I know but I had a lot of good childhood memories to anti war sentiment and hanging out with punk kids

punk rock didn't come out of the 90s either

who cares? there was a lot more of it then than now

I am just saying, I enjoyed hanging out with anti war vegetarian punk rockers quite a bit, wish that species would return

are you serious

those are the worst ones

but yeah, I don't mean to knock whatever good times you had

NO FUN ALLOWED

that's right

that was where I met the largest percentage of people who absolutely had no regard for society

No mosh, no core, no trends, no fun

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/70/ba/df/70badf247f9fbd2f663928ec2658e4b8.jpg

hey @Deleted User 57835c2c , regardless of whether I think it's retarded

I'm quite pleased you actually read bits of the Manusmriti

it's better than getting it from a gay fox

he knows it backwards and forwards, I am just gradually reading it for myself

everything he says is exactly what he said

it even is more hardcore than some of what he says

it prescribes pennance for jacking off

there are many versions of the Manusmriti

his faggotry is condemned by it

yes of course, a yarfy would be killed in any traditional society

but because he introduced me to brahminism, according to the manusmriti he should be treated as a father and revered even if he has serious flaws

it even says that in the book

so by sticking up for him anyway I am just doing the religion right

wait why should he be treated as a father and revered?

that's what it says, the one who shows you the vedas and indoctrinates you into that life is to be treated like a father

oh, okay, your guru

yes

at the same time, you don't just get this knowledge from simply anyone

it even explicitly says to do that even if they have flaws

there's another side to that though

it prescribes how much to revere teachers under many circumstances, even imperfect teachers, or teachers who do not practice the law correctly

and it still weighs way in favor of me treating yarfy well despite his flaws

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_Smriti#Significance_and_role_in_history

that bit should be read too

like I said, over the next few years I want to know it all for myself

Yarfy has an extreme advantage over me by being a NEET

he has tons of time to study this stuff

where does Mormonism fit into this

i use Yandex as search engine to to much better image search, which is sometims better than Google's

so far IMO there is very little conflict between hardcore mormonism and brahminism

a few doctrinal differences at the core, where I of course favor the mormon

but aesthetically and for a lot of smaller things, I favor brahminism

for example, I do not believe in reincarnation, and I believe in a slightly different creation story

and vastly different afterlife

I basically do not even do anything on the internet anymore at all

just a few chat rooms and reading reddit, almost never posting anywhere, no blog, no social media

I need to fill my hard drive to the brim with MLP diaper porn

so if anyone ever compromises this computer, they get their souls compromised in return

...

So I heard, the eye is a gateway to the soul

I reach for the opposite. I want my computer to be squeaky clean to reflect my soul.

Chats like this are sort of in between

Between earth and hell, but ultimately slightly closer to earth

my life is clean to reflect my soul

So I heard, cleanliness is next to godliness

But the way I see it

It's never enough

I could see a few ways my life could be cleaner

Brahmanic body of scriptures is gargantuan

And so is Buddhist

But to understand the core of Buddhist doctrine, one should drift from Pali Canon, which is itself also gargantuan, only for the sake of interest in folklore things

buddhist is a derivative of brahmanic

so you can't really understand it unless you understand brahmanic first

In a way, because of certain philosophical concepts

buddhism is to brahminism like protestantism is to catholicism

But they can also be understood from Hermetic and Greek works

I can't exactly agree

Protestantism was involution from Catholicism

It represented involution towards what's the most base and primitive in Christianty

Whereas Buddhism focused on what is the most ascetic, that is, which belongs to domain of personal undertaking, rather than domain of culture

having a lot of experience with buddhism I think the same really

buddhism is brahminism for retards

that's why guatama lost his varna and became a sudra

Not really

we R all ekwul 😃

Buddhism, once properly understood, and is very close to Greek philosophy and especially Hermeticism

Buddhism does not propagate equality

The opposite, it holds contempt for the fool, the base, the primiive, that which refuses to take action

the only buddhists I like are the shaolin

everyone else are total faggots

Buddism is by definition fool-proof since it gives the lay man almost no platform

in fact brahmin shaolin is my ideal society

That's why all those liberals whi chant about Buddha's "peacefulness" are given absolutely no platform, since by Buddhist doctrine itself, they are par exellence fools

Buddhism cannot enable no retard, unlike some other doctrines

take a retard, give him a bath, he is now one of us

while brahminism says to bathe daily minimum

Exactly, no unfit person will ever receive training in Buddhist ascesis, and isn't capable to understand it

Which is why doctrine, even though openly presented, is completely incomprehensible to average man

The same is with Brahmanic doctrine too

Whose concepts, which are borrowed by Buddhism, Shaktism etc.

Are completely incomprehensible in their secret, obscured meaning, to an average man

why not go to the source directly

brahminism openly says "aryan only" in the early texts

it's simply the point of historical perspective

In Buddhas time already, he accepted that Brahmanism has morphed into vanity

I mean most buddhism really is not so bad

I support it over most other religions

And so he looked to develop doctrine which will allow person opportunity ro realize himself without being misled by priestly decay