There are a lot of quantitative evidence that shows abuse isn't a 1-world problem

Too

Define "degeneracy". The Greeks and Romans had morals regarding sexuality, sure, but they still buttfucked little boys ad infinitum

So, if you're concerned with that, just let faggots adopt.

@Gerçek Well that was your concern with when asked to define decay.

Well, the Greek faggots obviously managed since it is viewed as an example of high culture.

We are talking about a culture that 1) Supplied the Christian philosophers/theologians with fundamental concepts. Call it heathen all you want but there is no denying that the Greeks helped form Christianity in its early days. 2) Viewed the love between two males as more pure than between man-woman. I'm just courious abot what is meant as "decay" since it is often used by would-be despots with nothing but pure hatred of man in their hearts

Such a non-response (the first part), I'm not saying that ever Greek man fucked boys but there was a definite cultural tendency towards homophilia in accient Greek. Pointing this out is by no means saying that Greeks all thinked or acted alike and is just a poorly thought out way for you to disregard the facts that what you might call societal decay might not be that.

Ah, so we can only tell if something is part of the societal decay after the fall of our civilization. Useful fucking term you've got there

@Gerçek That is a connection made purely made in your own head and is the product of some kind of wishful thinking. Denonucing an entire culture because they are "heathens" when your whole world-view is based on concepts tought out by individuals in this culture is just plain stupid. All the other shit you say about me claiming the homo side of Greek culture and concepst in Christianity is pure fabrication and a product of your imagination.

Foresight isn't something that is always right, nor does norms, laws and morality needs this. You'll have to produce some sort of proof for this. Also your analogy is so off, you can' compare something as complex as human society with that example (which also can be attributet to induction. A high fall = high movment speed = harder impact)

Norms are not concsiously created for one part, and it does still not prove what you claim, norms are usually the result of necessity in an imediate situtaion and are often nothing more than a result of the material needs in the surrounding enviornment. People speculating about the resulut does not mean that they have any foresight. This is also the case of laws and morality, responses to imediate situations which we then makes a general law out of (the latter only applies to norms and morality as you can understand)

Land of the free https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAj9W0ntUMI

More like expelled

I think Stalins supposed anti-semitism mostly was realpolitik since it only began after the creation of Israel and it having close ties to JewSA

He also critizised the christian faith but later started supporting it realising it was beneficial to his goals. Asigning any ideology to Stalin except that of his own lust for power is just wrong in my onions

Muslims = the jewish golem

It's always the jews with you people, you can't discuss a single topic without them being brought up

That's like saying that when SJWs are calling right-wingers nazis it says more about right-wingers than SJWs. I'm not one for zionism but constantly going "*ooga booga, ITS DA JOOOZ*" is just alienating honest everyday people from the nationalist struggle and is condeming it to prepetual irrelevance and fringe existens

You know what's the most ebin meme is? Anti-jew Trump supporters

^This, it could also be argued that since jews have been living and working in Europe since the age of romans they are a part of the European identity
If you believe that part about Jews being the subject of prognoms are their own fault you should read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis

That part about abrahamites worshipping the same God is straight up false though. That is a theological unverisialist claim not supported by all abrahmites.

No, that statement is so uneducated I want to blow my brains out

The Christian God dying for us is like the key concept of christianity but is lacking in the other faiths for one part

"*that is a quality of the triangle, but that doesn't mean that isn't a square*"

*Ukraine uses all its grain supply to make vodka* "Boohoo, Russia starved us"

lol

Niggas = golem

Middle East is a more immediate target imo

low effort

Being european and using labels as "white" is the ultimate cuckery

Usury isn't work

KC-tier and it was on a discord

You prove your cucked nature again and again

I'd rather have aggressive rectal cancer than be a faggy vegetarian

He liked incest too

Junkie too

Lol

Meth and steroids are now medicine

Not being able to face the consequences of your actions is beta as fuck, man

Fetichizing the man that doomed your politcal views to fringe existens is really iq89

>he visits /pol/
What are you? 15?

