general

Discord ID: 267086373285134338


257,056 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 53/2571 | Next

2017-02-04 01:42:51 UTC

Men who does not believe that he fundamentally matters and that his life has a purpose

2017-02-04 01:43:02 UTC

Will not act heroically

2017-02-04 01:43:43 UTC

If everything is pre-ordained in a Abrahamic sense, than only proper course of actions is sitting and waiting because everything will happen without your intervention anyway

2017-02-04 01:44:02 UTC

The opposite of that is pondering your destiny and ultimately making a sacriice

2017-02-04 01:55:19 UTC

ID EST

2017-02-04 01:55:21 UTC

SODOMIZE

2017-02-04 01:55:23 UTC

THE

2017-02-04 01:55:24 UTC

WEAK

2017-02-04 01:55:30 UTC

66614886969

2017-02-04 02:20:02 UTC

@Maarat The Catholic God is known simply, in Mass, as "The God of Fire and Light."
@The Enlightened Shepherd I still do not believe that Christianity is by necessity this deterministic. But I do see it a lot on all Abrahamic religions and dislike it.
@diversity_is_racism I wonder if we could spread messages in numeric code as graffiti and such? What kind of ARG would it be if a whole bunch of YouTubers scanned your messages and they read "sodomize the weak!"?

2017-02-04 02:20:32 UTC

@-A catholicism is false

2017-02-04 02:20:34 UTC

PAPISTS

2017-02-04 02:20:43 UTC

restricitng the traditional european role of the all-father

2017-02-04 02:20:48 UTC

all great kings told the pope to shove it

2017-02-04 02:21:02 UTC

look at charlemagne when told about monogamy

2017-02-04 02:21:06 UTC

one wife?

2017-02-04 02:21:07 UTC

what?

2017-02-04 02:21:15 UTC

fine I will have a dozen concubines

2017-02-04 02:21:43 UTC

Henry II? You mean I can't divorce my wife? Fine I'll throw her in a dungeon and fuck my gay sons's teenage fiance

2017-02-04 02:21:52 UTC

who he isn't going to bother knocking up

2017-02-04 02:26:43 UTC

Catholicism is a simplification of European Paganism. It is meant to make it more available to the public. As for Charlemagne, he built what we know of as the foundation of the Papacy today. One wife? It depends. In the olden days, the role of the mistress and the courtesan were quite vague. But, do we need numbers? Should we try to create conditions that suit a fair mating market? When one is secure in the morality of the caste system and the cohesion of the people, a few more peasants won't hurt, with an underground in the sky behind the closed doors of the pagoda. Divorce? Nope. That shit is final. Daddy stiffed you? The Pope should grant his blessing. That is war worthy. However, not being able to make a male heir? You know what? Knock up a courtesan fit for the King's court and say it was your wife's. It doesn't HAVE to be this way but, what did they have to gain by trying to make it work?

2017-02-04 02:43:11 UTC

PAGANISM IS A CONCEPT

2017-02-04 02:43:18 UTC

THAT CAN APPEAR IN MANY RELIGIONS

2017-02-04 02:43:22 UTC

POINT IS

2017-02-04 02:43:27 UTC

WE NEED TO FIX ALL RELIGIONS

2017-02-04 02:43:29 UTC

FOR EUROPE

2017-02-04 02:43:33 UTC

BY MAKING THEM CONTOUR

2017-02-04 02:43:36 UTC

TO PAGANISM

2017-02-04 02:44:14 UTC

To make them perpetuate the Pagan principles, concepts and messages again. No more dualist nonsense.

2017-02-04 02:44:23 UTC

Or one and done salvations.

2017-02-04 02:51:44 UTC

DUALISM = FECALITY

2017-02-04 02:51:54 UTC

MONISM = SANITY (AND THEREFORE, MARGINALIZED!)

2017-02-04 02:51:56 UTC

BUT REALLY

2017-02-04 02:51:59 UTC

WHAT IS LOGICAL?

2017-02-04 02:52:03 UTC

APPLIES TO BOTH WORLDS

2017-02-04 02:52:07 UTC

BUT PEOPLE FEAR THIS.

2017-02-04 02:55:14 UTC

I suppose it depends on what you think logic is. Is logic that you understand the chain of events and try to understand their underlying principles (and that you might not be able to) or is logic anthropomorphism or how something is or is not convenient for humans?

2017-02-04 02:55:19 UTC

I would say the former.

2017-02-04 02:55:29 UTC

A thing is what it is. A thing in itself.

2017-02-04 02:56:22 UTC

BLACK POWER 1488!

2017-02-04 02:56:32 UTC

LOGIC IS EXTERNAL TO HUMANS

2017-02-04 02:56:45 UTC

WE CAN TUNE INTO IT, LIKE A RADIO PROGRAM, SOMETIMES...AND OFTEN IT IS DISTORTED

2017-02-04 02:56:50 UTC

OUR MONKEY SELVES DRIVE IT OUT

2017-02-04 02:56:53 UTC

WE ARE INFERIOR

2017-02-04 02:56:56 UTC

HUMANS

2017-02-04 02:56:58 UTC

TO THE GODS

2017-02-04 03:00:49 UTC

I can get behind that. I tend to believe in the Higher Power concept. It is instinctual though some might call that superstitious. But, I get what you mean without the spiritual element. It is what it is. We are a part of it and if we decide we are bigger than it, it sweeps us away.

