong about one word

yes

lol

thats why its archaic

i mean i think disagreement is the word for what is occurring

but let me think of one that has the feeling your looking for

no it isnt

look i get what your saying

im trying to find a word that works

no it isnt

also slander comes from the french

esclandre

for scandle

im looking

dishonor is close but doesnt work in the context

mudslinging works in the context

slander is wrong

its implies falsehood

your asking for a word to say when people disagree with you that puts them in the negative

which is pretty sad from the get go

slander again implies falsehood

even far back in the past it implied falsehood

because it came from the normans with old french and was placed into the common law

smear

smear is a good word

thats a different word entirely

they arent exactly the same meaning

otherwise they wouldnt be different words

also try use libel in a sentence

again just because they all are similar doesnt mean they are the same

like the difference between wet and damp

try use libel in a sentence

with regards to someone disagreeing with you

omfg

they arent the same

try use libel in this context

you moron

try use libel

and then you will see its hard to do

libel also can be misconstrued because it is usually used in the legal sense

can you spell cognitive dissonance

yeah i really got btfued

you removed my law degree by finding a word that doesnt make sense in the context you want to use it in

which is to make out that anyone who disagrees with you is misrepresenting you

literal monkeh brain

again

try use it in a sentence

in context

with someone on this server disagreeing with you

semantics doesnt even make sense there

your just showing to a native english speaker that you dont understand the language very well

thats it

you look like a retard

monkeh brain

cherry on top