Well stop being a fag that can't stand for your views in person

Yeah, that's who I want running my country, a bunch of fags too afraid to express their views unless backed by superior numbers

They are the revolutionary elite and not a bunch of neckbeards with animepillows

I thought Stan was CIA tho

We only deal in cocaine, kid

Are doctors in US in the CIA?

>get history facts from hollywood

You do realise that greeks lacked concepts of linear time and Homer basically was regarded as a historian?

In vic2 it is

Jooz

It is

Ottomans declares war an minutes

No u

Lol, Russia is the most HIV infected country in Eroupe

"*I dress on the basis of whate females like*" GAAAAAY

Takes one to know one

It's not even the second most spoken language in the world

A bachelors isn't even that impressive, any iq89 can get them nowadays and is not by any means a meassure of intelligence

Which field?

Nice, I have been contemplating mechatronics myself. Respectable fields both of them, and considering tha MM probably has one in gender studies all the more impresive

EE is one of the hardest to pass in my country

Then why not chemistry egineering

German idealism was the direct precrusor to marxism, never forget

I do not get the connection between Kant and liberalism though even if I've heard this before. I have also heard people call him an utilitarist which I do not get either

ok

tfw you claim to hate the muslims but your views are the same on woman, jews and that you call decadence How do you solve that cognitive dissonance?

Those things inevitably comes with (high-)technology. Technology (the high-tech atleast) is more than just the collection of concrete pieces of tech and processes. It is a way of thinking and living that alienates humans from nature and in the end even themselves. Social media can be seen as sort of the end result of this process, people are having a harder time distingushing real life from the hyper inflated egos created on SM. Our own bodys and lives are being centered around a version of you that is completely alienated from your actual being and doing. We view our bodies as instruments to maximixe our pleasures, and that is the end result of technology, the instrumenalization of what is most sacred (and no, you do not need to be religious to agree that our bodies/minds are sacred because these are the most important things we have, a human is ultimately not more than what it is doing) and the notion that value is derived from utility. These are not things we can fix and then use technology in a "sensible" or "good" way, this is what (high-) technology is in its essence

According to what metric?

I fail to see how the examples you bring up contradicts anything I said in my post because of these reasons:
1, There is nothing that says that technology as a mindset/world-view is amplifying the worst of the human character. I will elaborate; we do not need to use the form of high technology to exemplify what I'm talking about instead consider mechanized traveling, in this case trains. Before the introduction of these, and similar alternatives, you could only travel by the means of your or an animals labour (this is the best word I can think of, english isn't my first language), this meant that the distance traveled and the effort put into it proportional and the world around you becomes shaped by your actions and *vice versa*. This makes your being-in-the-world and the fact that you are part of something vast and wonderful concrete and tangible, then mechanized traveling came and that started the alienation process (not only that of course). This is the plight of the modern era, the fact that it makes our being-in-the-world something abstract and we lose our connection to both soil, nature and authentic being. This is what is causing hedonism, nihilism and cynism often observed in urbanites (not only).

2, The urban living prevalent today would not be possible, or even something most people would have wanted, without the high-tech that became common around the industrial revolution and forward. without these most people would still be working the fields, blissfully unaware of things like "alienation" and "self-actualization", everything a low-tech farmer does and why he does it is right in front of him. Sure, cities and urban areas have existed in many times, but the Megapolises of the modern era are something the human race never have seen before. Also, this statement makes me wonder if you are urbanites with little experience of rural areas, they are not spared from the plight high-tech brings and this is because (1) is true.

I read about that, I hope child protective services are present when the child is born to take the fuggin baby

Language is hardly an invention since we have proofed that language, and its usage, is something that is something that is coded in our genetics and that we have a predisposition towards it. Your usage of the word "degenerate" is also proof that you do not view this on a objective level, sure, some of these areas contained large numbers of "degenerates" but there are examples of the opposite too. You fail in giving some reason for me to believe that technological as a mindset does not exist and that it is not the main reason for the behavior of the modern world

And we are not talking elites here, we are talking about society as a whole

You are giving me shitty one-liners that are made to support your views and have zero explanatory value

Empirical proofs are not silly. Our genitic predisposition towards language abilities are more than us having vocal chords

It is not my fault that you lack what only can be described as pop-scientific- tier knowledge in the fields of linguistics