2017-02-04 03:02:01 UTC

@diversity_is_racism who said that sometimes they are inferior to themselves on the podcast? That was an astute obvs. Loved it.

2017-02-04 03:03:10 UTC

@MRB I HAVE TALENTED COHOSTS

2017-02-04 03:03:14 UTC

THEY DO THE HARD WORK

2017-02-04 03:03:28 UTC

@-A GOD IS EVIDENT ONCE ONE HAS TIME/PEACE OF MIND TO ANALYZE

2017-02-04 03:03:34 UTC

THE QUESTION OF REALITY

2017-02-04 03:03:38 UTC

IT IS ULTIMATELY

2017-02-04 03:03:43 UTC

A CAUSE/EFFECT CALCULATION

2017-02-04 03:25:42 UTC

Podcast? I need to know where to find that.

2017-02-04 03:30:16 UTC

WE FAILED TO "NAME THE JEW"

2017-02-04 03:30:21 UTC

THEREFORE

2017-02-04 03:30:24 UTC

WE ARE REPUBLICANS

2017-02-04 03:30:25 UTC

I THINK

2017-02-04 03:31:27 UTC

@diversity_is_racism You know, it's funny. When one starts talking about the notion of a God itself, never mind how it can be considered as the Balancing Factor, talking about it either in text or outloud with someone else, one is forced to really think about it and deal with the notion is a more direct way. It isn't just in your own head. This makes for a great opportunity to see it from a new angle but, it can also be that self-doubt thing that people who at least want to think tend to face with.

Was there a Jew to name. Wait, does that one guy who was part Jewish count as the named Jew?

2017-02-04 03:32:01 UTC

WHEN ONE CONFRONTS THE CONCEPT OF GOD

2017-02-04 03:32:05 UTC

THE DECISION IS BINARY

2017-02-04 03:32:07 UTC

TERRIFYING

2017-02-04 03:32:11 UTC

WE NAMED THE JEW

2017-02-04 03:32:14 UTC

HIS NAME IS AARON

2017-02-04 03:33:17 UTC

haha who is aaron?!

2017-02-04 03:33:31 UTC

SOME JEWISH GUY

2017-02-04 03:33:33 UTC

WE NAMED HIM

2017-02-04 03:33:37 UTC

WE CALLED HIM "BILL"

2017-02-04 03:33:40 UTC

NOW THE JEW IS NAMED

2017-02-04 03:33:51 UTC

my name IRL is BIll ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

2017-02-04 03:34:00 UTC

Ruh-Roh

2017-02-04 03:34:02 UTC

IT'S A GOOD NAME

2017-02-04 03:34:04 UTC

YOU KNOW

2017-02-04 03:34:11 UTC

I KIND OF WISH I HAD BEEN NAMED WILLIAM

2017-02-04 03:34:15 UTC

SO MANY OPTIONS

2017-02-04 03:34:17 UTC

ALSO

2017-02-04 03:34:19 UTC

oh yeah lots

2017-02-04 03:34:20 UTC

SUCH A STORIED NAME

2017-02-04 03:34:34 UTC

I was the 3rd Bill

2017-02-04 03:34:37 UTC

BILL, WILL, MOHAMMED

2017-02-04 03:34:38 UTC

I had no choice

2017-02-04 03:34:40 UTC

THE UNPAID BILL?

2017-02-04 03:34:49 UTC

DID YOU SEE "TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY"?

2017-02-04 03:34:53 UTC

Yes

2017-02-04 03:34:54 UTC

LOTS OF WILLIAM JOKES

2017-02-04 03:34:57 UTC

GREAT FILM

2017-02-04 03:35:01 UTC

ya

2017-02-04 03:35:03 UTC

BILL ROACH, BEST WATCHER IN THE UNIT

2017-02-04 03:35:15 UTC

maybe I should switch to "Liam"

2017-02-04 03:35:24 UTC

Way more explictly white

2017-02-04 03:35:32 UTC

Willie the unpaid, Mohommedan Jew?

2017-02-04 03:35:53 UTC

AL-WILLIAM

2017-02-04 03:35:55 UTC

JIHADIST

2017-02-04 03:36:22 UTC

There were also many fine Monarchs named William.

2017-02-04 03:36:35 UTC

I hear one was a real bastard.

2017-02-04 03:36:52 UTC

Genghis Kahned this whole part of England and everything

2017-02-04 03:36:54 UTC

OCCASIONAL BASTARDS

2017-02-04 03:37:01 UTC

SOUNDS LIKE A SUMMARY OF MODERNITY

257,056 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 53/2571 | Next