@DanielKO I dunno where this comes from, other than a dispute in the fact we disagree on things like programming languages.

2016 was a long time ago but jesus everything turned on it head then

The essence of war is a violent struggle between two hostile,
independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself
on the other. War is fundamentally an interactive social
process. @franti

Politics is inherently masked violence

@Deleted User No it isn't

Top rebuttal

@Deleted User Going full neo-con I see

@Deleted User It is so obviously isn't, that is why military force is part of politics

Pray tell would have MLK be able achive anything If politics is just masked violence

Non-violent action is still action

@Deleted User and?

We have war books that describe Ghandi as a great tactical commander of troops

He just understood how to use masked violence as a method to exhort his will on another

Ghandi molested his nieces

Pure intellectualism

Ghandi didn't manage to unite what is Pakistan and India

He also molested his nieces

Oh wow

He was able to break free from the BRE

but yea

Just because he didnt manage to keep two cultures together as one nation state that takes the place of his accomplishment

didn't manage

I dunno. I just don't like celebrating child molesters as great thinkers

This is not an argument

Fun fact
The first picture when searching french rapist is a picture of JF

@Deleted User Is Jimmy Saville a great host?

@Deleted User was Jim will fix it a great show?

Total war and perfect peace rarely exist in practice. Instead,
they are extremes between which exist the relations among
most political groups. This range includes routine economic
competition, more or less permanent political or ideological
tension, and occasional crises among groups. The decision to
resort to the use of military force of some kind may arise at any
point within these extremes, even during periods of relative
peace. On one end of the spectrum, military force may be used
simply to maintain or restore order in civil disturbances or disaster
relief operations. At the other extreme, force may be used
to completely overturn the existing order within a society or between
two or more societies. Some cultures consider it a moral
imperative to go to war only as a last resort when all peaceful
means to settle disagreements have failed. Others have no such
hesitancy to resort to military force to achieve their aims. @franti

Read Clausewitz and you will understand this better than your ill conceived notions

and I have no clue who Jimmy Saville is

Whenever someone tells me to read something that means they can't answer it themselves and dunno the answer

Jimmy Savile liked Cheese pizza

@Deleted User And I am of the notion of when others have no
hesitancy to resort to military force to achieve their aims.
We as a nation have to responds with force
I am not aguing to apease dictators or be a dormat

That is fair enough

Jimmy savile was a BBC radio and tv host

And he was also a pedo

@SaltySwede and prolific paedo

The line in political violence is one we in the west have the privilege of not experiencing for a long time

And the BBC covered it up

iirc

@Deleted User If you dont respond you get cut down
Peacefull negotiation only works when there is reciprocity

@SaltySwede he was the fucking king of paedos

But

What a title

Political action is the use of the state as your method of violence

Through the force of the state

@SaltySwede I am suprised NABLA hasn't made him like some sort of pilgrimage

@Deleted User Also
Politics is not masked violence. Politics is the civilized alternative to violence. War begins where politics fails. Am I necessarily penning a call to violence with an argumentative political essay? No.

I just answered that above

@Deleted User Nope

The thing that is even more fucked is that he was a kids entertainer

i think

@Deleted User political action can also negate the state entirely

He was the OG Harvey weinstein

that does not change the stated clause

Your exception does not negate the rule

yes it does

Saying exceptions are not important is nonsense

That is not what i said

I said your exception does not negate the rule

When two political powers are struggling for power "peacefully" they will use masked violence to gain power
"Portrayed as a clash between two opposing wills, war appears a simple enterprise."

This is through the action of the state over who they have defeated politically

what is masked violence

that is a bullshit term

I will only respond to you

No u

Until you actually refute a point or bring one up

No, stop using nonsense terms

no u

@Deleted User you are using a nonsense term that you haven't defined

no u

what is masked violence

I've asked you for a definition of a term

When your end goal is to impose your will on someone else. And you accomplish this through means that are not inherently violent.

That isn't violent, so how can it have the term violent attached to it?

It is a masked form of imposed will which is why it is called masked violence

If i get you thrown in jail through peaceful means and i do nothing violent

I have used masked violence

Did I commit a crime?

This is so vague and meaningless

the is irrelevant

And No U

your bullshit terms that don't mean anything are meaningless

No u

No U!

Prager U!

Good at least you are arguing with the rigor you can muster now

There is no proper definition of anything and it is complete bullshit

No U

We reached the hight of intelectual discourse guys

🤣

No Jew!

i don't get it, there is no clear definition of this Masked Violence

Your inability to understand a basic sentence does not constitute "no clear definition"

You inability to explain what you mean tell me that you are talking bullshit

Ghandi did nothing wrong.

^^

And No U

@Deleted User he molested his nieces

I wonder if you have evidence for this claim...