IT IS A LIMITATION

A FORM OF CONTROL

YOU LIKE GLOBALIST CONTROL?

under capitalism a certain debt-to-income ratio is seen as optimal, neither too low nor too high is good

NOT NECESSARILY

if it is nazi, yes

SOME ARGUE FOR ZERO DEBT

NAZISM FAILS BECAUSE IT IS STATE-HEAVY

NATURAL SELECTION WORKS

TRYING TO MAKE MODERNITY WORK IS A FOOL'S ERRAND

actually nazism fails because americans SJW out and bomb the shit out of it

I DISAGREE

prior to that it was working pretty good IMO

IT FAILS INTERNALLY

HITLER DESIGNED IT AS A STOPGAP

well yeah

AND SHOULD HAVE STAYED WITH THAT

HIS POINT

WAS ULTIMATELY TO TRANSITION TO A TRADITIONAL SOCIETY

ultimately Himmler had basically a brahminism plan

I.E. WESTERN CIVILIZATION

YES

EXACTLY

nordic people eating lentils

BIOLOGY > SYSTEMS

that was pretty much his plan

PROBABLY NOT LENTILS

BUT SOMETHING METAPHORICALLY SIMILAR

LENTILS ARE FART FOOD MAN

FWEEEEEEEEEEET

so why does defunding all things that fund POCs and giving it to whites to breed more aryans a bad thing

if biology > systems

NATIONALISM CURES THAT

30% growth rate of nordic people

END THE WELFARE STATE

how does that help

AND LET THE QUALITY CONTROL COMMENCE

are you not a NEET

why does financial survival = quality control

have you never known a smart yet poor person

FINANCIAL SURVIVAL IS PART OF REALISM

well, you are one actually

I HAVE KNOWN MANY SMART POOR PEOPLE

HOWEVER

THEY ARE CONTENT IN THAT ROLE

THE POINT IS: GOOD TO THE GOOD, BAD TO THE BAD

PROMOTE THE EXCELLENT

FINANCE IS ONE WAY, BUT ARISTOCRACY IS BETTER

how is dumping money on geniuses so they have more kids not excellent

THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO HAVE KIDS ANYWAY

"you have 150IQ points, great health and good looks, have kids"

AND

BETTER SYSTEM IS GRANTS FROM ARISTOCRATS

pay them specifically to have kids

GIVE TO THOSE WHO DEMONSTRATE ABILITY

NOT JUST RAW INTELLIGENCE

where will the money for grants come from

ARISTOCRATS OWN LAND AND PROPERTIES

THEY HAVE YEARLY INCOME

AND GIVE SOME OF IT IN GRANTS

MUCH LIKE WAS USED TO FUND CLASSICAL MUSIC

so take what poor people make, redistribute it

AND MUCH OF CLASSICAL LITERATURE

sounds like taxation by another name

POOR PEOPLE MAKE LITTLE

then what is the point of capitalism

THEY CAN BE USED TO MAKE MONEY

BUT BY THEMSELVES, MAKE LITTLE

CAPITALISM = MARKET ECONOMY VS. COMMAND ECONOMY

ALLOW THE BEST TO RISE

okay

THEN ALLOCATE THAT TO ARISTOCRATS

FOR EXAMPLE

GIVE GOOGLE TO THE DUKE OF EDINBOROUGH

let people have a mostly free market, take away a lot of their money and redistribute it based on genes

BETTER THAN LETTING IT STRUGGLE ON ITS OWN

THAT IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BALANCE CAPITALISM WITH ARISTOCRACY, CASTE AND CULTURE

ALSO

NO CONSUMERISM

LET HIGHER CASTES CHOOSE WHAT SUCCEEDS

MUCH OF THE PROBLEM WITH "CAPITALISM" NOW IS THAT DALITS ARE CHOOSING SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTS

so command economy

TWITTER AT $8BN

NO, THE OPPOSITE

SEE WHAT SUCCEEDS, THEN ALLOCATE

INSTEAD OF COMMANDING WHAT "SHOULD" SUCCEED

SOCIALISM SUCKS

IT HAS RUINED EUROPE

or rather, businesses compete and nazi kommandants decide who the winner is

and shut down their competitors

ARISTOCRATS ARE BETTER

THEY CAN GRANT I.P. RIGHTS

THIS MEANS

THAT WEALTH REMAINS IN CONTROL OF THOSE WHO USE IT WELL

INSTEAD OF IDIOTS WHO GOT LUCKY

you need to write this in an article

SEE: GOOGLE, AMAZON, APPLE

I SEE THAT YOU ARE CORRECT

take this log and use it to rewrite a better version of your last article

because this is a lot better than saying "capitalism R gud"