which would mean Israel and Saudis/UAE as well

"interplexing"

its a nice word

my brain stopped working

the meaning is clear

congrats, you just invented a word

come on man, such little faith in your own abilities

I'm going to use interplexing from now on

@The Enlightened Shepherd NO DOUBT SADDAM WAS A BAD GUY

HOWEVER

THERE IS A WRINKLE

IN COUNTRIES FULL OF BAD GUYS

Oppressive order is usually preferable to total chaos

YOU NEED BAD GUYS TO RULE

i meant sth esle but by god i cant remember the word

nah, that's bullshit

SADDAM'S PROBLEM WAS DIVERSITY

INTERWEAVING

VERSUS

MULTIPLEXING

it's a comfortable excuse for westerners

"these people deserve this ruler"

OVERLAPING

yes

@fallot IN FACT, OPPRESSIVE ORDER IS ALWAYS NECESSARY

Saddam was a Despot

ESPECIALLY WITH MORE CHAOTIC GROUPS

LIKE HIGH IQ EUROPEANS

Which made him a better thing than Bush or Blair

well, sometimes the oppression can be of such a nature that chaos is preferable, e,g, Pol Pot rule

For his own people

TRUE. BUT POL POT WAS A RED

REDS ARE JUST BAD PERIOD

INEPT KLEPTOCRATS

no argument here

I think they are supernaturally evil

EVERY TIME YOU KILL A COMMUNIST, AN ANGEL GETS ITS WINGS.

I AM OF THAT OPINION AS WELL

THEIR SOULS HAVE COLLAPSED

DWARF STARS

GOING TO BLACK HOLE STATUS

(AND NOT THE KIND OF "BLACK HOLE" YOU GUYS *USUALLY* TALK ABOUT AROUND HERE...)

Saddam was a typical type of Anatolian despot

The lion type of ruler

it's kind of sad that the "cultural red-ism" will succeed

where the explicit one would fail

for just being too effective too fast

He ruled as a family-based strong man

http://www.deathmetal.org/news/google-endorses-diversity-multiculturalism-and-antisemitism/

By right of Arab tradition

CULTURAL LEFTISM WILL JUST TAKE LONGER TO FAIL

maybe over time he would have turned into that @The Enlightened Shepherd , his sons etc.

He decorated himself entirely with Arab lore and culture

but Saddam was more of an upstart

SADDAM WAS BRUTAL BUT WITHOUT PURPOSE BEYOND HIMSELF

THAT WAS HIS FAILING

THIS MAKES HIM A TYRANT

YES, HE KEPT ORDER... BUT SO DID STALIN

the history of the Baath movement is key to both Syria and Iraq

IF HE HAD ENACTED GENERAL EUGENICS, I WOULD HAVE LIKED HIM

Even his attack on Iran, foolish as it was

OF COURSE, I WOULD NOT HAVE REMOVED HIM

Displayed his rather old-fashioned sense of power play

THE PROBLEM IS THAT ISRAEL IS ESSENTIALLY DOOMED IF THE ARABS GET MISSILES/NUKES/GAS

That war was such an important event yet so obscure today

USA IS COMMITTED TO AVOIDING THAT BECAUSE OF HIGH INTELLIGENCE BENEFIT OF ISRAEL

I never understood that

Iran-Iraq war was massive and epic

WHO ARE ESSENTIALLY OUR PENETRATION INTO THE EURASIAN AREA

Why would Israel be threatened by those countries

WHICH IS STILL RIDDLED WITH JEWISH PEOPLE WHO REPORT BACK TO MOSSAD

except by say demographics

ARAB COUNTRIES GENERALLY WANT TO OBLITERATE ISRAEL

ANCIENT ETHNIC WARFARE

AND PROTOCOLS OF ZION TYPE STUFF

seems more like the other way round to me

Israel wants to stir shit up in its neighbourhood

Arabs dont like Palestinians generally

They don't like them as refugees

they couldn't care less if some Jews live in a tiny corner of the Levant

especially if some dude with a gun tells them

Since that's what theyare in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan

to do it

maybe some decades ago, when the wound was still fresh

Shia and secular Sunni Arabs

there would be more ire against Israel

are fiercely hostile to Jews and Israel

Esspecially Lebanese

Syrian and Iranian Baathists and Shias

Lebanese have very good reason

@diversity_is_racism pretty much

Iran is hostile to Israel beyond Islam

They have thousands of years of such hostility

all of this is beyond Islam, it's simply framed in islamic terms because the parties are Muslims

every war becomes a holy war

like Kosovo

Iran is correctly perceived by Israel as in civilizational terms, much more formidable foe than all Arabs combined

Chechnya

Kashmir